1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,000 cc 2 00:00:01,000 --> 00:00:02,633 >> It's my great pleasure to 3 00:00:02,633 --> 00:00:04,466 introduce my colleague, Claudia 4 00:00:04,466 --> 00:00:07,800 Card, who is a UW Alum. 5 00:00:07,800 --> 00:00:09,000 I'm not going to tell you 6 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:11,366 exactly when she graduated, but 7 00:00:11,366 --> 00:00:14,200 she's one of ours. 8 00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:15,533 After having taken her 9 00:00:15,533 --> 00:00:17,300 undergraduate degree here, she 10 00:00:17,300 --> 00:00:18,566 went off to Harvard to earn her 11 00:00:18,566 --> 00:00:20,133 PhD. 12 00:00:20,133 --> 00:00:21,600 During the point at which she 13 00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:22,900 was completing her PhD she came 14 00:00:22,900 --> 00:00:26,000 back to her Alma Mater and began 15 00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,000 teaching for us, and has been 16 00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:34,833 doing for about 47 years. 17 00:00:34,833 --> 00:00:37,800 Not only is Professor Card a 18 00:00:37,800 --> 00:00:39,033 member of our department, she's 19 00:00:39,033 --> 00:00:40,766 also affiliated with the Jewish 20 00:00:40,766 --> 00:00:42,033 Studies program, the Women's 21 00:00:42,033 --> 00:00:43,800 Studies program, the Institute 22 00:00:43,800 --> 00:00:45,700 for Environmental Studies and 23 00:00:45,700 --> 00:00:47,700 the LGBTQ Studies program as 24 00:00:47,700 --> 00:00:48,866 well. 25 00:00:48,866 --> 00:00:50,666 She's the author of four books. 26 00:00:50,666 --> 00:00:52,866 She's edited six more. 27 00:00:52,866 --> 00:00:54,566 She's the author of over 90 28 00:00:54,566 --> 00:00:55,933 articles, many of which are 29 00:00:55,933 --> 00:00:57,166 reprinted in anthologies and 30 00:00:57,166 --> 00:00:58,500 translated into a variety of 31 00:00:58,500 --> 00:00:59,800 languages. 32 00:00:59,800 --> 00:01:01,400 Professor Card has delivered 33 00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:04,300 over 300 talks in her career. 34 00:01:04,300 --> 00:01:05,666 She's currently working on two 35 00:01:05,666 --> 00:01:06,933 books, an introduction to 36 00:01:06,933 --> 00:01:09,466 feminist philosophy, and a third 37 00:01:09,466 --> 00:01:11,900 in a trilogy on evil. 38 00:01:11,900 --> 00:01:14,433 This first two installments of 39 00:01:14,433 --> 00:01:16,400 which were published to great 40 00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:18,333 acclaim, The Atrocity Paradigm, 41 00:01:18,333 --> 00:01:19,566 that was published by Oxford 42 00:01:19,566 --> 00:01:22,233 University Press in 2006 and 43 00:01:22,233 --> 00:01:24,133 Confronting Evils published by 44 00:01:24,133 --> 00:01:27,300 Cambridge in 2010. 45 00:01:27,300 --> 00:01:28,733 Professor Card has earned a 46 00:01:28,733 --> 00:01:30,166 number of awards including the 47 00:01:30,166 --> 00:01:31,266 Distinguished Woman Philosopher 48 00:01:31,266 --> 00:01:33,000 of the Year in 1996, and the 49 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:35,933 NEH, an ACLS award. 50 00:01:35,933 --> 00:01:37,433 She's been a resident fellow 51 00:01:37,433 --> 00:01:38,700 with the Institute for Research 52 00:01:38,700 --> 00:01:39,933 and Humanities here, as well as 53 00:01:39,933 --> 00:01:41,300 a senior fellow. 54 00:01:41,300 --> 00:01:42,833 And she's won the university's 55 00:01:42,833 --> 00:01:44,366 Hilldale Award, a kind of 56 00:01:44,366 --> 00:01:45,600 capstone career award for 57 00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:48,333 excellence in teaching service 58 00:01:48,333 --> 00:01:49,800 and research. 59 00:01:49,800 --> 00:01:51,166 She's been a past-president of 60 00:01:51,166 --> 00:01:52,200 the Central Division of the 61 00:01:52,200 --> 00:01:53,300 American Philosophical 62 00:01:53,300 --> 00:01:54,633 Association. 63 00:01:54,633 --> 00:01:55,666 And her work has been the 64 00:01:55,666 --> 00:01:57,000 subject of three volumes of 65 00:01:57,000 --> 00:01:58,633 collected essays by those who've 66 00:01:58,633 --> 00:02:00,200 been impressed by her impact 67 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:01,566 within the field. 68 00:02:01,566 --> 00:02:02,933 Professor Card has been an 69 00:02:02,933 --> 00:02:04,333 influential mentor to 70 00:02:04,333 --> 00:02:05,666 generations of graduate students 71 00:02:05,666 --> 00:02:07,600 here at UW. 72 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:08,833 She is renowned for her 73 00:02:08,833 --> 00:02:10,000 groundbreaking work in feminist 74 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:11,233 philosophy, and in moral 75 00:02:11,233 --> 00:02:12,600 philosophy more generally. 76 00:02:12,600 --> 00:02:14,466 She's been quite generous with 77 00:02:14,466 --> 00:02:15,600 her time, giving dozens of 78 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:17,166 public lectures. 79 00:02:17,166 --> 00:02:18,533 This is only the latest of 80 00:02:18,533 --> 00:02:22,200 which, and over 20 times she's 81 00:02:22,200 --> 00:02:23,900 been invited to talk on the 82 00:02:23,900 --> 00:02:26,166 radio and on television. 83 00:02:26,166 --> 00:02:27,700 I hope you'll join me 84 00:02:27,700 --> 00:02:29,033 enthusiastically in welcoming my 85 00:02:29,033 --> 00:02:30,500 colleague, Claudia Card, who 86 00:02:30,500 --> 00:02:31,833 will be talking this night about 87 00:02:31,833 --> 00:02:33,700 genocide and social death. 88 00:02:33,700 --> 00:02:35,966 [applause] 89 00:02:45,900 --> 00:02:47,966 >> Thank you, Russ, for that 90 00:02:47,966 --> 00:02:50,766 generous introduction. 91 00:02:50,766 --> 00:02:52,366 Genocide has become the 92 00:02:52,366 --> 00:02:55,366 paradigm atrocity of our time. 93 00:02:55,366 --> 00:02:56,566 Etymologically, the word 94 00:02:56,566 --> 00:02:58,333 "genocide" which was coined less 95 00:02:58,333 --> 00:03:00,500 than a century ago, should mean 96 00:03:00,500 --> 00:03:02,900 the killing of a tribe. 97 00:03:02,900 --> 00:03:04,500 But most victims of genocide 98 00:03:04,500 --> 00:03:06,266 today are not what we would 99 00:03:06,266 --> 00:03:07,900 naturally call tribes. 100 00:03:07,900 --> 00:03:09,633 For this reason, among others, 101 00:03:09,633 --> 00:03:10,966 not everyone understands 102 00:03:10,966 --> 00:03:13,200 genocide in the same way. 103 00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:14,733 The International Association of 104 00:03:14,733 --> 00:03:17,500 Genocide Scholars asks on its 105 00:03:17,500 --> 00:03:19,600 membership application form, 106 00:03:19,600 --> 00:03:21,633 what definition of genocide do 107 00:03:21,633 --> 00:03:24,000 you use in your work? 108 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:25,900 Here are some questions commonly 109 00:03:25,900 --> 00:03:30,600 asked by those who think about 110 00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:32,266 genocide and those who may have 111 00:03:32,266 --> 00:03:34,366 obligations to respond to 112 00:03:34,366 --> 00:03:36,900 genocides. 113 00:03:36,900 --> 00:03:38,333 The basic philosophical question 114 00:03:38,333 --> 00:03:40,066 would naturally be, what is a 115 00:03:40,066 --> 00:03:41,300 genocide? 116 00:03:41,300 --> 00:03:43,866 Under that, widely discussed 117 00:03:43,866 --> 00:03:45,800 questions are, how does it 118 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:47,400 differ from non-genocidal 119 00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:49,133 mass-murder, such as the 120 00:03:49,133 --> 00:03:51,000 Oklahoma City bombing or the 121 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:53,033 Tokyo subway gassing, the 122 00:03:53,033 --> 00:03:55,600 bombings of 9/11, or even the 123 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:59,100 Columbine High School massacre? 124 00:03:59,100 --> 00:04:01,166 Is mass murder even necessary 125 00:04:01,166 --> 00:04:04,066 for genocide? 126 00:04:04,066 --> 00:04:05,833 As a crime, is genocide 127 00:04:05,833 --> 00:04:07,733 redundant, given the already 128 00:04:07,733 --> 00:04:09,766 existing war crimes and crimes 129 00:04:09,766 --> 00:04:11,233 against humanity? 130 00:04:11,233 --> 00:04:12,566 That is, does it identify 131 00:04:12,566 --> 00:04:15,100 something new? 132 00:04:15,100 --> 00:04:17,766 Is genocide the worst crime, or 133 00:04:17,766 --> 00:04:23,033 the most evil, that you can 134 00:04:23,033 --> 00:04:25,700 imagine? 135 00:04:25,700 --> 00:04:27,266 Against what kinds of groups can 136 00:04:27,266 --> 00:04:29,100 genocide be committed? 137 00:04:29,100 --> 00:04:30,400 Could there, for example, be a 138 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:31,666 gay genocide? 139 00:04:31,666 --> 00:04:33,633 Would femicide be a kind of 140 00:04:33,633 --> 00:04:35,300 genocide? 141 00:04:35,300 --> 00:04:36,700 What about people with 142 00:04:36,700 --> 00:04:38,033 disabilities? 143 00:04:38,033 --> 00:04:40,133 What about evil groups? 144 00:04:40,133 --> 00:04:41,700 What kinds of acts can be 145 00:04:41,700 --> 00:04:43,333 genocidal? 146 00:04:43,333 --> 00:04:45,333 What underlies the judgment that 147 00:04:45,333 --> 00:04:47,233 genocide is never justifiable or 148 00:04:47,233 --> 00:04:51,300 even excusable? 149 00:04:51,300 --> 00:04:52,700 I begin with the idea that 150 00:04:52,700 --> 00:04:54,100 genocide is the murder of a 151 00:04:54,100 --> 00:04:56,066 people or other significant 152 00:04:56,066 --> 00:04:58,000 community. 153 00:04:58,000 --> 00:04:59,733 My hypothesis is that social 154 00:04:59,733 --> 00:05:01,500 death is utterly central to the 155 00:05:01,500 --> 00:05:04,166 idea of murdering a people. 156 00:05:04,166 --> 00:05:05,866 Social death is a concept I 157 00:05:05,866 --> 00:05:08,433 borrow from historian Orlando 158 00:05:08,433 --> 00:05:10,066 Patterson's book, Slavery and 159 00:05:10,066 --> 00:05:11,966 Social Death, which was 160 00:05:11,966 --> 00:05:14,600 published in 1982. 161 00:05:14,600 --> 00:05:15,800 You'll see on your handout, on 162 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:18,200 the back, there's a bibliography 163 00:05:18,200 --> 00:05:21,133 of works, some of which I will 164 00:05:21,133 --> 00:05:23,300 refer to, and others of which I 165 00:05:23,300 --> 00:05:26,466 have found helpful. 166 00:05:26,466 --> 00:05:27,800 Patterson used the concept of 167 00:05:27,800 --> 00:05:29,266 social death to describe the 168 00:05:29,266 --> 00:05:30,933 plight of slaves who were 169 00:05:30,933 --> 00:05:33,300 captured in Africa and survived 170 00:05:33,300 --> 00:05:34,533 the middle passage to the 171 00:05:34,533 --> 00:05:36,000 Americas. 172 00:05:36,000 --> 00:05:37,866 They were torn from their roots, 173 00:05:37,866 --> 00:05:39,400 chained together with others who 174 00:05:39,400 --> 00:05:41,433 spoke different languages. 175 00:05:41,433 --> 00:05:43,000 And in the New World they were 176 00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:44,600 robbed of the security of even 177 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:46,533 their own family connections by 178 00:05:46,533 --> 00:05:48,033 the practice of selling off 179 00:05:48,033 --> 00:05:49,433 children, spouses, and other 180 00:05:49,433 --> 00:05:50,966 kin. 181 00:05:50,966 --> 00:05:52,433 In the Americas, Patterson 182 00:05:52,433 --> 00:05:54,266 argued, relationships among 183 00:05:54,266 --> 00:05:57,900 slaves had no social security, 184 00:05:57,900 --> 00:06:00,066 and so slaves, he 185 00:06:00,066 --> 00:06:02,000 concluded, were socially dead. 186 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:03,633 Later generations of slaves who 187 00:06:03,633 --> 00:06:04,966 were born to a condition of 188 00:06:04,966 --> 00:06:06,333 social death were said by 189 00:06:06,333 --> 00:06:08,366 Patterson to be natally 190 00:06:08,366 --> 00:06:10,366 alienated, cut off from social 191 00:06:10,366 --> 00:06:12,766 ties in both directions, both to 192 00:06:12,766 --> 00:06:13,933 their ancestors and to their 193 00:06:13,933 --> 00:06:16,266 progeny. 194 00:06:16,266 --> 00:06:17,500 These are controversial 195 00:06:17,500 --> 00:06:18,966 hypotheses among historians of 196 00:06:18,966 --> 00:06:20,833 slavery in the Americas who take 197 00:06:20,833 --> 00:06:22,833 seriously the idea of a slave 198 00:06:22,833 --> 00:06:24,666 culture. 199 00:06:24,666 --> 00:06:26,566 To the extent that those critics 200 00:06:26,566 --> 00:06:28,866 are right about slave culture, 201 00:06:28,866 --> 00:06:30,566 genocides may offer clearer 202 00:06:30,566 --> 00:06:32,266 instances of social death than 203 00:06:32,266 --> 00:06:34,300 slavery offered, at least, 204 00:06:34,300 --> 00:06:37,866 slavery in the Americas. 205 00:06:37,866 --> 00:06:39,466 To understand social death, 206 00:06:39,466 --> 00:06:41,033 I start with the idea of social 207 00:06:41,033 --> 00:06:42,933 vitality, and then understand 208 00:06:42,933 --> 00:06:45,400 social death as a deprivation or 209 00:06:45,400 --> 00:06:47,900 loss of social vitality. 210 00:06:47,900 --> 00:06:50,133 By social vitality I understand 211 00:06:50,133 --> 00:06:51,866 the meanings, shapes, and 212 00:06:51,866 --> 00:06:53,600 contents given to the lives of 213 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:55,433 individuals by social 214 00:06:55,433 --> 00:06:58,000 relationships, both personal and 215 00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:00,300 institutional, contemporary and 216 00:07:00,300 --> 00:07:02,766 intergenerational, that unite 217 00:07:02,766 --> 00:07:04,766 them into a people or other 218 00:07:04,766 --> 00:07:06,966 significant community. 219 00:07:06,966 --> 00:07:08,366 Social vitality takes many 220 00:07:08,366 --> 00:07:09,833 forms. 221 00:07:09,833 --> 00:07:11,700 Linguistic, educational, 222 00:07:11,700 --> 00:07:13,766 political, economic, artistic, 223 00:07:13,766 --> 00:07:15,666 and religious institutions all 224 00:07:15,666 --> 00:07:17,733 contribute, as do friendship and 225 00:07:17,733 --> 00:07:19,866 kinship networks. 226 00:07:19,866 --> 00:07:21,866 Major loss of social vitality is 227 00:07:21,866 --> 00:07:23,766 a loss of social identity, and 228 00:07:23,766 --> 00:07:25,633 consequently, a serious loss of 229 00:07:25,633 --> 00:07:28,200 meaning for your existence. 230 00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:29,600 Putting social death at the 231 00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:32,133 center takes the focus off body 232 00:07:32,133 --> 00:07:34,566 counts, and puts it instead on 233 00:07:34,566 --> 00:07:36,200 the kinds of relationships that 234 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:37,966 give meaning to the lives of 235 00:07:37,966 --> 00:07:39,866 individuals. 236 00:07:39,866 --> 00:07:41,366 Social death, so understood, has 237 00:07:41,366 --> 00:07:43,500 degrees, and as we will see, it 238 00:07:43,500 --> 00:07:47,300 typically has stages. 239 00:07:47,300 --> 00:07:48,766 Sometimes, social vitality is 240 00:07:48,766 --> 00:07:50,400 recoverable or re-creatable in 241 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:51,800 new forms. 242 00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:54,166 Often it is not. 243 00:07:54,166 --> 00:07:55,566 Social death sounds like 244 00:07:55,566 --> 00:07:57,300 something suffered by a group. 245 00:07:57,300 --> 00:07:58,900 It is. 246 00:07:58,900 --> 00:08:00,333 But what makes social death 247 00:08:00,333 --> 00:08:01,800 morally significant is that it 248 00:08:01,800 --> 00:08:03,733 is suffered by individuals, 249 00:08:03,733 --> 00:08:05,733 members of the group, in virtue 250 00:08:05,733 --> 00:08:07,800 of their group membership. 251 00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:10,033 It robs their lives of meaning, 252 00:08:10,033 --> 00:08:12,133 or robs them of the ability to 253 00:08:12,133 --> 00:08:14,033 give meaning to their lives, and 254 00:08:14,033 --> 00:08:15,666 in so doing, robs them of 255 00:08:15,666 --> 00:08:17,166 fundamental aspects of their 256 00:08:17,166 --> 00:08:19,000 humanity. 257 00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:20,533 The social death of individuals 258 00:08:20,533 --> 00:08:22,433 can have other sources than 259 00:08:22,433 --> 00:08:24,333 genocide; slavery, banishment, 260 00:08:24,333 --> 00:08:27,333 disfigurement, illness, even 261 00:08:27,333 --> 00:08:29,666 self-chosen isolation, becoming 262 00:08:29,666 --> 00:08:31,100 a hermit. 263 00:08:31,100 --> 00:08:33,000 But in most of these cases, one 264 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:34,966 is not ordinarily cut off from a 265 00:08:34,966 --> 00:08:36,733 shared language, history, 266 00:08:36,733 --> 00:08:39,033 traditions, and so on. 267 00:08:39,033 --> 00:08:40,833 In genocide, social death is 268 00:08:40,833 --> 00:08:42,900 extreme. 269 00:08:42,900 --> 00:08:44,400 I take seriously Nietzsche's 270 00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:46,133 observation that only what has 271 00:08:46,133 --> 00:08:48,733 no history is definable, that 272 00:08:48,733 --> 00:08:50,400 is, in terms of necessary and 273 00:08:50,400 --> 00:08:52,233 sufficient conditions. 274 00:08:52,233 --> 00:08:53,666 And so, I want to leave the 275 00:08:53,666 --> 00:08:55,066 notion of being "utterly 276 00:08:55,066 --> 00:08:57,900 central" relatively undefined. 277 00:08:57,900 --> 00:08:59,500 But when I say that social death 278 00:08:59,500 --> 00:09:01,200 is utterly central, I mean at 279 00:09:01,200 --> 00:09:03,400 least that it is a salient 280 00:09:03,400 --> 00:09:04,800 characteristic of most paradigm 281 00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:06,433 instances. 282 00:09:06,433 --> 00:09:07,833 Also, that it is a useful 283 00:09:07,833 --> 00:09:09,600 concept for appreciating the 284 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:14,033 kind of evil that genocide is. 285 00:09:14,033 --> 00:09:15,400 Social death enables us to 286 00:09:15,400 --> 00:09:16,966 distinguish genocide from other 287 00:09:16,966 --> 00:09:18,733 mass atrocities. 288 00:09:18,733 --> 00:09:20,500 It is useful for explaining in 289 00:09:20,500 --> 00:09:22,433 what sense genocide is a form of 290 00:09:22,433 --> 00:09:24,400 murder and how it differs from 291 00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:25,966 other murders. 292 00:09:25,966 --> 00:09:27,466 It helps for identifying the 293 00:09:27,466 --> 00:09:29,166 sorts of human groups that can 294 00:09:29,166 --> 00:09:31,533 be victims of genocide, which is 295 00:09:31,533 --> 00:09:32,833 a matter of some consequence in 296 00:09:32,833 --> 00:09:34,833 international law. 297 00:09:34,833 --> 00:09:36,033 It should be useful for 298 00:09:36,033 --> 00:09:37,133 identifying a 299 00:09:37,133 --> 00:09:38,400 genocide-in-progress, where 300 00:09:38,400 --> 00:09:39,900 intervention might interrupt it 301 00:09:39,900 --> 00:09:42,366 before it ran its course. 302 00:09:42,366 --> 00:09:43,933 It is a gross understatement to 303 00:09:43,933 --> 00:09:46,566 say genocide is wrong. 304 00:09:46,566 --> 00:09:48,600 Genocide is not just wrong. 305 00:09:48,600 --> 00:09:50,700 It is an evil, and not in the 306 00:09:50,700 --> 00:09:53,233 popular loose sense of "evil" 307 00:09:53,233 --> 00:09:55,233 that applies to anything bad or 308 00:09:55,233 --> 00:09:57,800 wrong but in that stricter, 309 00:09:57,800 --> 00:10:00,200 narrower, more specific sense in 310 00:10:00,200 --> 00:10:01,700 which "evil" is a very strong 311 00:10:01,700 --> 00:10:03,633 term of approbrium. 312 00:10:03,633 --> 00:10:06,166 According to some, including my 313 00:10:06,166 --> 00:10:07,600 teacher, Emeritus Professor 314 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:09,266 Marcus Singer, it is the 315 00:10:09,266 --> 00:10:10,933 strongest term of approbrium 316 00:10:10,933 --> 00:10:13,233 available to us. 317 00:10:13,233 --> 00:10:15,133 For the past decade and a half, 318 00:10:15,133 --> 00:10:16,633 I have focused my research and 319 00:10:16,633 --> 00:10:18,233 writing on evils and the concept 320 00:10:18,233 --> 00:10:19,500 of evil. 321 00:10:19,500 --> 00:10:21,166 In doing so, I have taken on two 322 00:10:21,166 --> 00:10:22,466 tasks. 323 00:10:22,466 --> 00:10:24,500 First, I try to distinguish 324 00:10:24,500 --> 00:10:26,533 evils from lesser wrongs and 325 00:10:26,533 --> 00:10:28,033 lesser bads. 326 00:10:28,033 --> 00:10:29,633 Evils, on my view, are not just 327 00:10:29,633 --> 00:10:31,400 worse, they are also more 328 00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:32,866 complex. 329 00:10:32,866 --> 00:10:34,766 The second kind of task has been 330 00:10:34,766 --> 00:10:36,633 to work through some tough moral 331 00:10:36,633 --> 00:10:39,000 and conceptual questions 332 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:40,133 regarding particular evils, 333 00:10:40,133 --> 00:10:42,400 especially, torture, terrorism, 334 00:10:42,400 --> 00:10:44,400 and genocide. 335 00:10:44,400 --> 00:10:46,500 To give you a quick overview, I 336 00:10:46,500 --> 00:10:48,266 come to different conclusions 337 00:10:48,266 --> 00:10:49,866 regarding terrorism, torture, 338 00:10:49,866 --> 00:10:51,266 and genocide. 339 00:10:51,266 --> 00:10:53,000 In the case of terrorism, I 340 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:54,433 found I had to allow the 341 00:10:54,433 --> 00:10:56,166 possibility that in some 342 00:10:56,166 --> 00:10:58,300 circumstances, in response to 343 00:10:58,300 --> 00:11:00,400 some atrocities, there are forms 344 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:03,300 of terrorism that are not evils, 345 00:11:03,300 --> 00:11:05,833 even if they are wrong, but 346 00:11:05,833 --> 00:11:07,666 those forms do not include 347 00:11:07,666 --> 00:11:10,033 torture or genocide. 348 00:11:10,033 --> 00:11:11,466 And by the way, genocide tends 349 00:11:11,466 --> 00:11:13,166 to include both torture and 350 00:11:13,166 --> 00:11:14,933 terrorism. 351 00:11:14,933 --> 00:11:16,966 The reason I find some forms of 352 00:11:16,966 --> 00:11:19,133 terrorism not evils is not that 353 00:11:19,133 --> 00:11:20,800 they are not extremely harmful, 354 00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:22,733 obviously they are, but that 355 00:11:22,733 --> 00:11:25,366 they can be if not justifiable, 356 00:11:25,366 --> 00:11:28,366 then at least partly excusable. 357 00:11:28,366 --> 00:11:30,133 In the case of torture, I defend 358 00:11:30,133 --> 00:11:31,600 the view that torture is an evil 359 00:11:31,600 --> 00:11:33,133 that should never be on the 360 00:11:33,133 --> 00:11:34,933 table as a permissible option, 361 00:11:34,933 --> 00:11:37,166 whether for an individual or a 362 00:11:37,166 --> 00:11:38,566 government, whether for a 363 00:11:38,566 --> 00:11:40,666 particular act or as a policy, 364 00:11:40,666 --> 00:11:43,233 even though, like slavery, 365 00:11:43,233 --> 00:11:44,600 torture is not wrong by 366 00:11:44,600 --> 00:11:46,033 definition. 367 00:11:46,033 --> 00:11:47,733 We can construct logically 368 00:11:47,733 --> 00:11:49,166 possible cases in which all the 369 00:11:49,166 --> 00:11:51,766 alternatives appear worse. 370 00:11:51,766 --> 00:11:53,233 I appeal, rather, to the moral 371 00:11:53,233 --> 00:11:55,566 costs of torture as well as to 372 00:11:55,566 --> 00:11:57,266 empirical probabilities 373 00:11:57,266 --> 00:11:59,100 regarding what we can know and 374 00:11:59,100 --> 00:12:01,333 what we can control. 375 00:12:01,333 --> 00:12:02,966 Because neither torture nor 376 00:12:02,966 --> 00:12:04,233 terrorism is wrong by 377 00:12:04,233 --> 00:12:05,666 definition, there is room for 378 00:12:05,666 --> 00:12:06,733 argument about their 379 00:12:06,733 --> 00:12:09,600 justifiability or excusability. 380 00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:11,933 In contrast, if genocide is 381 00:12:11,933 --> 00:12:13,400 understood as the murder of a 382 00:12:13,400 --> 00:12:15,033 people, there is no room for 383 00:12:15,033 --> 00:12:16,266 argument regarding its 384 00:12:16,266 --> 00:12:17,900 justifiability. 385 00:12:17,900 --> 00:12:19,533 Murder is, by definition, 386 00:12:19,533 --> 00:12:20,866 wrongful. 387 00:12:20,866 --> 00:12:22,866 Homicide can be justified, in 388 00:12:22,866 --> 00:12:24,800 self-defense, for example, 389 00:12:24,800 --> 00:12:26,300 murder cannot. 390 00:12:26,300 --> 00:12:27,533 Killing in justifiable 391 00:12:27,533 --> 00:12:29,566 self-defense is not murder. 392 00:12:29,566 --> 00:12:31,500 In this respect, the philosopher 393 00:12:31,500 --> 00:12:33,000 who confronts the phenomena of 394 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:34,566 genocide is in a position 395 00:12:34,566 --> 00:12:36,400 analogous to that of the 396 00:12:36,400 --> 00:12:37,833 philosopher who confronts the 397 00:12:37,833 --> 00:12:39,766 phenomena of rape. 398 00:12:39,766 --> 00:12:41,366 The question is not when, if 399 00:12:41,366 --> 00:12:43,266 ever, it is justified. 400 00:12:43,266 --> 00:12:45,366 The questions are, rather, how 401 00:12:45,366 --> 00:12:47,200 we are to recognize instances of 402 00:12:47,200 --> 00:12:49,333 it and how it might be morally 403 00:12:49,333 --> 00:12:51,933 justifiable to respond. 404 00:12:51,933 --> 00:12:53,300 And yet, it might seem an 405 00:12:53,300 --> 00:12:56,200 arbitrary stipulation, it seemed 406 00:12:56,200 --> 00:12:58,200 so to some of my first year FIG 407 00:12:58,200 --> 00:13:00,300 students a couple years ago, to 408 00:13:00,300 --> 00:13:02,266 say that genocide is wrong by 409 00:13:02,266 --> 00:13:03,666 definition. 410 00:13:03,666 --> 00:13:05,033 So I'll have more to say about 411 00:13:05,033 --> 00:13:07,133 that and in defense of my view 412 00:13:07,133 --> 00:13:09,033 that it is not an arbitrary 413 00:13:09,033 --> 00:13:10,566 stipulation. 414 00:13:10,566 --> 00:13:12,033 No scholars or politicians that 415 00:13:12,033 --> 00:13:13,800 I know of who have tried to 416 00:13:13,800 --> 00:13:15,966 define genocide have taken the 417 00:13:15,966 --> 00:13:17,433 view that it could ever be 418 00:13:17,433 --> 00:13:19,266 anything but wrong. 419 00:13:19,266 --> 00:13:21,600 The genocide convention of 1948 420 00:13:21,600 --> 00:13:23,733 took as its task the definition 421 00:13:23,733 --> 00:13:25,366 of a crime that had not 422 00:13:25,366 --> 00:13:27,366 previously been defined in 423 00:13:27,366 --> 00:13:29,133 international law. 424 00:13:29,133 --> 00:13:31,566 Still, it is a philosophically 425 00:13:31,566 --> 00:13:34,300 interesting question how, apart 426 00:13:34,300 --> 00:13:36,400 from size of the target, 427 00:13:36,400 --> 00:13:39,200 destroying an evil group differs 428 00:13:39,200 --> 00:13:41,266 from genocide. 429 00:13:41,266 --> 00:13:42,933 Consider, for example, the 430 00:13:42,933 --> 00:13:45,233 organization known in the 1940s 431 00:13:45,233 --> 00:13:47,066 as "Murder, Inc." 432 00:13:47,066 --> 00:13:49,300 and later as "the Syndicate" 433 00:13:49,300 --> 00:13:51,066 and "the Mob." 434 00:13:51,066 --> 00:13:52,733 This organization was described 435 00:13:52,733 --> 00:13:54,233 by authors of the book 436 00:13:54,233 --> 00:13:57,033 Murder, Inc. as a "fantastic 437 00:13:57,033 --> 00:13:58,833 ring of killers and 438 00:13:58,833 --> 00:14:00,966 extortionists" that constituted 439 00:14:00,966 --> 00:14:03,300 organized crime in the United 440 00:14:03,300 --> 00:14:04,700 States. 441 00:14:04,700 --> 00:14:05,900 They report that in one 442 00:14:05,900 --> 00:14:07,233 decade, Murder, Inc. was 443 00:14:07,233 --> 00:14:09,533 responsible for a thousand 444 00:14:09,533 --> 00:14:10,633 murders "from New England to 445 00:14:10,633 --> 00:14:11,900 California." 446 00:14:11,900 --> 00:14:13,166 If you think this group was too 447 00:14:13,166 --> 00:14:14,733 small or too thin to constitute 448 00:14:14,733 --> 00:14:16,766 a people, then, consider the Ku 449 00:14:16,766 --> 00:14:18,466 Klux Klan, a group much larger 450 00:14:18,466 --> 00:14:20,066 and more complex in its 451 00:14:20,066 --> 00:14:21,900 activities. 452 00:14:21,900 --> 00:14:23,900 When sociologist Kathy Blee 453 00:14:23,900 --> 00:14:25,900 interviewed women in Indiana who 454 00:14:25,900 --> 00:14:27,333 had been members of the Klan in 455 00:14:27,333 --> 00:14:29,500 the 1920s, they described it 456 00:14:29,500 --> 00:14:31,166 nostalgically as a way to 457 00:14:31,166 --> 00:14:33,033 socialize with like-minded 458 00:14:33,033 --> 00:14:34,566 others. 459 00:14:34,566 --> 00:14:36,866 Or, consider the Nazi Party. 460 00:14:36,866 --> 00:14:39,066 One reason I cite Murder, Inc. 461 00:14:39,066 --> 00:14:40,766 and the Klan is that I don't 462 00:14:40,766 --> 00:14:44,000 like to always be citing Nazis. 463 00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:45,266 [laughter] 464 00:14:45,266 --> 00:14:46,533 It seems more appropriate for 465 00:14:46,533 --> 00:14:48,233 me, as an American, to mention 466 00:14:48,233 --> 00:14:51,266 homegrown evil organizations. 467 00:14:51,266 --> 00:14:52,733 The vitality contributed to the 468 00:14:52,733 --> 00:14:54,033 lives of members of these 469 00:14:54,033 --> 00:14:55,800 organizations was easily as 470 00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:57,966 important to their lives as the 471 00:14:57,966 --> 00:14:59,666 vitality contributed by a 472 00:14:59,666 --> 00:15:02,533 national or religious culture. 473 00:15:02,533 --> 00:15:04,233 Many mass atrocities are 474 00:15:04,233 --> 00:15:05,966 recognized as genocides even 475 00:15:05,966 --> 00:15:07,533 though it is not clear that 476 00:15:07,533 --> 00:15:09,766 their victims are, strictly 477 00:15:09,766 --> 00:15:10,833 speaking, a people. 478 00:15:10,833 --> 00:15:12,300 The Cambodian genocide, for 479 00:15:12,300 --> 00:15:13,933 example, in which both 480 00:15:13,933 --> 00:15:15,866 perpetrators and victims 481 00:15:15,866 --> 00:15:19,133 belonged to the same people. 482 00:15:19,133 --> 00:15:20,566 On the view that social death is 483 00:15:20,566 --> 00:15:22,000 central to genocide, it should 484 00:15:22,000 --> 00:15:23,833 be natural to ask whether it 485 00:15:23,833 --> 00:15:25,500 would be committing genocide to 486 00:15:25,500 --> 00:15:27,533 destroy an evil group that gave 487 00:15:27,533 --> 00:15:28,933 meaning to the lives of its 488 00:15:28,933 --> 00:15:30,400 members. 489 00:15:30,400 --> 00:15:32,433 If it were, we could no longer 490 00:15:32,433 --> 00:15:33,666 define "genocide" as the " murder 491 00:15:33,666 --> 00:15:35,666 of a people" but would have to 492 00:15:35,666 --> 00:15:37,300 allow the possibility of 493 00:15:37,300 --> 00:15:39,633 justified genocides. 494 00:15:39,633 --> 00:15:41,233 I regard this as 495 00:15:41,233 --> 00:15:42,966 "the Murder, Inc. problem," 496 00:15:42,966 --> 00:15:45,400 and I will return to it. 497 00:15:45,400 --> 00:15:46,933 To show that genocide is always 498 00:15:46,933 --> 00:15:48,800 an evil, it is necessary first 499 00:15:48,800 --> 00:15:50,966 to say something about what 500 00:15:50,966 --> 00:15:53,300 conception of evil is in play 501 00:15:53,300 --> 00:15:57,033 here, and I turn to that next. 502 00:15:57,033 --> 00:16:01,200 Mine, of course. 503 00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:03,066 In my first evil book, 504 00:16:03,066 --> 00:16:05,000 The Atrocity Paradigm, 505 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:06,200 I developed a theory of evil 506 00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:07,533 that takes large-scale mass 507 00:16:07,533 --> 00:16:09,933 atrocities as paradigms. 508 00:16:09,933 --> 00:16:11,800 By a "paradigm," I mean an 509 00:16:11,800 --> 00:16:14,266 uncontroversial instance, 510 00:16:14,266 --> 00:16:15,700 something that is 511 00:16:15,700 --> 00:16:17,633 uncontroversially an evil. 512 00:16:17,633 --> 00:16:19,233 If large-scale mass atrocities 513 00:16:19,233 --> 00:16:20,600 are not evils, I cannot imagine 514 00:16:20,600 --> 00:16:22,300 what would be. 515 00:16:22,300 --> 00:16:24,166 My approach is secular. 516 00:16:24,166 --> 00:16:25,433 I do not presuppose a 517 00:16:25,433 --> 00:16:27,300 theological context, although my 518 00:16:27,300 --> 00:16:29,100 approach is compatible with most 519 00:16:29,100 --> 00:16:31,433 aspects of the theological 520 00:16:31,433 --> 00:16:34,333 problem of evil, which ponders 521 00:16:34,333 --> 00:16:36,300 how an omnipotent and perfectly 522 00:16:36,300 --> 00:16:38,033 good creator could create a 523 00:16:38,033 --> 00:16:40,366 world as flawed by evils as 524 00:16:40,366 --> 00:16:43,000 ours. 525 00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:46,200 My initial definition was that 526 00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:47,600 evils are, "reasonably 527 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:49,066 foreseeable intolerable harms, 528 00:16:49,066 --> 00:16:50,366 produced, maintained, 529 00:16:50,366 --> 00:16:52,833 aggravated, supported, and so on 530 00:16:52,833 --> 00:16:54,866 by culpable wrongdoing." 531 00:16:54,866 --> 00:16:57,300 I changed "culpable wrongdoing" 532 00:16:57,300 --> 00:16:59,233 to "inexcusable wrongs" in my 533 00:16:59,233 --> 00:17:02,333 second evil book, that is, 534 00:17:02,333 --> 00:17:04,900 Confronting Evils: Terrorism, 535 00:17:04,900 --> 00:17:06,366 Torture, and Genocide . 536 00:17:06,366 --> 00:17:07,700 The resulting revised definition 537 00:17:07,700 --> 00:17:09,833 is that evils are reasonably 538 00:17:09,833 --> 00:17:14,233 foreseeable intolerable harms, 539 00:17:14,233 --> 00:17:15,333 produced, maintained, 540 00:17:15,333 --> 00:17:17,333 aggravated, supported, and so on 541 00:17:17,333 --> 00:17:19,900 by inexcusable wrongs. 542 00:17:19,900 --> 00:17:21,500 So understood, evils have two 543 00:17:21,500 --> 00:17:24,100 basic, irreducibly distinct 544 00:17:24,100 --> 00:17:26,533 component, an agency component 545 00:17:26,533 --> 00:17:28,666 and a harm component, connected 546 00:17:28,666 --> 00:17:30,533 by reasonably foreseeable 547 00:17:30,533 --> 00:17:32,066 causality. 548 00:17:32,066 --> 00:17:33,700 Notice that I take the noun 549 00:17:33,700 --> 00:17:35,833 "evils," plural, as the basic 550 00:17:35,833 --> 00:17:37,633 concept. 551 00:17:37,633 --> 00:17:39,333 I am not interested in the idea 552 00:17:39,333 --> 00:17:41,033 of evil as a mysterious or 553 00:17:41,033 --> 00:17:43,200 metaphysical force. 554 00:17:43,200 --> 00:17:45,166 I treat adjectival uses of 555 00:17:45,166 --> 00:17:46,533 "evil" as derivative from the 556 00:17:46,533 --> 00:17:48,166 noun use. 557 00:17:48,166 --> 00:17:50,133 An evil intention, for example, 558 00:17:50,133 --> 00:17:52,800 is an intention, without excuse, 559 00:17:52,800 --> 00:17:54,133 to do reasonably foreseeable 560 00:17:54,133 --> 00:17:55,933 intolerable harm. 561 00:17:55,933 --> 00:17:57,400 An evil practice is one that 562 00:17:57,400 --> 00:17:59,133 inexcusably does reasonably 563 00:17:59,133 --> 00:18:01,466 foreseeable intolerable harm. 564 00:18:01,466 --> 00:18:04,833 A practice that is inexcusable 565 00:18:04,833 --> 00:18:06,600 today might have been excusable 566 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:09,533 in the past, not then an evil 567 00:18:09,533 --> 00:18:11,266 but an evil today. 568 00:18:11,266 --> 00:18:13,700 Perhaps some forms of slavery 569 00:18:13,700 --> 00:18:15,366 My motivating interest is in 570 00:18:15,366 --> 00:18:17,200 identifying deeds, practices, 571 00:18:17,200 --> 00:18:19,366 and institutions that are evils, 572 00:18:19,366 --> 00:18:21,633 not in labeling perpetrators, 573 00:18:21,633 --> 00:18:23,066 even though I think that can 574 00:18:23,066 --> 00:18:24,900 sometimes be done. 575 00:18:24,900 --> 00:18:26,400 I want to highlight more the 576 00:18:26,400 --> 00:18:27,933 plight of victims and resist 577 00:18:27,933 --> 00:18:29,833 becoming immersed in perpetrator 578 00:18:29,833 --> 00:18:31,633 psychology. 579 00:18:31,633 --> 00:18:33,366 This is an ethical conception of 580 00:18:33,366 --> 00:18:35,200 evils in that it presupposes the 581 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:37,466 idea of moral wrongs. 582 00:18:37,466 --> 00:18:39,433 Atrocities do not include 583 00:18:39,433 --> 00:18:41,600 natural catastrophes, although 584 00:18:41,600 --> 00:18:43,166 natural catastrophes can be just 585 00:18:43,166 --> 00:18:44,800 as harmful. 586 00:18:44,800 --> 00:18:46,166 I will not try to define 587 00:18:46,166 --> 00:18:47,333 "wrongs." 588 00:18:47,333 --> 00:18:49,000 But my definition of evils is 589 00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:50,266 compatible with many 590 00:18:50,266 --> 00:18:52,266 non-utilitarian theories of the 591 00:18:52,266 --> 00:18:53,766 distinction between right and 592 00:18:53,766 --> 00:18:55,200 wrong. 593 00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:57,200 Key concepts that require 594 00:18:57,200 --> 00:18:58,233 clarification then are 595 00:18:58,233 --> 00:19:00,266 "intolerable" in the 596 00:19:00,266 --> 00:19:02,066 "intolerable harm," and 597 00:19:02,066 --> 00:19:03,900 "inexcusable" in "inexcusable 598 00:19:03,900 --> 00:19:07,666 wrongs." 599 00:19:07,666 --> 00:19:10,233 To show that social death is 600 00:19:10,233 --> 00:19:12,466 necessarily evil I need to 601 00:19:12,466 --> 00:19:14,433 to show that it's intolerably 602 00:19:14,433 --> 00:19:15,966 harmful. 603 00:19:15,966 --> 00:19:17,366 I take it that's obvious, so I'm 604 00:19:17,366 --> 00:19:18,633 not going to spend any time on 605 00:19:18,633 --> 00:19:20,033 that. 606 00:19:20,033 --> 00:19:21,400 That it's always wrong. 607 00:19:21,400 --> 00:19:22,666 There's where I'm going to focus 608 00:19:22,666 --> 00:19:23,900 my attention. 609 00:19:23,900 --> 00:19:25,166 And that there's no excuse for 610 00:19:25,166 --> 00:19:26,200 it. 611 00:19:26,200 --> 00:19:27,466 To show that there's no excuse 612 00:19:27,466 --> 00:19:29,000 for it would require me to get 613 00:19:29,000 --> 00:19:31,433 into perpetrator psychology in a 614 00:19:31,433 --> 00:19:32,766 way that I don't want to do 615 00:19:32,766 --> 00:19:34,766 tonight. 616 00:19:38,500 --> 00:19:42,433 By intolerable harms what I 617 00:19:42,433 --> 00:19:46,333 mean is substantial deprivations 618 00:19:46,333 --> 00:19:47,900 of basics that are ordinarily 619 00:19:47,900 --> 00:19:49,800 necessary for a life or a 620 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:51,733 death to be decent. 621 00:19:51,733 --> 00:19:53,133 That is, decent for the person 622 00:19:53,133 --> 00:19:54,400 whose life or death 623 00:19:54,400 --> 00:19:55,100 it is. 624 00:19:55,100 --> 00:19:56,500 Such basics, in the case of a 625 00:19:56,500 --> 00:19:59,700 life include such things as 626 00:19:59,700 --> 00:20:01,566 access to non-toxic air, water, 627 00:20:01,566 --> 00:20:03,600 and food, the ability to move 628 00:20:03,600 --> 00:20:06,033 your limbs, to sit, stand, or 629 00:20:06,033 --> 00:20:07,433 lie down, to make choices and 630 00:20:07,433 --> 00:20:09,166 act on some of them, to have 631 00:20:09,166 --> 00:20:11,000 affective bonds with others and 632 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:13,166 interaction with some of them, 633 00:20:13,166 --> 00:20:15,066 to be free from severe and 634 00:20:15,066 --> 00:20:17,200 unremitting pain or humiliation, 635 00:20:17,200 --> 00:20:18,266 and so on. 636 00:20:18,266 --> 00:20:19,766 These are things that cut across 637 00:20:19,766 --> 00:20:21,366 cultural differences and stem 638 00:20:21,366 --> 00:20:23,433 from our common needs, not only 639 00:20:23,433 --> 00:20:26,133 as members of a species but 640 00:20:26,133 --> 00:20:27,933 as mammals. 641 00:20:27,933 --> 00:20:29,900 How much deprivation? 642 00:20:29,900 --> 00:20:31,600 Enough to make a life or death 643 00:20:31,600 --> 00:20:33,633 indecent, and so intolerable, 644 00:20:33,633 --> 00:20:35,166 for the person whose life or 645 00:20:35,166 --> 00:20:36,700 death it is. 646 00:20:36,700 --> 00:20:38,433 What makes a harm intolerable is 647 00:20:38,433 --> 00:20:39,866 not primarily a matter of 648 00:20:39,866 --> 00:20:41,600 subjective preference, even if 649 00:20:41,600 --> 00:20:43,133 subjective preference is not 650 00:20:43,133 --> 00:20:45,066 totally eliminable. 651 00:20:45,066 --> 00:20:46,966 This is a normative conception 652 00:20:46,966 --> 00:20:48,933 of the intolerable, not what 653 00:20:48,933 --> 00:20:50,533 you cannot in fact tolerate but 654 00:20:50,533 --> 00:20:51,800 more like what you shouldn't 655 00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:53,033 have to. 656 00:20:53,033 --> 00:20:54,500 Millions tolerate the 657 00:20:54,500 --> 00:20:56,866 intolerable daily. 658 00:20:56,866 --> 00:20:59,866 Next, let's consider inexcusable 659 00:20:59,866 --> 00:21:01,466 wrongs. 660 00:21:01,466 --> 00:21:02,933 Wrongs can be inexcusable in 661 00:21:02,933 --> 00:21:05,166 either of two ways, and evils 662 00:21:05,166 --> 00:21:07,166 are inexcusable in both. 663 00:21:07,166 --> 00:21:08,800 First, what I call a 664 00:21:08,800 --> 00:21:11,033 metaphysical excuse exists when 665 00:21:11,033 --> 00:21:12,433 you act under diminished 666 00:21:12,433 --> 00:21:14,633 capacity, such as physical 667 00:21:14,633 --> 00:21:17,833 disability or mental illness. 668 00:21:17,833 --> 00:21:19,366 Second, what I call a moral 669 00:21:19,366 --> 00:21:21,533 excuse exists when you have a 670 00:21:21,533 --> 00:21:23,766 partial moral justification. 671 00:21:23,766 --> 00:21:25,433 There is some excuse, morally 672 00:21:25,433 --> 00:21:27,300 speaking, when you have some 673 00:21:27,300 --> 00:21:28,600 good moral reason for what you 674 00:21:28,600 --> 00:21:30,700 did, even though that reason is 675 00:21:30,700 --> 00:21:32,900 not good enough to justify your 676 00:21:32,900 --> 00:21:35,166 deed on the whole. 677 00:21:35,166 --> 00:21:36,666 What is justified, of course, 678 00:21:36,666 --> 00:21:38,266 needs no excuse. 679 00:21:38,266 --> 00:21:39,733 There is usually some reason for 680 00:21:39,733 --> 00:21:41,033 any deed. 681 00:21:41,033 --> 00:21:42,400 But not every reason carries 682 00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:43,600 moral weight. 683 00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:45,066 When it does not, if the deed is 684 00:21:45,066 --> 00:21:46,400 wrong, there is no moral excuse 685 00:21:46,400 --> 00:21:47,666 for it. 686 00:21:47,666 --> 00:21:49,000 Evils, on my view, are 687 00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:50,933 inexcusable both metaphysically 688 00:21:50,933 --> 00:21:52,500 and morally. 689 00:21:52,500 --> 00:21:54,000 Perhaps it is too strong to say 690 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:56,133 there is absolutely no moral or 691 00:21:56,133 --> 00:21:58,633 metaphysical excuse for an evil. 692 00:21:58,633 --> 00:22:00,800 It may be more plausible to say 693 00:22:00,800 --> 00:22:02,200 there is nothing approaching a 694 00:22:02,200 --> 00:22:03,933 very good moral reason, allowing 695 00:22:03,933 --> 00:22:06,333 that there may be trivial ones, 696 00:22:06,333 --> 00:22:08,166 and there is no significantly 697 00:22:08,166 --> 00:22:10,133 diminished capacity to act, 698 00:22:10,133 --> 00:22:11,666 allowing for the possibility of 699 00:22:11,666 --> 00:22:13,500 some degree of difficulty. 700 00:22:13,500 --> 00:22:15,300 Those are basically friendly 701 00:22:15,300 --> 00:22:16,800 amendments. 702 00:22:16,800 --> 00:22:18,400 Further, as I understand a moral 703 00:22:18,400 --> 00:22:20,100 reason, a reason that carries 704 00:22:20,100 --> 00:22:21,633 some moral weight for some deeds 705 00:22:21,633 --> 00:22:23,566 may carry none at all for 706 00:22:23,566 --> 00:22:25,933 other deed. 707 00:22:25,933 --> 00:22:27,300 For example, the fact that 708 00:22:27,300 --> 00:22:28,600 someone's feelings would be hurt 709 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:29,866 if you did or didn't do 710 00:22:29,866 --> 00:22:31,633 something carries some moral 711 00:22:31,633 --> 00:22:33,900 weight as a reason to not always 712 00:22:33,900 --> 00:22:36,233 speak frankly, but carries no 713 00:22:36,233 --> 00:22:38,500 moral weight at all as a reason 714 00:22:38,500 --> 00:22:40,900 to kill someone. 715 00:22:40,900 --> 00:22:43,833 The etymology of "genocide" 716 00:22:43,833 --> 00:22:45,433 leaves open the question whether 717 00:22:45,433 --> 00:22:48,133 it is necessarily an evil. 718 00:22:48,133 --> 00:22:50,000 The word "genocide," as I 719 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:51,533 mentioned, is of relatively 720 00:22:51,533 --> 00:22:52,700 recent origin. 721 00:22:52,700 --> 00:22:54,200 It was not a crime charged at 722 00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:56,733 Nuremberg in 1945. 723 00:22:56,733 --> 00:22:58,233 But scholars tend to agree that 724 00:22:58,233 --> 00:22:59,833 the practice is ancient, 725 00:22:59,833 --> 00:23:01,500 extending at least back to the 726 00:23:01,500 --> 00:23:03,933 5th century destruction of the 727 00:23:03,933 --> 00:23:06,166 people of the island of Melos by 728 00:23:06,166 --> 00:23:07,833 the Athenians. 729 00:23:07,833 --> 00:23:09,533 Archeological evidence suggests 730 00:23:09,533 --> 00:23:11,466 that it goes probably further 731 00:23:11,466 --> 00:23:13,900 back than recorded history. 732 00:23:13,900 --> 00:23:15,066 By the way, although the 733 00:23:15,066 --> 00:23:15,966 destruction of the people of the 734 00:23:15,966 --> 00:23:17,700 island of Melos is generally 735 00:23:17,700 --> 00:23:20,266 regarded as a genocide, the 736 00:23:20,266 --> 00:23:22,433 Athenians did not kill everyone. 737 00:23:22,433 --> 00:23:23,666 They killed the men, and 738 00:23:23,666 --> 00:23:25,966 enslaved women and children 739 00:23:25,966 --> 00:23:27,500 which was a common practice at 740 00:23:27,500 --> 00:23:28,900 the time. 741 00:23:28,900 --> 00:23:30,166 The result was that the people 742 00:23:30,166 --> 00:23:31,766 of the island was destroyed as a 743 00:23:31,766 --> 00:23:33,733 people. 744 00:23:33,733 --> 00:23:35,533 The hybrid term "genocide" 745 00:23:35,533 --> 00:23:37,933 was coined by Raphael Lemkin 746 00:23:37,933 --> 00:23:39,833 who was a Polish Jewish attorney 747 00:23:39,833 --> 00:23:41,266 who came to the United States 748 00:23:41,266 --> 00:23:43,100 as a refugee from Hitler. 749 00:23:43,100 --> 00:23:45,333 He combined the Greek "genos" 750 00:23:45,333 --> 00:23:47,733 which meant tribe or race, 751 00:23:47,733 --> 00:23:50,233 with the Latin "cide," killing, 752 00:23:50,233 --> 00:23:52,233 to form the hybrid "genocide," 753 00:23:52,233 --> 00:23:53,400 the "killing, or cutting down, 754 00:23:53,400 --> 00:23:54,666 of a people." 755 00:23:54,666 --> 00:23:55,833 Genocide is one of those 756 00:23:55,833 --> 00:23:58,466 Greek/Latin hybrid concepts, 757 00:23:58,466 --> 00:24:00,333 like homosexual, where "homo" 758 00:24:00,333 --> 00:24:02,266 means "same," as in Greek, not 759 00:24:02,266 --> 00:24:04,133 "man," as in Latin; 760 00:24:04,133 --> 00:24:05,800 anthropocentric, human centered, 761 00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:07,433 is another. 762 00:24:07,433 --> 00:24:09,066 The Latin "cide" is from a verb 763 00:24:09,066 --> 00:24:10,466 that meant "to cut down." 764 00:24:10,466 --> 00:24:11,766 It could be applied cutting 765 00:24:11,766 --> 00:24:13,933 down trees but was also used to 766 00:24:13,933 --> 00:24:15,133 mean "to kill." 767 00:24:15,133 --> 00:24:17,500 I have to thank to my colleagues 768 00:24:17,500 --> 00:24:19,266 who read Latin for this bit of 769 00:24:19,266 --> 00:24:20,866 information, Steve Nadler and 770 00:24:20,866 --> 00:24:22,566 Paula Gottlieb. 771 00:24:22,566 --> 00:24:23,866 And so, etymology seems to leave 772 00:24:23,866 --> 00:24:25,166 open the question of 773 00:24:25,166 --> 00:24:26,900 justifiability, which means that 774 00:24:26,900 --> 00:24:29,233 more needs to be said to justify 775 00:24:29,233 --> 00:24:31,466 understanding genocide as not 776 00:24:31,466 --> 00:24:33,166 just a kind of destruction but 777 00:24:33,166 --> 00:24:34,833 as a kind of murder. 778 00:24:34,833 --> 00:24:36,333 Knowing something of the history 779 00:24:36,333 --> 00:24:37,866 of Lemkin's coinage of this 780 00:24:37,866 --> 00:24:39,733 concept is helpful. 781 00:24:39,733 --> 00:24:41,333 Lemkin began agitating for an 782 00:24:41,333 --> 00:24:43,833 international recognition of the 783 00:24:43,833 --> 00:24:46,833 crime of genocide in the 1930s. 784 00:24:46,833 --> 00:24:48,200 His paradigm was the Turks' 785 00:24:48,200 --> 00:24:49,566 slaughter of the Armenian 786 00:24:49,566 --> 00:24:52,200 Christians in 1915, under cover 787 00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:55,866 of WWI and led by Talat Pasha, 788 00:24:55,866 --> 00:24:57,566 one of the leaders of the 789 00:24:57,566 --> 00:24:59,633 Committee of Union and Progress 790 00:24:59,633 --> 00:25:00,900 that controlled the Ottoman 791 00:25:00,900 --> 00:25:02,233 Empire during the First 792 00:25:02,233 --> 00:25:04,233 World War. 793 00:25:04,233 --> 00:25:05,800 The slaughter of the Armenians 794 00:25:05,800 --> 00:25:08,533 was also a paradigm for Hitler, 795 00:25:08,533 --> 00:25:09,900 who asked, "Who today speaks of 796 00:25:09,900 --> 00:25:11,900 the Armenians?" 797 00:25:11,900 --> 00:25:13,466 To this day, Turkey denies 798 00:25:13,466 --> 00:25:14,733 that the slaughter of the 799 00:25:14,733 --> 00:25:16,633 Armenians was a genocide, and 800 00:25:16,633 --> 00:25:18,066 the United States officially 801 00:25:18,066 --> 00:25:20,100 agrees, presumably to maintain 802 00:25:20,100 --> 00:25:22,633 good relations with Turkey. 803 00:25:22,633 --> 00:25:23,800 But there appears to be 804 00:25:23,800 --> 00:25:25,100 consensus among genocide 805 00:25:25,100 --> 00:25:27,800 scholars that it was. 806 00:25:27,800 --> 00:25:29,733 Lemkin's issue was this: Piracy 807 00:25:29,733 --> 00:25:31,700 was a crime under international 808 00:25:31,700 --> 00:25:33,933 law, but there was no crime for 809 00:25:33,933 --> 00:25:35,433 which Talat Pasha could be 810 00:25:35,433 --> 00:25:37,533 prosecuted under international 811 00:25:37,533 --> 00:25:40,200 law for master-minding the 812 00:25:40,200 --> 00:25:42,200 slaughter of the Armenians. 813 00:25:42,200 --> 00:25:44,533 This struck Lemkin as absurd; 814 00:25:44,533 --> 00:25:45,866 surely, the extermination of a 815 00:25:45,866 --> 00:25:47,333 people is worse than an act of 816 00:25:47,333 --> 00:25:49,566 piracy. 817 00:25:49,566 --> 00:25:51,000 Eventually, Talat Pasha was 818 00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:52,700 assassinated by a young Armenian 819 00:25:52,700 --> 00:25:55,733 survivor, Soghomon Tehlirian who 820 00:25:55,733 --> 00:25:57,500 was then tried and acquitted on 821 00:25:57,500 --> 00:25:59,800 grounds that we would call today 822 00:25:59,800 --> 00:26:02,500 "temporary insanity." 823 00:26:02,500 --> 00:26:04,466 Again, Lemkin was outraged. 824 00:26:04,466 --> 00:26:08,766 This time he was outraged that 825 00:26:08,766 --> 00:26:11,000 it could be a prosecutable crime 826 00:26:11,000 --> 00:26:12,700 for Tehlirian to assassinate 827 00:26:12,700 --> 00:26:14,766 Talat Pasha but not a crime for 828 00:26:14,766 --> 00:26:16,100 Talat Pasha to have the 829 00:26:16,100 --> 00:26:18,300 Armenians slaughtered, and that 830 00:26:18,300 --> 00:26:20,300 the only way to hold Talat Pasha 831 00:26:20,300 --> 00:26:23,000 accountable was assassination, 832 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:24,733 rather than due process of law. 833 00:26:24,733 --> 00:26:27,633 And so Lemkin agitated for years 834 00:26:27,633 --> 00:26:29,100 for an international convention 835 00:26:29,100 --> 00:26:31,400 to define the crime of genocide. 836 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:33,400 It took place in 1948. 837 00:26:38,133 --> 00:26:39,400 The 1948 Genocide Convention 838 00:26:39,400 --> 00:26:41,166 was accepted by the U.N. the 839 00:26:41,166 --> 00:26:42,933 same month as the International 840 00:26:42,933 --> 00:26:45,233 Declaration of Human Rights. 841 00:26:45,233 --> 00:26:47,000 Its definition is the most 842 00:26:47,000 --> 00:26:49,166 widely cited. 843 00:26:49,166 --> 00:26:51,933 "Genocide means any of the 844 00:26:51,933 --> 00:26:54,000 following acts committed with 845 00:26:54,000 --> 00:26:56,366 the intent to destroy, in whole 846 00:26:56,366 --> 00:26:59,200 or in part, a nation, ethnical, 847 00:26:59,200 --> 00:27:01,133 racial, or religious group, as 848 00:27:01,133 --> 00:27:02,533 such-- 849 00:27:02,533 --> 00:27:06,733 And here are the following acts; 850 00:27:06,733 --> 00:27:09,066 killing members of the group, 851 00:27:09,066 --> 00:27:10,833 causing serious bodily or mental 852 00:27:10,833 --> 00:27:12,700 harm to members of the group, 853 00:27:12,700 --> 00:27:14,100 deliberately inflicting on the 854 00:27:14,100 --> 00:27:15,866 group conditions of life 855 00:27:15,866 --> 00:27:17,300 calculated to bring about its 856 00:27:17,300 --> 00:27:19,033 physical destruction in whole or 857 00:27:19,033 --> 00:27:21,666 in part, imposing measures 858 00:27:21,666 --> 00:27:23,466 intended to prevent births 859 00:27:23,466 --> 00:27:25,033 within the group, and forcibly 860 00:27:25,033 --> 00:27:26,433 transferring children of the 861 00:27:26,433 --> 00:27:28,633 group to another group." 862 00:27:28,633 --> 00:27:30,666 Not until the 1990s was this 863 00:27:30,666 --> 00:27:33,400 Convention actually enforced. 864 00:27:33,400 --> 00:27:34,700 The United States did not ratify 865 00:27:34,700 --> 00:27:37,300 it until the late 1980s under 866 00:27:37,300 --> 00:27:38,966 President Reagan. 867 00:27:38,966 --> 00:27:40,366 Wisconsin Senator William 868 00:27:40,366 --> 00:27:42,433 Proxmire had made a speech to 869 00:27:42,433 --> 00:27:44,200 the Senate every day for 19 870 00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:48,300 years urging its ratification. 871 00:27:48,300 --> 00:27:49,500 Every clause of the U.N. 872 00:27:49,500 --> 00:27:50,966 definition has been 873 00:27:50,966 --> 00:27:53,233 controversial: the scope and 874 00:27:53,233 --> 00:27:55,233 content of "intent," the meaning 875 00:27:55,233 --> 00:27:58,333 of "in whole or in part," and 876 00:27:58,333 --> 00:27:59,533 the scope of the whole 877 00:27:59,533 --> 00:28:01,700 definition: is it too narrow 878 00:28:01,700 --> 00:28:03,233 because it names only four kinds 879 00:28:03,233 --> 00:28:05,366 of groups and only five kinds of 880 00:28:05,366 --> 00:28:06,900 activity? 881 00:28:06,900 --> 00:28:08,033 Does it threaten to be too 882 00:28:08,033 --> 00:28:09,233 broad, because of the 883 00:28:09,233 --> 00:28:11,333 non-homicidal acts it includes 884 00:28:11,333 --> 00:28:13,133 as apparently sufficient when 885 00:28:13,133 --> 00:28:14,233 coupled with the right sort of 886 00:28:14,233 --> 00:28:15,933 intent? 887 00:28:15,933 --> 00:28:17,733 Let's start with intent. 888 00:28:17,733 --> 00:28:19,933 If intent is understood narrowly 889 00:28:19,933 --> 00:28:22,066 to mean aim, then the 890 00:28:22,066 --> 00:28:23,733 destruction of a people as a 891 00:28:23,733 --> 00:28:25,166 reasonably foreseeable 892 00:28:25,166 --> 00:28:27,000 consequence that was neither an 893 00:28:27,000 --> 00:28:29,433 aim nor a means to an aim would 894 00:28:29,433 --> 00:28:32,200 not count, on this definition, 895 00:28:32,200 --> 00:28:33,633 as genocide. 896 00:28:33,633 --> 00:28:35,200 It would be merely 897 00:28:35,200 --> 00:28:36,900 "collateral damage". 898 00:28:36,900 --> 00:28:38,466 And so, for example, the deaths 899 00:28:38,466 --> 00:28:40,366 of millions of Native Americans 900 00:28:40,366 --> 00:28:41,833 from diseases brought over by 901 00:28:41,833 --> 00:28:43,700 Europeans would not count as 902 00:28:43,700 --> 00:28:45,600 genocides except where those 903 00:28:45,600 --> 00:28:47,633 deaths were aimed at. 904 00:28:47,633 --> 00:28:49,800 Using this narrow understanding 905 00:28:49,800 --> 00:28:52,500 of "intent," Hugo Adam Bedau 906 00:28:52,500 --> 00:28:53,833 who is known for his campaign 907 00:28:53,833 --> 00:28:55,833 against the death penalty wrote 908 00:28:55,833 --> 00:28:57,100 an essay defending the United 909 00:28:57,100 --> 00:28:58,900 States in Vietnam against the 910 00:28:58,900 --> 00:29:01,433 charge of genocide raised by the 911 00:29:01,433 --> 00:29:03,500 Jean-Paul Sartre/Bertrand 912 00:29:03,500 --> 00:29:05,333 Russell genocide convention that 913 00:29:05,333 --> 00:29:06,500 was held-- I'll bet you didn't 914 00:29:06,500 --> 00:29:07,966 know about that. 915 00:29:07,966 --> 00:29:09,366 That was held in 1967 in 916 00:29:09,366 --> 00:29:12,033 Stockholm and Copenhagen. 917 00:29:12,033 --> 00:29:14,066 But if we understand more 918 00:29:14,066 --> 00:29:16,600 broadly as part of one's intent 919 00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:18,100 the reasonably foreseeable 920 00:29:18,100 --> 00:29:19,666 consequences that one is 921 00:29:19,666 --> 00:29:21,133 prepared to accept as the price 922 00:29:21,133 --> 00:29:23,500 of attaining one's aim, even 923 00:29:23,500 --> 00:29:25,000 though they are not instrumental 924 00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:27,066 toward its attainment, then 925 00:29:27,066 --> 00:29:28,733 maybe the case of at least some 926 00:29:28,733 --> 00:29:30,566 of the Native American nations 927 00:29:30,566 --> 00:29:32,266 that died from European diseases 928 00:29:32,266 --> 00:29:34,033 is not so clear. 929 00:29:34,033 --> 00:29:35,600 On this broader understanding of 930 00:29:35,600 --> 00:29:38,100 intent, it has been argued that 931 00:29:38,100 --> 00:29:40,866 Josef Stalin's economic policies 932 00:29:40,866 --> 00:29:42,633 that resulted in the starvation 933 00:29:42,633 --> 00:29:43,966 of millions of Ukrainian 934 00:29:43,966 --> 00:29:47,400 peasants in 1932-33 were 935 00:29:47,400 --> 00:29:49,100 genocidal, because those 936 00:29:49,100 --> 00:29:50,600 consequences were utterly 937 00:29:50,600 --> 00:29:52,266 foreseeable by those who were 938 00:29:52,266 --> 00:29:53,700 responsible. 939 00:29:53,700 --> 00:29:55,400 It was not a means but a price 940 00:29:55,400 --> 00:29:57,500 that Stalin was willing to pay 941 00:29:57,500 --> 00:29:59,600 to achieve his aims. 942 00:29:59,600 --> 00:30:01,333 I'll save, for the moment, the 943 00:30:01,333 --> 00:30:02,933 questions regarding "in whole or 944 00:30:02,933 --> 00:30:04,466 in part," because addressing 945 00:30:04,466 --> 00:30:06,100 those questions will lead me to 946 00:30:06,100 --> 00:30:07,700 Lemkin's alternative definition 947 00:30:07,700 --> 00:30:10,366 of genocide. 948 00:30:10,366 --> 00:30:12,433 Regarding the scope of the U.N. 949 00:30:12,433 --> 00:30:13,866 definition, the question of 950 00:30:13,866 --> 00:30:15,500 narrowness has been raised both 951 00:30:15,500 --> 00:30:17,000 in regard to the acts and in 952 00:30:17,000 --> 00:30:19,600 regard to the groups enumerated. 953 00:30:19,600 --> 00:30:21,400 In regard to acts, some have 954 00:30:21,400 --> 00:30:23,500 asked why only these and not 955 00:30:23,500 --> 00:30:26,533 others, such as forcible 956 00:30:26,533 --> 00:30:28,600 expulsion or rape aimed at 957 00:30:28,600 --> 00:30:31,166 enforced pregnancy? 958 00:30:31,166 --> 00:30:32,433 But the U.N. definition, as 959 00:30:32,433 --> 00:30:34,500 stated, does not preclude a 960 00:30:34,500 --> 00:30:35,733 continuation of the list of 961 00:30:35,733 --> 00:30:36,733 acts. 962 00:30:36,733 --> 00:30:37,733 It doesn't say these are the 963 00:30:37,733 --> 00:30:39,000 only ones. 964 00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:40,600 Since the 1990s wars in the 965 00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:42,466 former Yugoslavia, it has come 966 00:30:42,466 --> 00:30:44,200 to be widely understood that 967 00:30:44,200 --> 00:30:46,633 mass rape can be among acts 968 00:30:46,633 --> 00:30:48,766 constitutive of genocide. 969 00:30:48,766 --> 00:30:50,300 That war also raises the 970 00:30:50,300 --> 00:30:52,200 question of mass expulsion, 971 00:30:52,200 --> 00:30:53,433 which should get us to think 972 00:30:53,433 --> 00:30:54,900 about whether Spain's expulsions 973 00:30:54,900 --> 00:30:57,000 of the Jews in the late 15th 974 00:30:57,000 --> 00:30:58,733 century and of the Moriscos in 975 00:30:58,733 --> 00:31:01,033 the 17th century were instances 976 00:31:01,033 --> 00:31:03,100 of genocide. 977 00:31:03,100 --> 00:31:05,266 Depending on how it is done, 978 00:31:05,266 --> 00:31:06,800 mass expulsion has the potential 979 00:31:06,800 --> 00:31:09,033 to become genocidal. 980 00:31:09,033 --> 00:31:10,400 Expulsion of the Armenian 981 00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:12,000 Christians could be argued to be 982 00:31:12,000 --> 00:31:14,066 genocidal not only because of 983 00:31:14,066 --> 00:31:16,133 the shootings but because of the 984 00:31:16,133 --> 00:31:17,766 well-known harsh environmental 985 00:31:17,766 --> 00:31:19,500 conditions under which the 986 00:31:19,500 --> 00:31:22,900 Armenians were forced to flee. 987 00:31:22,900 --> 00:31:24,966 In regard to groups named, many 988 00:31:24,966 --> 00:31:26,400 have asked, why limit possible 989 00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:28,833 targets of genocide to 990 00:31:28,833 --> 00:31:31,400 "national, ethnical, racial, or 991 00:31:31,400 --> 00:31:32,933 religious" groups? 992 00:31:32,933 --> 00:31:34,000 Why not include political 993 00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:35,666 groups? 994 00:31:35,666 --> 00:31:36,966 And what about targeting the 995 00:31:36,966 --> 00:31:38,000 disabled? 996 00:31:38,000 --> 00:31:39,033 What about gays? 997 00:31:39,033 --> 00:31:39,866 females? 998 00:31:39,866 --> 00:31:40,933 evil groups? 999 00:31:40,933 --> 00:31:42,233 Whether to include political 1000 00:31:42,233 --> 00:31:43,500 groups was controversial during 1001 00:31:43,500 --> 00:31:45,233 the convention. 1002 00:31:45,233 --> 00:31:46,666 Political commitments are as 1003 00:31:46,666 --> 00:31:48,066 important and definitive for 1004 00:31:48,066 --> 00:31:49,500 some people as religious 1005 00:31:49,500 --> 00:31:51,900 commitments are for others. 1006 00:31:51,900 --> 00:31:53,333 Political communities as well as 1007 00:31:53,333 --> 00:31:54,800 religious communities give 1008 00:31:54,800 --> 00:31:56,000 meaning and shape to the lives 1009 00:31:56,000 --> 00:31:57,466 of their members. 1010 00:31:57,466 --> 00:31:58,900 Some have argued that the 1011 00:31:58,900 --> 00:32:00,366 definition should include only 1012 00:32:00,366 --> 00:32:02,466 groups into which you are born, 1013 00:32:02,466 --> 00:32:04,500 about which you have no choice. 1014 00:32:04,500 --> 00:32:06,266 But that is not necessarily true 1015 00:32:06,266 --> 00:32:08,233 of religious groups and national 1016 00:32:08,233 --> 00:32:09,966 groups. 1017 00:32:09,966 --> 00:32:11,166 Some prefer the term 1018 00:32:11,166 --> 00:32:13,366 "politicide" for elimination of 1019 00:32:13,366 --> 00:32:16,966 political groups, even if the 1020 00:32:16,966 --> 00:32:18,566 elimination is massively 1021 00:32:18,566 --> 00:32:20,266 homicidal, and "ethnicide" for 1022 00:32:20,266 --> 00:32:21,633 cultural genocides that are not 1023 00:32:21,633 --> 00:32:23,633 massively homicidal. 1024 00:32:23,633 --> 00:32:26,033 A commonly cited example of 1025 00:32:26,033 --> 00:32:27,800 "politicide" is Josef Stalin's 1026 00:32:27,800 --> 00:32:30,766 purges of his perceived 1027 00:32:30,766 --> 00:32:32,566 political opponents. 1028 00:32:32,566 --> 00:32:34,033 A commonly cited example of 1029 00:32:34,033 --> 00:32:35,600 cultural genocide is the 1030 00:32:35,600 --> 00:32:37,333 transportation and reeducation 1031 00:32:37,333 --> 00:32:38,966 of children, as was done to 1032 00:32:38,966 --> 00:32:40,333 Native American children in this 1033 00:32:40,333 --> 00:32:42,266 country, and to mixed race 1034 00:32:42,266 --> 00:32:44,333 children in Australia. 1035 00:32:44,333 --> 00:32:45,800 The apparent objective in each 1036 00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:47,766 case was assimilation into a 1037 00:32:47,766 --> 00:32:49,400 cultural group other than their 1038 00:32:49,400 --> 00:32:51,500 culture of origin, and the 1039 00:32:51,500 --> 00:32:53,566 policies included such measures 1040 00:32:53,566 --> 00:32:54,933 as forbidding the children to 1041 00:32:54,933 --> 00:32:56,733 use their native language or 1042 00:32:56,733 --> 00:32:58,333 communicate with their families 1043 00:32:58,333 --> 00:33:00,133 of origin. 1044 00:33:00,133 --> 00:33:01,366 Those who favored including 1045 00:33:01,366 --> 00:33:03,133 "politicides" in the definition 1046 00:33:03,133 --> 00:33:04,866 lost at the 1948 convention 1047 00:33:04,866 --> 00:33:06,733 whereas those who favored 1048 00:33:06,733 --> 00:33:08,800 including forced cultural 1049 00:33:08,800 --> 00:33:11,666 assimilations won their point. 1050 00:33:11,666 --> 00:33:13,133 That inclusion means that, on 1051 00:33:13,133 --> 00:33:14,933 this definition, a genocide need 1052 00:33:14,933 --> 00:33:16,933 not be massively homicidal. 1053 00:33:20,933 --> 00:33:22,366 A philosophically interesting 1054 00:33:22,366 --> 00:33:23,666 question that the convention 1055 00:33:23,666 --> 00:33:25,733 apparently did not consider is 1056 00:33:25,733 --> 00:33:28,333 the Murder, Inc. problem. 1057 00:33:28,333 --> 00:33:30,800 What about evil groups? 1058 00:33:30,800 --> 00:33:32,233 If a group is so evil that its 1059 00:33:32,233 --> 00:33:33,433 destruction appears to be 1060 00:33:33,433 --> 00:33:35,100 justified, why should that 1061 00:33:35,100 --> 00:33:36,633 destruction not count as a 1062 00:33:36,633 --> 00:33:38,133 genocide? 1063 00:33:38,133 --> 00:33:39,400 When the Southern Poverty Law 1064 00:33:39,400 --> 00:33:40,933 Center destroys white 1065 00:33:40,933 --> 00:33:42,300 supremacist groups by 1066 00:33:42,300 --> 00:33:44,666 bankrupting them, why is it not 1067 00:33:44,666 --> 00:33:46,300 committing genocide? 1068 00:33:46,300 --> 00:33:48,133 Why was de-Nazification not a 1069 00:33:48,133 --> 00:33:50,333 genocidal process? 1070 00:33:50,333 --> 00:33:51,900 Dismantling of those groups 1071 00:33:51,900 --> 00:33:54,166 might sound like condition "c" 1072 00:33:54,166 --> 00:33:55,633 of the U.N. definition: 1073 00:33:55,633 --> 00:33:57,233 deliberately imposing conditions 1074 00:33:57,233 --> 00:33:59,133 of life calculated to bring 1075 00:33:59,133 --> 00:34:02,933 about the group's destruction. 1076 00:34:02,933 --> 00:34:05,500 A first response is that these 1077 00:34:05,500 --> 00:34:07,166 ways of destroying evil 1078 00:34:07,166 --> 00:34:08,900 organizations still respected 1079 00:34:08,900 --> 00:34:10,533 the human rights of the members 1080 00:34:10,533 --> 00:34:12,200 of those organizations. 1081 00:34:12,200 --> 00:34:13,600 Genocides do not. 1082 00:34:13,600 --> 00:34:15,500 And that is true. 1083 00:34:15,500 --> 00:34:17,700 A second response might be that, 1084 00:34:17,700 --> 00:34:19,266 aside from the truth or falsity 1085 00:34:19,266 --> 00:34:21,000 of things attributed to members 1086 00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:23,366 of a people, a people cannot be 1087 00:34:23,366 --> 00:34:26,066 evil because a people is not 1088 00:34:26,066 --> 00:34:27,500 the kind of group that can act 1089 00:34:27,500 --> 00:34:29,600 and so cannot be guilty of 1090 00:34:29,600 --> 00:34:31,766 inexcusable wrongs. 1091 00:34:31,766 --> 00:34:33,733 I think that is also true. 1092 00:34:33,733 --> 00:34:35,166 And yet, some targets of 1093 00:34:35,166 --> 00:34:36,633 genocide have been groups that 1094 00:34:36,633 --> 00:34:38,766 can act: the ancient city of 1095 00:34:38,766 --> 00:34:41,100 Carthage, for example, and the 1096 00:34:41,100 --> 00:34:42,500 inhabitants of the island of 1097 00:34:42,500 --> 00:34:44,700 Melos who refused to pay tribute 1098 00:34:44,700 --> 00:34:47,266 to the Athenians. 1099 00:34:47,266 --> 00:34:48,800 Here is another way to think 1100 00:34:48,800 --> 00:34:50,000 about what distinguishes the 1101 00:34:50,000 --> 00:34:51,600 destruction of evil groups from 1102 00:34:51,600 --> 00:34:53,233 genocides. 1103 00:34:53,233 --> 00:34:54,633 It is not just that these groups 1104 00:34:54,633 --> 00:34:55,933 are too small or too thin to 1105 00:34:55,933 --> 00:34:57,366 constitute a people, although 1106 00:34:57,366 --> 00:34:58,866 they are. 1107 00:34:58,866 --> 00:35:00,600 Some peoples are larger and 1108 00:35:00,600 --> 00:35:02,533 richer, more layered, than 1109 00:35:02,533 --> 00:35:03,933 others. 1110 00:35:03,933 --> 00:35:05,333 Sometimes the "tribe" targeted 1111 00:35:05,333 --> 00:35:06,966 by a genocide is better thought 1112 00:35:06,966 --> 00:35:09,133 of simply as a community that 1113 00:35:09,133 --> 00:35:10,900 significantly gives meaning and 1114 00:35:10,900 --> 00:35:13,333 identity to its members. 1115 00:35:13,333 --> 00:35:14,666 We might get an interesting 1116 00:35:14,666 --> 00:35:16,666 answer it we can explain the 1117 00:35:16,666 --> 00:35:18,300 following disanalogy between 1118 00:35:18,300 --> 00:35:20,566 killing an evil person and 1119 00:35:20,566 --> 00:35:23,166 destroying an evil group. 1120 00:35:23,166 --> 00:35:24,866 Killing an evil person is still 1121 00:35:24,866 --> 00:35:27,000 murder, unless it is done in 1122 00:35:27,000 --> 00:35:28,700 self-defense, understood fairly 1123 00:35:28,700 --> 00:35:30,166 narrowly. 1124 00:35:30,166 --> 00:35:32,033 The fact that you are evil is 1125 00:35:32,033 --> 00:35:33,500 not sufficient to justify 1126 00:35:33,500 --> 00:35:35,533 someone in killing you. 1127 00:35:35,533 --> 00:35:37,133 But it can be justifiable to 1128 00:35:37,133 --> 00:35:38,900 destroy an evil group, as the 1129 00:35:38,900 --> 00:35:40,900 Southern Poverty Law Center does 1130 00:35:40,900 --> 00:35:42,333 when it bankrupts white 1131 00:35:42,333 --> 00:35:43,666 supremacist groups with 1132 00:35:43,666 --> 00:35:45,466 lawsuits. 1133 00:35:45,466 --> 00:35:47,300 Why is killing an evil group not 1134 00:35:47,300 --> 00:35:49,233 murder, if killing an evil 1135 00:35:49,233 --> 00:35:51,433 individual is? 1136 00:35:51,433 --> 00:35:53,633 A possible rationale is that the 1137 00:35:53,633 --> 00:35:55,166 principles or projects that a 1138 00:35:55,166 --> 00:35:56,566 person endorses at a particular 1139 00:35:56,566 --> 00:35:58,900 time do not define or determine 1140 00:35:58,900 --> 00:36:01,333 the value of the person. 1141 00:36:01,333 --> 00:36:02,466 The person is someone who has 1142 00:36:02,466 --> 00:36:04,433 the capacity to evaluate such 1143 00:36:04,433 --> 00:36:07,933 things, to adopt or reject them, 1144 00:36:07,933 --> 00:36:09,300 to discover errors, correct 1145 00:36:09,300 --> 00:36:11,100 mistaken judgments and identify 1146 00:36:11,100 --> 00:36:12,766 other mistakes. 1147 00:36:12,766 --> 00:36:14,433 Persons have the capacity to 1148 00:36:14,433 --> 00:36:16,166 correct or improve themselves, 1149 00:36:16,166 --> 00:36:18,200 even when they don't do it. 1150 00:36:18,200 --> 00:36:19,400 With a different set of 1151 00:36:19,400 --> 00:36:21,100 principles and projects, you are 1152 00:36:21,100 --> 00:36:22,566 still the same person, morally 1153 00:36:22,566 --> 00:36:24,433 speaking, who did what you did 1154 00:36:24,433 --> 00:36:25,933 when you espoused a different 1155 00:36:25,933 --> 00:36:28,500 set of principles and projects. 1156 00:36:28,500 --> 00:36:30,533 You may feel like a new person. 1157 00:36:30,533 --> 00:36:31,733 But you are responsible for all 1158 00:36:31,733 --> 00:36:33,900 of it. 1159 00:36:33,900 --> 00:36:35,966 But, for some human groups, for 1160 00:36:35,966 --> 00:36:38,233 example, some evil organizations 1161 00:36:38,233 --> 00:36:39,800 principles and projects really 1162 00:36:39,800 --> 00:36:42,633 do define the organization. 1163 00:36:42,633 --> 00:36:43,900 There is no way to reject those 1164 00:36:43,900 --> 00:36:45,033 defining principles while 1165 00:36:45,033 --> 00:36:47,333 preserving the organization. 1166 00:36:47,333 --> 00:36:48,800 Other human groups, such as 1167 00:36:48,800 --> 00:36:50,300 states that have a constitution 1168 00:36:50,300 --> 00:36:52,233 and organized religions that 1169 00:36:52,233 --> 00:36:54,333 have processes for re-evaluating 1170 00:36:54,333 --> 00:36:56,266 and re-interpreting their 1171 00:36:56,266 --> 00:36:58,766 positions or policies, are, like 1172 00:36:58,766 --> 00:37:00,733 individuals, capable of 1173 00:37:00,733 --> 00:37:02,766 self-correction. 1174 00:37:02,766 --> 00:37:04,833 A people has within itself 1175 00:37:04,833 --> 00:37:06,733 resources for evaluating 1176 00:37:06,733 --> 00:37:08,133 positions taken by some of its 1177 00:37:08,133 --> 00:37:09,466 members, and the value of a 1178 00:37:09,466 --> 00:37:11,333 people, somewhat like the value 1179 00:37:11,333 --> 00:37:13,033 of a person, is not a function 1180 00:37:13,033 --> 00:37:14,900 of particular projects that 1181 00:37:14,900 --> 00:37:17,133 might be found within it. 1182 00:37:17,133 --> 00:37:18,800 But organizations like Murder, 1183 00:37:18,800 --> 00:37:20,733 Inc. have as their 1184 00:37:20,733 --> 00:37:22,400 raisons d'etre the perpetration 1185 00:37:22,400 --> 00:37:24,233 of such deeds as murder for 1186 00:37:24,233 --> 00:37:26,633 hire and extortion. 1187 00:37:26,633 --> 00:37:28,066 There was no way to eliminate 1188 00:37:28,066 --> 00:37:29,366 those policies without the 1189 00:37:29,366 --> 00:37:30,966 organization's ceasing to have 1190 00:37:30,966 --> 00:37:32,933 its reason for existing. 1191 00:37:32,933 --> 00:37:34,100 There is no meaningful 1192 00:37:34,100 --> 00:37:35,833 distinction to be drawn here 1193 00:37:35,833 --> 00:37:37,166 between the principles and 1194 00:37:37,166 --> 00:37:38,900 projects that define the 1195 00:37:38,900 --> 00:37:40,333 organization and the 1196 00:37:40,333 --> 00:37:41,900 organization itself. 1197 00:37:41,900 --> 00:37:43,500 The German state under Third 1198 00:37:43,500 --> 00:37:45,900 Reich had too little capability 1199 00:37:45,900 --> 00:37:47,500 of self-correction. 1200 00:37:47,500 --> 00:37:49,233 People within Germany tried to 1201 00:37:49,233 --> 00:37:51,000 get rid of Hitler. 1202 00:37:51,000 --> 00:37:52,500 There were at least 13 failed 1203 00:37:52,500 --> 00:37:53,900 attempts, according to one 1204 00:37:53,900 --> 00:37:56,766 documentary on this topic. 1205 00:37:56,766 --> 00:37:58,300 But there was no effective 1206 00:37:58,300 --> 00:37:59,733 internal mechanism, such as 1207 00:37:59,733 --> 00:38:03,066 impeachment, for doing so. 1208 00:38:03,066 --> 00:38:04,466 What is destroyed when such a 1209 00:38:04,466 --> 00:38:05,766 group is destroyed are, 1210 00:38:05,766 --> 00:38:07,466 basically, the inhumane projects 1211 00:38:07,466 --> 00:38:09,266 to which it is committed. 1212 00:38:09,266 --> 00:38:11,233 Likewise with Murder, Inc. 1213 00:38:11,233 --> 00:38:12,233 and, I suspect, with the Ku Klux 1214 00:38:12,233 --> 00:38:13,933 Klan. 1215 00:38:13,933 --> 00:38:16,100 If there is any plausibility in 1216 00:38:16,100 --> 00:38:18,166 this kind of explanation, then 1217 00:38:18,166 --> 00:38:19,666 to be a potential target of 1218 00:38:19,666 --> 00:38:21,233 genocide, it would not be enough 1219 00:38:21,233 --> 00:38:23,366 that the relationships defining 1220 00:38:23,366 --> 00:38:25,166 the group in question gave 1221 00:38:25,166 --> 00:38:26,600 meaning, shape, and content to 1222 00:38:26,600 --> 00:38:28,366 the lives of their members. 1223 00:38:28,366 --> 00:38:30,566 They must give a decent sort of 1224 00:38:30,566 --> 00:38:32,866 meaning, shape, and content. 1225 00:38:32,866 --> 00:38:34,533 The group must, at any rate, not 1226 00:38:34,533 --> 00:38:37,233 have as its raison d'etre an 1227 00:38:37,233 --> 00:38:39,100 evil project or set of evil 1228 00:38:39,100 --> 00:38:40,766 projects. 1229 00:38:40,766 --> 00:38:42,433 A people is a kind of group that 1230 00:38:42,433 --> 00:38:44,200 evolves, not something that is 1231 00:38:44,200 --> 00:38:45,533 ordinarily deliberately 1232 00:38:45,533 --> 00:38:46,933 constituted, the way an 1233 00:38:46,933 --> 00:38:48,333 organization is deliberately 1234 00:38:48,333 --> 00:38:49,800 created. 1235 00:38:49,800 --> 00:38:51,333 A people as such is not the kind 1236 00:38:51,333 --> 00:38:52,800 of group that can be said to 1237 00:38:52,800 --> 00:38:54,533 have defining projects, although 1238 00:38:54,533 --> 00:38:56,200 a state might have them. 1239 00:38:56,200 --> 00:38:58,566 But not all peoples have states. 1240 00:38:58,566 --> 00:39:00,233 The Diaspora Jews and the Sinti 1241 00:39:00,233 --> 00:39:01,766 and Roma of Europe during the 1242 00:39:01,766 --> 00:39:03,300 reign of Hitler were peoples 1243 00:39:03,300 --> 00:39:05,766 without states. 1244 00:39:05,766 --> 00:39:07,300 Perhaps the idea that it is not 1245 00:39:07,300 --> 00:39:09,000 necessarily evil to destroy an 1246 00:39:09,000 --> 00:39:11,833 evil group might partly explain 1247 00:39:11,833 --> 00:39:15,333 how some ordinary Germans, not 1248 00:39:15,333 --> 00:39:16,600 Nazis or members of the 1249 00:39:16,600 --> 00:39:18,600 government or military, could be 1250 00:39:18,600 --> 00:39:20,633 as complicit as so many were in 1251 00:39:20,633 --> 00:39:23,633 Hitler's Final Solution. 1252 00:39:23,633 --> 00:39:25,366 Nazi propaganda portrayed the 1253 00:39:25,366 --> 00:39:27,933 Jews as an evil people, and 1254 00:39:27,933 --> 00:39:29,866 paranoid propaganda portrayed 1255 00:39:29,866 --> 00:39:31,500 that people as embarked on a 1256 00:39:31,500 --> 00:39:33,866 project of world domination. 1257 00:39:33,866 --> 00:39:35,266 I don't think the idea of an 1258 00:39:35,266 --> 00:39:37,333 evil people makes sense; it 1259 00:39:37,333 --> 00:39:38,666 presupposes that a people can be 1260 00:39:38,666 --> 00:39:40,133 an agent. 1261 00:39:40,133 --> 00:39:41,333 But a people does not have 1262 00:39:41,333 --> 00:39:42,833 enough internal cohesion for 1263 00:39:42,833 --> 00:39:44,366 that to be the case. 1264 00:39:44,366 --> 00:39:46,233 That point aside, Nazi 1265 00:39:46,233 --> 00:39:48,200 propaganda portraying the Jews 1266 00:39:48,200 --> 00:39:50,133 as an evil people could at best 1267 00:39:50,133 --> 00:39:52,366 only partly explain the 1268 00:39:52,366 --> 00:39:54,766 complicity of ordinary Germans. 1269 00:39:54,766 --> 00:39:56,300 For it matters when a group is 1270 00:39:56,300 --> 00:39:58,633 destroyed how that is done. 1271 00:39:58,633 --> 00:40:00,566 Individual members of even an 1272 00:40:00,566 --> 00:40:02,033 evil group would still have 1273 00:40:02,033 --> 00:40:03,766 human rights. 1274 00:40:03,766 --> 00:40:05,433 The Southern Poverty Law Center 1275 00:40:05,433 --> 00:40:06,600 does not kill white 1276 00:40:06,600 --> 00:40:07,733 supremacists. 1277 00:40:07,733 --> 00:40:08,833 It bankrupts their 1278 00:40:08,833 --> 00:40:10,000 organizations. 1279 00:40:10,000 --> 00:40:12,266 And so, even the misguided and 1280 00:40:12,266 --> 00:40:13,800 confused belief by ordinary 1281 00:40:13,800 --> 00:40:15,300 Germans that the Jews were an 1282 00:40:15,300 --> 00:40:17,500 evil people would not explain 1283 00:40:17,500 --> 00:40:20,000 their complicity in the killing 1284 00:40:20,000 --> 00:40:22,566 of individual Jews. 1285 00:40:22,566 --> 00:40:24,433 I want to move on now from the 1286 00:40:24,433 --> 00:40:25,566 non-arbitrariness of 1287 00:40:25,566 --> 00:40:27,000 understanding genocide as a kind 1288 00:40:27,000 --> 00:40:30,400 of murder, which I don't think 1289 00:40:30,400 --> 00:40:31,700 it is arbitrary, to consider 1290 00:40:31,700 --> 00:40:33,433 some other groups that are not 1291 00:40:33,433 --> 00:40:34,633 mentioned in the U.N. 1292 00:40:34,633 --> 00:40:35,800 definition. 1293 00:40:35,800 --> 00:40:36,833 What about the idea of a gay 1294 00:40:36,833 --> 00:40:38,233 genocide? 1295 00:40:38,233 --> 00:40:42,066 Would that idea make sense? 1296 00:40:42,066 --> 00:40:43,833 Gays are not a people or any 1297 00:40:43,833 --> 00:40:45,800 kind of tribe. 1298 00:40:45,800 --> 00:40:47,033 If the question is about all the 1299 00:40:47,033 --> 00:40:48,333 gays in the world, they do not 1300 00:40:48,333 --> 00:40:50,433 form a community and never have, 1301 00:40:50,433 --> 00:40:51,700 although there have been many 1302 00:40:51,700 --> 00:40:53,066 gay communities. 1303 00:40:53,066 --> 00:40:54,400 Men who were identified as 1304 00:40:54,400 --> 00:40:56,066 homosexuals and forced to wear 1305 00:40:56,066 --> 00:40:57,500 the "pink triangle" in Nazi 1306 00:40:57,500 --> 00:40:59,766 camps suffered losses of social 1307 00:40:59,766 --> 00:41:01,766 vitality specific to their being 1308 00:41:01,766 --> 00:41:03,866 gay if they had been members of 1309 00:41:03,866 --> 00:41:05,866 gay communities. 1310 00:41:05,866 --> 00:41:07,333 Gay communities can shape and 1311 00:41:07,333 --> 00:41:09,000 animate the lives of their 1312 00:41:09,000 --> 00:41:11,266 members in positive ways which 1313 00:41:11,266 --> 00:41:12,666 is especially important in the 1314 00:41:12,666 --> 00:41:14,500 context of a larger social world 1315 00:41:14,500 --> 00:41:16,400 that rejects them. 1316 00:41:16,400 --> 00:41:18,766 Does the forcibly imposed loss 1317 00:41:18,766 --> 00:41:20,966 of such social vitality 1318 00:41:20,966 --> 00:41:22,933 constitute a gay genocide? 1319 00:41:22,933 --> 00:41:25,000 The philosopher James Nickel, in 1320 00:41:25,000 --> 00:41:26,800 an interesting essay on four 1321 00:41:26,800 --> 00:41:29,100 ways of getting rid of groups, 1322 00:41:29,100 --> 00:41:31,033 mentions the case of forcibly 1323 00:41:31,033 --> 00:41:33,100 re-educating homosexuals as 1324 00:41:33,100 --> 00:41:34,466 analogous to the forced 1325 00:41:34,466 --> 00:41:37,133 assimilation of cultural groups, 1326 00:41:37,133 --> 00:41:38,866 which he regards as not 1327 00:41:38,866 --> 00:41:40,766 ordinarily genocidal. 1328 00:41:40,766 --> 00:41:42,033 But the men of the pink 1329 00:41:42,033 --> 00:41:43,500 triangles were persecuted and 1330 00:41:43,500 --> 00:41:46,033 ostracized, not re-educated. 1331 00:41:46,033 --> 00:41:47,400 They resemble victims of a 1332 00:41:47,400 --> 00:41:49,200 genocide to the extent that 1333 00:41:49,200 --> 00:41:50,766 their lives had importantly 1334 00:41:50,766 --> 00:41:52,700 gained positive meaning from gay 1335 00:41:52,700 --> 00:41:54,033 communities to which they 1336 00:41:54,033 --> 00:41:56,233 belonged, which were destroyed. 1337 00:41:56,233 --> 00:41:57,800 Yet those communities were far 1338 00:41:57,800 --> 00:42:01,300 younger, transitory, in flux and 1339 00:42:01,300 --> 00:42:03,833 inevitably less richly textured 1340 00:42:03,833 --> 00:42:06,933 and layered than communities 1341 00:42:06,933 --> 00:42:08,633 constituted by sharers of a 1342 00:42:08,633 --> 00:42:10,766 natural language, religion, and 1343 00:42:10,766 --> 00:42:13,366 multi-generational traditions. 1344 00:42:13,366 --> 00:42:14,833 Gay communities are like many 1345 00:42:14,833 --> 00:42:16,566 political communities, and many 1346 00:42:16,566 --> 00:42:18,100 are political communities, 1347 00:42:18,100 --> 00:42:19,700 pockets of resistance to 1348 00:42:19,700 --> 00:42:21,500 prevailing norms. 1349 00:42:21,500 --> 00:42:23,066 Still, those communities were 1350 00:42:23,066 --> 00:42:25,000 only part of what gave shape and 1351 00:42:25,000 --> 00:42:26,366 meanings to the lives of their 1352 00:42:26,366 --> 00:42:27,866 members. 1353 00:42:27,866 --> 00:42:29,166 The members of gay communities 1354 00:42:29,166 --> 00:42:31,066 also had many other communities 1355 00:42:31,066 --> 00:42:32,633 of origin. 1356 00:42:32,633 --> 00:42:34,033 Gay communities can have a 1357 00:42:34,033 --> 00:42:36,100 life-saving impact on those who 1358 00:42:36,100 --> 00:42:38,366 are otherwise cultural rejects. 1359 00:42:38,366 --> 00:42:41,066 But many then as now did not 1360 00:42:41,066 --> 00:42:43,133 belong to gay communities. 1361 00:42:43,133 --> 00:42:44,966 Many have been, and are today, 1362 00:42:44,966 --> 00:42:46,433 married to someone of another 1363 00:42:46,433 --> 00:42:50,400 sex. 1364 00:42:50,400 --> 00:42:51,833 The men most likely to be 1365 00:42:51,833 --> 00:42:53,066 rounded up and sent to 1366 00:42:53,066 --> 00:42:54,366 concentration camps were those 1367 00:42:54,366 --> 00:42:55,633 who met at gay bars or gay 1368 00:42:55,633 --> 00:42:57,633 parties or were activists. 1369 00:42:57,633 --> 00:42:58,933 The philosopher Ludwig 1370 00:42:58,933 --> 00:43:00,633 Wittgenstein's idea of family 1371 00:43:00,633 --> 00:43:03,500 resemblance concepts is useful 1372 00:43:03,500 --> 00:43:05,133 for thinking about the extent to 1373 00:43:05,133 --> 00:43:07,000 which the idea of a gay genocide 1374 00:43:07,000 --> 00:43:08,966 makes sense. 1375 00:43:08,966 --> 00:43:11,066 Destruction of gay communities 1376 00:43:11,066 --> 00:43:12,733 is hardly a paradigm of 1377 00:43:12,733 --> 00:43:13,833 genocide. 1378 00:43:13,833 --> 00:43:15,166 But it does bear some relevant 1379 00:43:15,166 --> 00:43:17,100 similarities and so, when the 1380 00:43:17,100 --> 00:43:18,833 assault is systematic, it might 1381 00:43:18,833 --> 00:43:20,466 find a place in the extended 1382 00:43:20,466 --> 00:43:23,566 family of genocidal assaults. 1383 00:43:23,566 --> 00:43:24,833 The way to think about it, on 1384 00:43:24,833 --> 00:43:27,066 the social death hypothesis, is 1385 00:43:27,066 --> 00:43:29,033 to consider to what extent the 1386 00:43:29,033 --> 00:43:31,300 destroyed community had 1387 00:43:31,300 --> 00:43:33,233 contributed meaning and identity 1388 00:43:33,233 --> 00:43:35,066 to its members and whether the 1389 00:43:35,066 --> 00:43:36,666 loss of those meanings would 1390 00:43:36,666 --> 00:43:38,333 leave those individuals socially 1391 00:43:38,333 --> 00:43:41,166 dead. 1392 00:43:41,166 --> 00:43:42,566 The idea of a genocide of the 1393 00:43:42,566 --> 00:43:44,866 disabled stretches the concept 1394 00:43:44,866 --> 00:43:46,866 of genocide even further. 1395 00:43:46,866 --> 00:43:48,700 And yet, there are communities 1396 00:43:48,700 --> 00:43:50,033 built around the needs and 1397 00:43:50,033 --> 00:43:51,566 interests of persons with 1398 00:43:51,566 --> 00:43:54,166 specific kinds of disabilities, 1399 00:43:54,166 --> 00:43:55,900 and it is not impossible that 1400 00:43:55,900 --> 00:43:56,966 they might be targeted for 1401 00:43:56,966 --> 00:43:58,833 elimination. 1402 00:43:58,833 --> 00:44:00,400 Hitler's euthanasia program 1403 00:44:00,400 --> 00:44:01,966 targeted individuals with 1404 00:44:01,966 --> 00:44:04,033 disabilities, not communities. 1405 00:44:04,033 --> 00:44:05,500 But were a tyrant with similar 1406 00:44:05,500 --> 00:44:07,000 ambitions to come to power 1407 00:44:07,000 --> 00:44:08,333 today, such communities might be 1408 00:44:08,333 --> 00:44:10,566 targeted. 1409 00:44:10,566 --> 00:44:12,633 But what some feminist scholars 1410 00:44:12,633 --> 00:44:15,533 call "femicide," the systematic 1411 00:44:15,533 --> 00:44:17,366 murder of females, for example, 1412 00:44:17,366 --> 00:44:19,700 by exposing infants, is not a 1413 00:44:19,700 --> 00:44:21,700 form of genocide. 1414 00:44:21,700 --> 00:44:23,833 Females are a class, a category, 1415 00:44:23,833 --> 00:44:26,233 but not a community. 1416 00:44:26,233 --> 00:44:27,733 Classes or categories are not 1417 00:44:27,733 --> 00:44:29,600 the right sorts of groups to be 1418 00:44:29,600 --> 00:44:31,833 targets of genocide. 1419 00:44:31,833 --> 00:44:33,400 The class of all the individuals 1420 00:44:33,400 --> 00:44:34,800 who were in the Twin Towers on 1421 00:44:34,800 --> 00:44:37,133 9/11 does not define a group 1422 00:44:37,133 --> 00:44:38,700 that it would make any sense to 1423 00:44:38,700 --> 00:44:41,766 regard as a target of genocide. 1424 00:44:41,766 --> 00:44:43,600 When Marc Lépine entered a 1425 00:44:43,600 --> 00:44:46,766 classroom in Montreal in 1989, 1426 00:44:46,766 --> 00:44:48,066 announced that he was "fighting 1427 00:44:48,066 --> 00:44:49,666 feminism," separated the men 1428 00:44:49,666 --> 00:44:51,566 from the women, shot nine women, 1429 00:44:51,566 --> 00:44:53,366 killing six, and then roamed the 1430 00:44:53,366 --> 00:44:55,633 hallways shooting more women, 1431 00:44:55,633 --> 00:44:57,933 14 all told, he became a mass 1432 00:44:57,933 --> 00:44:59,966 murderer but not a perpetrator 1433 00:44:59,966 --> 00:45:01,733 of genocide. 1434 00:45:01,733 --> 00:45:03,400 Feminist scholars rightly call 1435 00:45:03,400 --> 00:45:04,866 this a femicide. 1436 00:45:04,866 --> 00:45:07,166 But femicide is not an instance 1437 00:45:07,166 --> 00:45:09,466 of genocide. 1438 00:45:09,466 --> 00:45:12,500 Last month a cadet at the U.S. 1439 00:45:12,500 --> 00:45:14,200 Air Force Academy in Colorado 1440 00:45:14,200 --> 00:45:15,666 Springs posed the following 1441 00:45:15,666 --> 00:45:18,000 question to me after I gave a 1442 00:45:18,000 --> 00:45:19,900 version of this talk. 1443 00:45:19,900 --> 00:45:21,666 Was Hitler's destruction of the 1444 00:45:21,666 --> 00:45:24,366 Czech city of Lidice in response 1445 00:45:24,366 --> 00:45:26,000 to the assassination of 1446 00:45:26,000 --> 00:45:30,800 Reinhard Heydrich, a genocide? 1447 00:45:30,800 --> 00:45:32,033 Was Hitler's destruction of the 1448 00:45:32,033 --> 00:45:34,400 city of Lidice a genocide? 1449 00:45:34,400 --> 00:45:35,566 I thought that was an astute 1450 00:45:35,566 --> 00:45:37,066 question. 1451 00:45:37,066 --> 00:45:38,866 If the city of Carthage was a 1452 00:45:38,866 --> 00:45:41,366 victim of genocide, why not the 1453 00:45:41,366 --> 00:45:43,833 city of Lidice? 1454 00:45:43,833 --> 00:45:45,466 Again, I would say the way to 1455 00:45:45,466 --> 00:45:47,466 think about it is to consider to 1456 00:45:47,466 --> 00:45:49,900 what extent that city defined 1457 00:45:49,900 --> 00:45:51,933 the social vitality of its 1458 00:45:51,933 --> 00:45:53,500 members. 1459 00:45:53,500 --> 00:45:55,100 The city of Lidice was part of 1460 00:45:55,100 --> 00:45:57,633 the larger Czech state that was 1461 00:45:57,633 --> 00:45:59,766 surely also a contributor to the 1462 00:45:59,766 --> 00:46:01,200 social vitality of the 1463 00:46:01,200 --> 00:46:03,100 inhabitants of its cities, which 1464 00:46:03,100 --> 00:46:05,366 makes the case more complicated 1465 00:46:05,366 --> 00:46:07,466 than that of Carthage. 1466 00:46:07,466 --> 00:46:09,100 There is more to be said, but I 1467 00:46:09,100 --> 00:46:11,433 want now to leave the worry that 1468 00:46:11,433 --> 00:46:12,933 the U.N. definition may be too 1469 00:46:12,933 --> 00:46:15,000 narrow and turn to the worry 1470 00:46:15,000 --> 00:46:16,733 that it may be too wide, because 1471 00:46:16,733 --> 00:46:18,533 of the phrase "in whole or in 1472 00:46:18,533 --> 00:46:20,300 part." 1473 00:46:20,300 --> 00:46:22,233 On the commonest interpretation 1474 00:46:22,233 --> 00:46:23,933 of "in whole or in part," 1475 00:46:23,933 --> 00:46:25,300 that phrase invites the 1476 00:46:25,300 --> 00:46:26,800 question, how big does the part 1477 00:46:26,800 --> 00:46:28,566 have to be? 1478 00:46:28,566 --> 00:46:30,500 For example, how many need be 1479 00:46:30,500 --> 00:46:31,566 killed? 1480 00:46:31,566 --> 00:46:33,266 One person is a part of a group. 1481 00:46:33,266 --> 00:46:35,500 Yet the murder of one person is 1482 00:46:35,500 --> 00:46:37,533 not a genocide, though it can be 1483 00:46:37,533 --> 00:46:39,333 a hate crime. 1484 00:46:39,333 --> 00:46:41,133 And what if there are survivors? 1485 00:46:41,133 --> 00:46:42,733 Has a people really been killed 1486 00:46:42,733 --> 00:46:44,166 if there are survivors? 1487 00:46:44,166 --> 00:46:45,500 And by the way, there are almost 1488 00:46:45,500 --> 00:46:47,700 always some survivors. 1489 00:46:47,700 --> 00:46:49,333 How severe must the harm be? 1490 00:46:49,333 --> 00:46:51,033 Must it be irreversible? 1491 00:46:51,033 --> 00:46:52,266 how many need be harmed? 1492 00:46:52,266 --> 00:46:53,333 How many children need be 1493 00:46:53,333 --> 00:46:54,200 transferred? 1494 00:46:54,200 --> 00:46:55,833 Must they be permanently lost to 1495 00:46:55,833 --> 00:46:57,433 their communities of origin? 1496 00:46:57,433 --> 00:46:58,733 How much physical destruction 1497 00:46:58,733 --> 00:46:59,966 must there be? 1498 00:46:59,966 --> 00:47:01,366 How much birth prevention, and 1499 00:47:01,366 --> 00:47:03,000 so on? 1500 00:47:03,000 --> 00:47:04,600 The U.N. definition invites 1501 00:47:04,600 --> 00:47:06,333 these sorts of questions. 1502 00:47:06,333 --> 00:47:08,033 One of the provisos with which 1503 00:47:08,033 --> 00:47:09,200 the United States eventually 1504 00:47:09,200 --> 00:47:11,466 accepted the genocide convention 1505 00:47:11,466 --> 00:47:12,900 was that the "part" had 1506 00:47:12,900 --> 00:47:15,433 to be "a substantial part." 1507 00:47:15,433 --> 00:47:16,766 It seems there is no 1508 00:47:16,766 --> 00:47:18,433 non-arbitrary way to draw a line 1509 00:47:18,433 --> 00:47:20,733 between genocides and less 1510 00:47:20,733 --> 00:47:23,766 massive atrocities. 1511 00:47:23,766 --> 00:47:26,166 In contrast to the U.N. 1512 00:47:26,166 --> 00:47:27,966 definition, Raphael Lemkin's 1513 00:47:27,966 --> 00:47:29,733 approach, which fits well with 1514 00:47:29,733 --> 00:47:31,933 my social death hypothesis, does 1515 00:47:31,933 --> 00:47:34,200 not so naturally invite 1516 00:47:34,200 --> 00:47:36,133 questions of "how many?" 1517 00:47:36,133 --> 00:47:38,366 On his view, genocides victimize 1518 00:47:38,366 --> 00:47:40,400 members of a group generally. 1519 00:47:40,400 --> 00:47:42,133 Instead of interpreting "in 1520 00:47:42,133 --> 00:47:44,366 whole or in part" as a matter of 1521 00:47:44,366 --> 00:47:46,000 how many individuals were killed 1522 00:47:46,000 --> 00:47:47,933 or harmed, Lemkin looks at the 1523 00:47:47,933 --> 00:47:49,600 kinds of relationships and the 1524 00:47:49,600 --> 00:47:51,500 kinds of social institutions 1525 00:47:51,500 --> 00:47:54,166 that define a group as a people. 1526 00:47:54,166 --> 00:47:55,400 For example, its educational 1527 00:47:55,400 --> 00:47:57,066 institutions, it child-rearing 1528 00:47:57,066 --> 00:47:58,866 practices, its language, its 1529 00:47:58,866 --> 00:48:00,400 economic practices, its 1530 00:48:00,400 --> 00:48:02,000 political practices, its 1531 00:48:02,000 --> 00:48:04,500 religion or religions. 1532 00:48:04,500 --> 00:48:06,233 These are what he regards as the 1533 00:48:06,233 --> 00:48:08,300 group's essential foundations. 1534 00:48:08,300 --> 00:48:10,033 He defines genocide as "a 1535 00:48:10,033 --> 00:48:12,233 coordinated plan of different 1536 00:48:12,233 --> 00:48:13,933 actions aiming at the 1537 00:48:13,933 --> 00:48:15,633 destruction of these essential 1538 00:48:15,633 --> 00:48:17,900 foundations of the life of 1539 00:48:17,900 --> 00:48:19,833 national groups, with the aim of 1540 00:48:19,833 --> 00:48:21,166 annihilating the groups 1541 00:48:21,166 --> 00:48:22,600 themselves" 1542 00:48:22,600 --> 00:48:23,666 The aim of annihilating the 1543 00:48:23,666 --> 00:48:25,233 group is attached, in Lemkin's 1544 00:48:25,233 --> 00:48:26,933 definition, to the overall plan 1545 00:48:26,933 --> 00:48:28,566 that aims to destroy foundations 1546 00:48:28,566 --> 00:48:31,466 of the life of the group. 1547 00:48:31,466 --> 00:48:33,200 The U.N. definition, in 1548 00:48:33,200 --> 00:48:34,833 contrast, attaches the aim of 1549 00:48:34,833 --> 00:48:36,266 destroying the group to the 1550 00:48:36,266 --> 00:48:38,500 enumerated kinds of actions, 1551 00:48:38,500 --> 00:48:40,500 thereby inviting the question 1552 00:48:40,500 --> 00:48:42,300 how many such actions need be 1553 00:48:42,300 --> 00:48:44,133 performed? 1554 00:48:44,133 --> 00:48:47,066 How many people need be killed, 1555 00:48:47,066 --> 00:48:48,566 in order for that action to be 1556 00:48:48,566 --> 00:48:50,100 constitutive of a genocide? 1557 00:48:50,100 --> 00:48:52,033 On Lemkin's view, the group is 1558 00:48:52,033 --> 00:48:53,366 destroyed by destroying the 1559 00:48:53,366 --> 00:48:55,300 relationships, contemporary and 1560 00:48:55,300 --> 00:48:57,933 intergenerational, personal and 1561 00:48:57,933 --> 00:49:00,166 institutional, that are created 1562 00:49:00,166 --> 00:49:02,833 by these social institutions 1563 00:49:02,833 --> 00:49:04,466 fundamental to defining its 1564 00:49:04,466 --> 00:49:06,266 members as a people. 1565 00:49:06,266 --> 00:49:07,733 This destruction can, and 1566 00:49:07,733 --> 00:49:08,933 typically does, take place in 1567 00:49:08,933 --> 00:49:11,900 stages, over time, as social 1568 00:49:11,900 --> 00:49:13,466 restrictions and prohibitions 1569 00:49:13,466 --> 00:49:15,000 are imposed. 1570 00:49:15,000 --> 00:49:16,933 It's not as though religious, 1571 00:49:16,933 --> 00:49:18,500 ethnical, and national groups 1572 00:49:18,500 --> 00:49:19,766 are different kinds of targets 1573 00:49:19,766 --> 00:49:21,300 of genocide. 1574 00:49:21,300 --> 00:49:24,400 Rather, religious, ethnic, and 1575 00:49:24,400 --> 00:49:26,000 political institutions are all 1576 00:49:26,000 --> 00:49:27,733 part of what bind individuals 1577 00:49:27,733 --> 00:49:29,533 together into a people, and it 1578 00:49:29,533 --> 00:49:30,600 is the people that is the 1579 00:49:30,600 --> 00:49:32,133 target. 1580 00:49:32,133 --> 00:49:33,966 Like the U.N. definition, 1581 00:49:33,966 --> 00:49:35,433 Lemkin's understanding also 1582 00:49:35,433 --> 00:49:36,800 allows for genocide to be a 1583 00:49:36,800 --> 00:49:38,466 matter of degree. 1584 00:49:38,466 --> 00:49:40,233 But on Lemkin's approach, 1585 00:49:40,233 --> 00:49:42,200 degrees are the kinds and ranges 1586 00:49:42,200 --> 00:49:44,433 of social vitality destroyed, 1587 00:49:44,433 --> 00:49:46,300 which tends to affect 1588 00:49:46,300 --> 00:49:47,533 individuals in the group 1589 00:49:47,533 --> 00:49:48,866 generally, not just a part of 1590 00:49:48,866 --> 00:49:50,333 them, even if not all are 1591 00:49:50,333 --> 00:49:52,266 affected in the same way or to 1592 00:49:52,266 --> 00:49:54,000 the same degree. 1593 00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:55,300 Here is an illustration of the 1594 00:49:55,300 --> 00:49:56,700 difference between the U.N. 1595 00:49:56,700 --> 00:49:57,966 approach and the Lemkin 1596 00:49:57,966 --> 00:49:59,200 approach. 1597 00:49:59,200 --> 00:50:01,000 Take the case of Rwanda. 1598 00:50:01,000 --> 00:50:03,000 After the Rwandan genocide, 1599 00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:04,266 President Clinton said he did 1600 00:50:04,266 --> 00:50:05,666 not realize how many were being 1601 00:50:05,666 --> 00:50:07,266 killed, as though that were key 1602 00:50:07,266 --> 00:50:09,866 to defining genocide. 1603 00:50:09,866 --> 00:50:11,100 He was thinking in terms of the 1604 00:50:11,100 --> 00:50:13,233 U.N. definition. 1605 00:50:13,233 --> 00:50:14,466 But on Lemkin's approach, we 1606 00:50:14,466 --> 00:50:16,133 would look for destruction of 1607 00:50:16,133 --> 00:50:18,133 social vitality in terms of 1608 00:50:18,133 --> 00:50:19,833 practices, institutions, and 1609 00:50:19,833 --> 00:50:21,900 relationships. 1610 00:50:21,900 --> 00:50:23,833 Given what is commonly known and 1611 00:50:23,833 --> 00:50:25,333 not known in the United States 1612 00:50:25,333 --> 00:50:27,266 about the Rwandan genocide, 1613 00:50:27,266 --> 00:50:28,866 it might appear, initially, to 1614 00:50:28,866 --> 00:50:30,033 us as though Rwanda were a 1615 00:50:30,033 --> 00:50:31,633 counter-example to my social 1616 00:50:31,633 --> 00:50:33,300 death hypothesis. 1617 00:50:33,300 --> 00:50:35,200 What seems most salient in the 1618 00:50:35,200 --> 00:50:37,333 case of Rwanda is the rapid mass 1619 00:50:37,333 --> 00:50:39,366 slaughter by machete. 1620 00:50:39,366 --> 00:50:42,000 Where is the social death? 1621 00:50:42,000 --> 00:50:43,400 But, in fact, the mass 1622 00:50:43,400 --> 00:50:44,733 slaughters were preceded by a 1623 00:50:44,733 --> 00:50:46,600 series of social restrictions 1624 00:50:46,600 --> 00:50:48,266 and prohibitions that actually 1625 00:50:48,266 --> 00:50:50,133 did destroy the social vitality 1626 00:50:50,133 --> 00:50:52,266 of those perceived as Tutsis, 1627 00:50:52,266 --> 00:50:54,200 making it much easier for Hutus 1628 00:50:54,200 --> 00:50:55,866 to kill them. 1629 00:50:55,866 --> 00:50:57,666 Samantha Powers writes in her 1630 00:50:57,666 --> 00:51:00,200 historical survey which she 1631 00:51:00,200 --> 00:51:02,533 titled A Problem from Hell, that 1632 00:51:02,533 --> 00:51:04,566 the Hutu newspaper Kangura 1633 00:51:04,566 --> 00:51:06,533 published in December 1990 a 1634 00:51:06,533 --> 00:51:08,566 list of "Ten Commandments of the 1635 00:51:08,566 --> 00:51:10,666 Hutu," governing relations 1636 00:51:10,666 --> 00:51:12,566 between Hutu and Tutsi. 1637 00:51:12,566 --> 00:51:15,033 They included such statements as 1638 00:51:15,033 --> 00:51:17,666 that any Hutu who marries, 1639 00:51:17,666 --> 00:51:19,100 befriends, or employs as a 1640 00:51:19,100 --> 00:51:20,666 secretary or concubine a Tutsi 1641 00:51:20,666 --> 00:51:22,500 woman shall be considered a 1642 00:51:22,500 --> 00:51:24,366 traitor, and likewise for any 1643 00:51:24,366 --> 00:51:25,766 Hutu who makes a business 1644 00:51:25,766 --> 00:51:27,833 partnership with a Tutsi, 1645 00:51:27,833 --> 00:51:30,033 invests money in a Tutsi 1646 00:51:30,033 --> 00:51:31,633 enterprise, or lends to or 1647 00:51:31,633 --> 00:51:33,933 borrows money from a Tutsi, and 1648 00:51:33,933 --> 00:51:35,900 the list goes on. 1649 00:51:35,900 --> 00:51:37,400 Similarly, she writes, in the 1650 00:51:37,400 --> 00:51:39,966 town of Celinas in northern 1651 00:51:39,966 --> 00:51:41,266 Bosnia non-Serbs were given 1652 00:51:41,266 --> 00:51:43,066 "special status" prior to 1653 00:51:43,066 --> 00:51:44,333 expelling them or concentrating 1654 00:51:44,333 --> 00:51:46,500 them in camps. 1655 00:51:46,500 --> 00:51:48,733 A curfew was imposed from 4 PM 1656 00:51:48,733 --> 00:51:50,733 to 6 AM. 1657 00:51:50,733 --> 00:51:52,666 Non-Serbs were prohibited from 1658 00:51:52,666 --> 00:51:54,333 meeting in cafes, restaurants, 1659 00:51:54,333 --> 00:51:56,700 or other public places, bathing 1660 00:51:56,700 --> 00:51:58,400 or swimming in the nearby 1661 00:51:58,400 --> 00:52:00,566 rivers, hunting or fishing, 1662 00:52:00,566 --> 00:52:01,900 moving to another town without 1663 00:52:01,900 --> 00:52:04,333 permission, carrying a weapon, 1664 00:52:04,333 --> 00:52:06,300 driving or traveling by car, 1665 00:52:06,300 --> 00:52:08,566 and that list goes on as well. 1666 00:52:08,566 --> 00:52:09,700 The restrictions were less 1667 00:52:09,700 --> 00:52:11,533 dramatic and less visible to 1668 00:52:11,533 --> 00:52:13,566 outsiders than were the mass 1669 00:52:13,566 --> 00:52:15,700 slaughters that followed. 1670 00:52:15,700 --> 00:52:17,333 But what is most dramatic and 1671 00:52:17,333 --> 00:52:19,233 most visible is not necessarily 1672 00:52:19,233 --> 00:52:21,266 what is central to the evil of 1673 00:52:21,266 --> 00:52:23,300 destroying a people. 1674 00:52:23,300 --> 00:52:24,566 A similar point can be made 1675 00:52:24,566 --> 00:52:25,966 regarding terrorism. 1676 00:52:25,966 --> 00:52:27,400 What is dramatic and most 1677 00:52:27,400 --> 00:52:29,300 visible is usually a spectacle, 1678 00:52:29,300 --> 00:52:31,600 such as a bombing; but what is 1679 00:52:31,600 --> 00:52:33,566 central to terrorism is a 1680 00:52:33,566 --> 00:52:35,666 pattern, a systematic program of 1681 00:52:35,666 --> 00:52:38,266 credible threats. 1682 00:52:38,266 --> 00:52:39,766 Lemkin also understands a 1683 00:52:39,766 --> 00:52:42,000 genocide as having two phases: 1684 00:52:42,000 --> 00:52:43,633 the first phase consists in the 1685 00:52:43,633 --> 00:52:45,266 destruction of a people, and the 1686 00:52:45,266 --> 00:52:47,300 second phase consists in the 1687 00:52:47,300 --> 00:52:49,100 imposition of a new people on 1688 00:52:49,100 --> 00:52:51,200 the land or individuals 1689 00:52:51,200 --> 00:52:53,966 remaining after the first phase. 1690 00:52:53,966 --> 00:52:55,266 Destruction of a people does not 1691 00:52:55,266 --> 00:52:57,766 always require mass slaughter. 1692 00:52:57,766 --> 00:52:59,366 Hitler reserved that measure 1693 00:52:59,366 --> 00:53:01,433 only for those whom he 1694 00:53:01,433 --> 00:53:03,433 considered un-Germanizable. 1695 00:53:07,433 --> 00:53:09,166 In conclusion, let's return to 1696 00:53:09,166 --> 00:53:11,533 the some of opening questions. 1697 00:53:11,533 --> 00:53:13,133 Some of them have already been 1698 00:53:13,133 --> 00:53:14,833 addressed at some length. 1699 00:53:14,833 --> 00:53:17,000 Take that first one. 1700 00:53:17,000 --> 00:53:18,833 How do genocides differ from 1701 00:53:18,833 --> 00:53:21,833 non-genocidal mass murders? 1702 00:53:21,833 --> 00:53:23,066 The idea of social death is 1703 00:53:23,066 --> 00:53:24,200 helpful. 1704 00:53:24,200 --> 00:53:26,666 First, the victim of genocide is 1705 00:53:26,666 --> 00:53:28,266 a people or a substantial 1706 00:53:28,266 --> 00:53:30,600 community, and the aim, or 1707 00:53:30,600 --> 00:53:32,533 foreseeable consequence, is to 1708 00:53:32,533 --> 00:53:34,533 destroy the social vitality made 1709 00:53:34,533 --> 00:53:36,700 possible by social institutions 1710 00:53:36,700 --> 00:53:38,233 and connections that make of its 1711 00:53:38,233 --> 00:53:40,633 members a people or community. 1712 00:53:40,633 --> 00:53:42,666 Mass murders can victimize 1713 00:53:42,666 --> 00:53:44,533 aggregates of individuals, or 1714 00:53:44,533 --> 00:53:46,700 categories or classes, who do 1715 00:53:46,700 --> 00:53:48,066 not constitute a people or 1716 00:53:48,066 --> 00:53:49,600 community. 1717 00:53:49,600 --> 00:53:52,166 Second, genocide need not be 1718 00:53:52,166 --> 00:53:54,233 massively homicidal on either 1719 00:53:54,233 --> 00:53:55,700 the U.N. definition or 1720 00:53:55,700 --> 00:53:58,166 Lemkin's definition. 1721 00:53:58,166 --> 00:53:59,966 Some genocide scholars think it 1722 00:53:59,966 --> 00:54:01,366 stretches the concept of 1723 00:54:01,366 --> 00:54:03,533 genocide too much if mass murder 1724 00:54:03,533 --> 00:54:05,866 is not considered essential, 1725 00:54:05,866 --> 00:54:07,500 with the result that genocide no 1726 00:54:07,500 --> 00:54:10,566 longer seems as serious a crime. 1727 00:54:10,566 --> 00:54:12,600 My view is, first, that it is 1728 00:54:12,600 --> 00:54:14,500 not obvious that social death is 1729 00:54:14,500 --> 00:54:15,900 less serious than physical 1730 00:54:15,900 --> 00:54:18,600 death. 1731 00:54:18,600 --> 00:54:19,666 And second, that not all 1732 00:54:19,666 --> 00:54:21,200 genocides are equal. 1733 00:54:21,200 --> 00:54:22,833 Some are much worse than others. 1734 00:54:22,833 --> 00:54:24,233 Much depends on how the death is 1735 00:54:24,233 --> 00:54:25,566 brought about. 1736 00:54:25,566 --> 00:54:27,300 Consider the mass rapes aimed at 1737 00:54:27,300 --> 00:54:29,100 enforced pregnancy perpetrated 1738 00:54:29,100 --> 00:54:30,900 in the former Yugoslavia in the 1739 00:54:30,900 --> 00:54:32,266 1990s. 1740 00:54:32,266 --> 00:54:34,133 This atrocity left some female 1741 00:54:34,133 --> 00:54:36,200 survivors little more than 1742 00:54:36,200 --> 00:54:38,000 gestating corpses, social 1743 00:54:38,000 --> 00:54:40,266 outcasts, unmarriageable, their 1744 00:54:40,266 --> 00:54:42,233 offspring unassimilable. 1745 00:54:42,233 --> 00:54:43,866 What had they to look forward to 1746 00:54:43,866 --> 00:54:45,733 other than life-long Post 1747 00:54:45,733 --> 00:54:47,133 Traumatic Stress? 1748 00:54:47,133 --> 00:54:48,600 Would their fate have been worse 1749 00:54:48,600 --> 00:54:50,300 if they had been killed? 1750 00:54:50,300 --> 00:54:52,300 The worst harm that Immanuel 1751 00:54:52,300 --> 00:54:53,533 Kant was able to imagine was to 1752 00:54:53,533 --> 00:54:55,300 be treated merely as a means to 1753 00:54:55,300 --> 00:54:57,300 the ends of others, to have 1754 00:54:57,300 --> 00:54:58,666 one's humanity utterly 1755 00:54:58,666 --> 00:55:01,066 disrespected, devalued, to be 1756 00:55:01,066 --> 00:55:02,966 treated as a thing. 1757 00:55:02,966 --> 00:55:04,533 Hannah Arendt identified an even 1758 00:55:04,533 --> 00:55:06,400 worse harm, namely, to have 1759 00:55:06,400 --> 00:55:07,833 one's humanity utterly 1760 00:55:07,833 --> 00:55:09,600 destroyed. 1761 00:55:09,600 --> 00:55:11,333 Extreme social death comes close 1762 00:55:11,333 --> 00:55:15,266 to that idea. 1763 00:55:15,266 --> 00:55:17,300 What about the question 1764 00:55:17,300 --> 00:55:18,600 is genocide redundant as a 1765 00:55:18,600 --> 00:55:20,800 crime, given other war crimes 1766 00:55:20,800 --> 00:55:23,900 and crimes against humanity? 1767 00:55:23,900 --> 00:55:25,133 The idea of crimes against 1768 00:55:25,133 --> 00:55:26,666 humanity was defended as 1769 00:55:26,666 --> 00:55:28,533 distinct from war crimes on the 1770 00:55:28,533 --> 00:55:30,600 ground that it can be committed 1771 00:55:30,600 --> 00:55:32,466 outside the context of war and 1772 00:55:32,466 --> 00:55:33,766 against a country's own 1773 00:55:33,766 --> 00:55:34,900 nationals. 1774 00:55:34,900 --> 00:55:36,300 The idea of the crime of 1775 00:55:36,300 --> 00:55:37,833 genocide can be defended as a 1776 00:55:37,833 --> 00:55:39,300 special kind of crime against 1777 00:55:39,300 --> 00:55:41,633 humanity that inflicts a harm, 1778 00:55:41,633 --> 00:55:43,366 namely, social death, that is 1779 00:55:43,366 --> 00:55:45,433 not captured by other crimes 1780 00:55:45,433 --> 00:55:47,100 against humanity and that tends 1781 00:55:47,100 --> 00:55:49,066 to be more severe and pervasive 1782 00:55:49,066 --> 00:55:53,066 in its effects. 1783 00:55:53,066 --> 00:55:54,233 What about the question whether 1784 00:55:54,233 --> 00:55:55,600 genocide the worst crime or the 1785 00:55:55,600 --> 00:55:58,200 greatest evil imaginable? 1786 00:55:58,200 --> 00:56:00,466 If social death is central to 1787 00:56:00,466 --> 00:56:02,666 one's understanding of genocide, 1788 00:56:02,666 --> 00:56:04,466 how severe it is depends on the 1789 00:56:04,466 --> 00:56:06,033 degree of the loss of social 1790 00:56:06,033 --> 00:56:08,066 vitality, the forms those losses 1791 00:56:08,066 --> 00:56:10,000 take, and whether any form of 1792 00:56:10,000 --> 00:56:13,166 social vitality is recoverable. 1793 00:56:13,166 --> 00:56:14,566 Forced assimilation and 1794 00:56:14,566 --> 00:56:16,600 transportation of children can 1795 00:56:16,600 --> 00:56:19,266 result in very great losses of 1796 00:56:19,266 --> 00:56:21,166 social vitality. 1797 00:56:21,166 --> 00:56:22,633 But if there remains the 1798 00:56:22,633 --> 00:56:24,733 possibility of regeneration, and 1799 00:56:24,733 --> 00:56:27,366 if there remain remnants of 1800 00:56:27,366 --> 00:56:28,966 social vitality, it would 1801 00:56:28,966 --> 00:56:30,433 probably have been worse to kill 1802 00:56:30,433 --> 00:56:32,033 the children or to enslave them 1803 00:56:32,033 --> 00:56:33,233 than to transport and try to 1804 00:56:33,233 --> 00:56:35,466 assimilate them. 1805 00:56:35,466 --> 00:56:36,566 By the way, on this 1806 00:56:36,566 --> 00:56:37,900 understanding of genocide, we 1807 00:56:37,900 --> 00:56:39,166 can view the kidnapping, 1808 00:56:39,166 --> 00:56:40,266 selling, and transport of 1809 00:56:40,266 --> 00:56:42,300 Africans to the New World to be 1810 00:56:42,300 --> 00:56:45,333 slaves as a genocidal project. 1811 00:56:45,333 --> 00:56:46,833 The destruction of the slaves' 1812 00:56:46,833 --> 00:56:48,233 social vitality may not have 1813 00:56:48,233 --> 00:56:50,233 been a by-product. 1814 00:56:50,233 --> 00:56:51,766 Even if it was, that destruction 1815 00:56:51,766 --> 00:56:53,766 was a reasonably foreseeable and 1816 00:56:53,766 --> 00:56:56,266 accepted price of having slaves 1817 00:56:56,266 --> 00:56:57,633 and so, I think, should count as 1818 00:56:57,633 --> 00:56:59,233 part of the perpetrators' 1819 00:56:59,233 --> 00:57:01,666 intent, broadly construed. 1820 00:57:01,666 --> 00:57:03,400 Even if not every genocide is 1821 00:57:03,400 --> 00:57:05,400 the worst imaginable crime, that 1822 00:57:05,400 --> 00:57:06,766 does not preclude the judgment 1823 00:57:06,766 --> 00:57:08,666 that the Holocaust is the worst 1824 00:57:08,666 --> 00:57:10,300 atrocity perpetrated within 1825 00:57:10,300 --> 00:57:13,266 recorded history. 1826 00:57:13,266 --> 00:57:15,200 If you take as central to 1827 00:57:15,200 --> 00:57:16,466 defining the Holocaust the 1828 00:57:16,466 --> 00:57:17,966 projects of its perpetrators, 1829 00:57:17,966 --> 00:57:19,300 the Holocaust was much more than 1830 00:57:19,300 --> 00:57:20,566 a genocide. 1831 00:57:20,566 --> 00:57:21,766 First, it was more than one 1832 00:57:21,766 --> 00:57:22,900 genocide. 1833 00:57:22,900 --> 00:57:24,600 Second, it included terrorism, 1834 00:57:24,600 --> 00:57:26,700 torture, and deprivations that 1835 00:57:26,700 --> 00:57:28,700 Primo Levi well-described as 1836 00:57:28,700 --> 00:57:30,866 "useless violence," which were 1837 00:57:30,866 --> 00:57:32,500 superfluous even for the aims of 1838 00:57:32,500 --> 00:57:34,666 the genocides. 1839 00:57:34,666 --> 00:57:37,400 And so, even if genocide is not 1840 00:57:37,400 --> 00:57:39,333 necessarily the worst imaginable 1841 00:57:39,333 --> 00:57:41,233 crime, that does not mean that 1842 00:57:41,233 --> 00:57:44,966 the Holocaust wasn't. 1843 00:57:44,966 --> 00:57:47,166 [applause]