>> FUNDING FOR OVERHEARD
WITH EVAN SMITH IS PROVIDED
IN PART BY THE MATTSSON
MCHALE FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT
OF PUBLIC TELEVISION.
ALSO BY MFI FOUNDATION,
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF
LIFE WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY.
AND FROM THE TEXAS BOARD OF
LEGAL SPECIALIZATION, BOARD
CERTIFIED ATTORNEYS IN YOUR
COMMUNITY.
EXPERIENCED, RESPECTED AND
TESTED.
ALSO BY HILLCO PARTNERS,
TEXAS GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
CONSULTANCY, AND ITS GLOBAL
HEALTH CARE CONSULTING
BUSINESS UNIT, HILLCO
HEALTH.
AND BY THE ALICE KLEBERG
REYNOLDS FOUNDATION AND
VIEWERS LIKE YOU.
THANK YOU.
>> I'M EVAN SMITH.
HE'S A BEST SELLING,
CRITICALLY ACCLAIMED AUTHOR
OH HAS BEEN WRITING ABOUT
THE MEDIA BUSINESS FOR 25
YEARS, LAST 11 FOR THE "NEW
YORK TIMES".
HE'S DAVID CARR.
THIS IS OVERHEARD.
>> DAVID CARR, WELCOME.
>> NICE TO BE HERE.
>> ALWAYS NICE TO SEE YOU.
LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT YOUR
PAPER, THE "NEW YORK TIMES".
MANY OF US READ IT HERE AND
ELSEWHERE.
NEWS THE LAST COUPLE OF
WEEKS, YOU HAD SOME
DEPARTURES FROM PEOPLE WHO
HAD BEEN IN THE PAPER FOR A
LONG TIME, NAMES WE KNEW,
LEFT.
HOW ARE THE MOODS AROUND THE
OFFICE?
WHAT'S THE STATE OF THINGS
THERE?
>> I THINK PEOPLE SPEND FAR
TOO MUCH TIME WORRYING ABOUT
THE MOOD OF THE "NEW YORK
TIMES" AND NOT ENOUGH TIME
SORT OF LOOKING AT THE
PRODUCT.
WE ALL WOULD LIKE TO THINK
THAT WE'RE ABSOLUTELY
ESSENTIAL TO WHAT HAPPENS
THERE.
AND IF WE LOSE SOMEBODY AS
TALENTED AND AS GOOD AS JOHN
GEDDIS, OUR MANAGING EDITOR
AND JOHN LANDON WHO PLAYED A
SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE
JASON BLAIR INCIDENT, ALL OF
A SUDDEN THE WHEELS ARE
GOING TO FLY OFF THE CART.
NEVER HAPPENS.
NEWSPAPER IS -- IT'S AN
ORGANIC PROCESS THAT EMERGES
FROM THE SPACE BETWEEN
PEOPLE.
AND THE "NEW YORK TIMES", AS
I LEARNED QUICKLY WHEN I GOT
THERE, IS CERTAINLY -- DOES
NOT DEPEND ON ANY SINGLE
PERSON TO BE WHAT IT IS.
I'VE EXPERIENCE WHERE HAD --
I'VE BEEN UP AGAINST -- THEY
DON'T GENERALLY HAND ME
DEADLINE MATTERS, BUT A
COUPLE OF TIMES I'VE BEEN IN
TIGHT CORNERS AND REALLY UP
AGAINST IMPOSSIBLE ODDS IN
TERMS OF GETTING THE COPY
AND MAKING SURE IT'S
EFFICACIOUS AND HAVE PEOPLE
COME AND PICK ME UP.
>> THERE ARE ALWAYS NEW
PEOPLE WHO CAN DO THAT SORT
OF THING.
>> I WOULD READ IT IN THE
MORNING AND THINK IT'S HARD
TO BELIEVE THAT I WAS
INVOLVED ACTUALLY.
[LAUGHTER]
>> DON'T YOU THINK THE
REASON THAT WE'VE GOTTEN TO
PAY SUCH CLOSE ATTENTION TO
THINGS LIKE WHAT JUST
HAPPENED AT THE TIMES OR THE
DECISION BY TIME WARNER TO
SPIN OFF THE TIME MAGAZINE
GROUP IS BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN
REELING THESE MANY YEARS,
FIVE YEARS, 10 YEARS, MEDIA
BUSINESS HAS BEEN IN A STATE
OF GREAT FLUX AND WE'RE ALL
CURIOUS TO SEE HOW IT SHAKES
OUT.
WE CAN'T QUITE TELL YOU HOW
IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.
>> YEAH.
I WOULD BE CAREFUL ABOUT
CONFLATING THOSE TWO THINGS.
YOU HAVE TIME WARNER, WHICH
IS STEVE ROSS TOOK AND BUILT
UP A BEHEMOTH OVER THE TERMS
OF MANY, MANY YEARS AND IT
TURNED INTO THE LARGEST
MEDIA COMPANY IN THE WORLD
AND WE'VE WATCHED IT THROW
OFF PARTS AGAIN AND AGAIN.
THE FACT THAT THE LAST PART
TO GO, TO BE STUNNED, IS THE
GROUP OF MAGAZINES THAT
BEARS ITS NAME.
>> YOU THINK THAT'S
SIGNIFICANT.
>> YEAH, IN MANHATTAN MEDIA.
AND THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT WE
MADE, IF YOU THINK OF JILL
ABRAM SON, WHO I KNOW YOU
KNOW.
>> BEEN ON THE SHOW.
>> SHE'S A NEWSMAN TO HER
CORE.
I THINK SHE'S GOT THE
CONFIDENCE OF THE ROOM
MOSTLY BECAUSE OF THE PAPER
SHE MAKES.
SHE'S BEEN A GREAT REPORTER.
SHE'S BEEN A GOOD EDITOR.
AND IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT
MAKING WHAT I WOULD SEE AS
SOME ADJUSTMENTS ON THE COST
SIDE, I THINK IT'S REALLY
HEALTHY TO BE UP TO THE TOP
AND LOOK AROUND.
THINK OF HOW HEALTHY THE
"NEW YORK TIMES" IS
STRUCTURED, WHICH IS IT'S
THE TOP OF A MOUNTAIN AT THE
TOP OF A MOUNTAIN
PROFESSIONALLY.
SO IT GATHERS ALL THESE
PEOPLE.
AND SO -- THERE'S THIS
TREMENDOUS PRESSURE AND AT A
CERTAIN POINT SOMETHING HAS
GOT TO GIVE SO YOU END UP
WITH A REAL THICK LAYER ON
TOP HERE BECAUSE NO ONE EVER
WANTS TO GO ANYWHERE.
AND SO NOBODY ENDS UP EVER
THROWN OVERBOARD OR URGED TO
MOVE ON.
IF YOU'RE HER AND -- I DON'T
KNOW.
IT'S KIND OF NAUGHTY TO TALK
ABOUT, BUT IT IS OVERHEARD.
>> IT IS.
[LAUGHTER]
AND WHEN YOU SAY GNAWTY I
BECOME ALL EARS AT THAT VERY
MOMENT.
>> BUT LET'S SAY THAT YOU'RE
RUNNING A LARGE ORGANIZATION
OF 1200 PEOPLE AND YOU GET
SIX, SEVEN YEARS TO HANG ON
TO THIS FLAMING BATON AND GO
AS FAR AS YOU WANT.
IF YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE SOME
STRATEGIC COST ADJUSTMENTS,
WHY NOT MAKE THEM AT THE TOP
TO START SO YOU CAN GET YOUR
GUYS IN, IN POSITION, AND
THEN HAVE -- THAT'S YOUR
GAME THAT YOU'RE GOING TO
RIDE WITH FOR AWHILE.
SO IF SHE EVER DOES HAVE TO
COME BACK TO THE ROOM AND
LOOK FOR ANY OTHER CUTS, WE
WON'T BE SAYING TO HER, AS
WE WOULD, WHAT ABOUT ALL
THESE FAT CATS MAKING ALL
THIS MONEY?
ABOUT WHAT ABOUT ALL THESE
BOSSES THAT YOU HAVE RUNNING
AROUND?
I THINK THE OPTICS ARE GOOD
FOR HER.
I'M NOT -- THAT'S JUST MY
OPINION, BUT IF IT WAS MY
STORE TO RUN, I DON'T THINK
I WOULD DO IT MUCH DIFFERENT
THAN SHE DID, EVEN THOUGH
THE FOLKS THAT WE HAD
REALLY, REALLY TALENTED
FOLKS.
>> LET ME TURN THIS AROUND
AND ASK YOU A BROADER
QUESTION, WHICH HAS THE
TIMES BEEN ABLE TO WEATHER
THE CHANGES TO THE MEDIA
BUSINESS BETTER THAN, IN
YOUR OPINION, OTHER
NEWSPAPERS AT ITS LEVEL OR
DOWN THE FOOD CHAIN SOME OF
THE REGIONAL AND STATE
PAPERS, THE BIG ONES.
ARE THE TIMES LESS
VULNERABLE TO THOSE CHANGES?
>> WHAT I SAY IS IT'S LESS
IMPORTANT THAN WHAT OUR
PAPER DOES.
AND SO, YOU KNOW, I GET
HAMBURGERS FOR MY FAMILY BY
WORKING FOR THE "NEW YORK
TIMES".
SO OF COURSE I'M GOING TO
SAY EVERYTHING IS HUNKY-DORY
AND GREAT.
I WOULD POINT TO SOME
SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL ISSUES
AND SORT OF -- YOU KNOW, IF
YOU LOOK BACK A COUPLE OF
YEARS AGO, WE OWED
$250 MILLION TO A MEXICAN
BILLIONAIRE.
PROBABLY NOT A GREAT GUY TO
OWE MONEY TOO.
JUST IN TERMS OF YOUR
CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND STUFF.
WE WERE -- SO HE LENT US
THAT MONEY, GREAT GUY, THANK
YOU, AT USURIOUS RATES AND
WE PAID THAT LOAN OFF EARLY.
WE HAVE LIKE EVERYONE ELSE
FACED SIGNIFICANT SECULAR,
MEANING BROAD INDUSTRIAL
CHANGES AND CYCLICAL MEANING
WHATEVER IS GOING ON WITH
THE ECONOMY.
HEAD WINDS IN TERMS OF
ADVERTISING AND LARGE PRINT
ENTERPRISES GENERALLY
MANEUVER BY PUSHING TWO
PEDALS.
ONE IS THE AD SIDE, THE
BUSINESS SIDE.
AND THE OTHER SIDE IS THE
CONSUMER SIDE, THE
CIRCULATION SIDE.
WE DECIDED TWO YEARS AGO
THIS WEEK TO TURN TOWARD THE
CONSUMERS AND SAY HOW'S
ABOUT SHOWING US SOME SUGAR?
HOW'S ABOUT YOU GET INVOLVED
HERE A LITTLE BIT?
WE HAVE 40 MILLION UNIQUES
ON THE WEB AND MANY PEOPLE
SAID WE WOULD DISAPPEAR FROM
THE ECOSYSTEM.
THAT THE FACT THAT THE WALL
WAS LEAKY WOULD MAKE US A
LAUGHING STOCK.
NOW WE HAVE OVER 240,000
DIGITAL CONSUMERS AND
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF
DOLLARS IN REVENUE AND FOR
THE FIRST TIME IN OUR
HISTORY NOW CIRCULATION
REVENUES OUT RANK
ADVERTISING REVENUES, WHICH
IS A VERY SIGNAL MOMENT.
>> GETTING THE LAST LAUGH.
I KNOW THEY'VE TIGHTENED UP
THE POROUSNESS OR CLOSED UP
SOME OF THE POROUSNESS OF
THE PAY WALL WITHIN THE LAST
FEW MONTHS, BUT BY AND LARGE
WHAT THEY PUT INTO EFFECT
HAS WORKED.
>> I THINK PEOPLE HAVE BEEN
REALLY SURPRISED BY THE
LEVEL OF HOW WELL IT'S
WORKED.
AND IT'S BEEN GREAT FOR ME
PERSONALLY BECAUSE WHEN I
WAS AT SOUTH BY SOUTHWEST
TWO YEARS AGO ON THIS DATE,
IT WAS ALL THE THEOLOGIANS
RANTING AND THE RELIGIOUS
BELIEF AND THE SPIRITUAL
POWER OF FREE AND FOR ME
IT'S BEEN JUST A JOY TO
WATCH THAT THEY WERE WRONG
AND WE WERE RIGHT.
[LAUGHTER] AND THAT THAT
MAGIC BUNCH OF FREE READERS
THAT'S NOT GOING TO PAY
ANYTHING, THAT WILL NOT DRAW
MUCH IN TERMS OF
ADVERTISING, IS SOMEHOW
GOING TO TAKE TO YOU SOME
SAFE AND HAPPY PROMISED
LAND.
DIDN'T HAPPEN.
PART OF -- TO YOUR QUESTION,
I SHOULD ACTUALLY ANSWER IT.
I SEE THE NEWSPAPER BUSINESS
IN TWO SEGMENTS.
LARGE NATIONAL BRANDS, WALL
STREET JOURNAL, "NEW YORK
TIMES", FT GUARDIAN,
INTERNATIONAL BRANDS, DOING
PRETTY WELL BECAUSE IF
YOU'RE AN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
PAPER, THE SECOND AND THIRD
WORLD, IN ADDITION TO THE
FIRST WORLD, IS HATCHING
CUSTOMERS FOR YOU
EVERYWHERE.
AND BECAUSE YOU DON'T NEED A
TRUCK OR A PRINTING PRESS TO
GET WITH THEM, YOU CAN START
ACCESSING THOSE PEOPLE.
THE OTHER PART OF THE
BUSINESS DOING VERY WELL IS
IF YOU'RE THE KIND OF PAPER
WHERE PEOPLE WILL TEAR OUT A
PICTURE OF YOUR KID PLAYING
THIRD BASE FOR THE LOCAL
LITTLE LEAGUE TEAM AND
PUTTING IT ON THE
REFRIGERATOR, THE WEBSITE'S
NEVER GOING TO DO THAT FOR
YOU.
THE PHRASE I SAW YOUR KID IN
THE PAPER, THAT'S REALLY
MEANINGFUL.
AND THE COMMUNITY PAPERS
THAT HAVE A VERY CLOSE
RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR
CUSTOMER AGREE IT'S A VAST
MIDDLE.
>> IT IS A VAST MIDDLE.
>> IT'S WHERE AMERICA STORES
ITS REPORTING HORSE POWERS.
>> WAS ANY OF THIS
PREVENTABLE, DAVID?
YOU'VE BEEN WRITING ABOUT IT
FOR A LONG TIME.
YOU'VE LOOKED AT IT FROM
ALMOST EVERY ANGLE.
AND YOU PROBABLY FORMULATED
AN OPINION ABOUT WHETHER
SOME OF THE THINGS THAT GOT
SOME OF THE PAPERS IN THE
VAST MIDDLE INTO TROUBLE
OVER THESE YEARS WERE BEYOND
THEIR CONTROL OR WHETHER IN
HINDSIGHT THEY COULD HAVE
PREVENTED THEM.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
>> IN RETROSPECT NOTHING
CHANGED, NOTHING CHANGED,
NOTHING CHANGED.
BOOM, EVERYTHING CHANGED.
AND THE LAST FIVE YEARS THE
NEWSPAPER BUSINESS HAS
SHRUNK BY HALF.
WE'VE LOST A LOT OF
REPORTERS, A LOT OF DAILIES.
AND WHEN NEWSPAPERS IN MID
SIZE MARKETS HAD THOSE
MONOPOLIES AND WERE LOOKING
FOR PLACES TO STOP ALL THE
MONEY THAT THEY WERE MAKING,
ONE OF THE THINGS THEY
PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN
DOING IS PUTTING MONEY INTO
TRANSFORMATION.
AND IT'S HARD WHEN YOU'RE --
WHEN YOU'RE GOING IN REVERSE
TO CHANGE THE WHEELS ON THE
CAR.
SO THERE WERE PEOPLE THAT
WERE SORT OF FORWARD
THINKING, BUT IT DIDN'T WORK
OUT FOR THEM.
THINK OF THE AMOUNT OF
INVESTMENT AND TIME THAT THE
WASHINGTON POST PUT IN THE
DIGITAL MATTERS.
AND HERE WE ARE LO THESE
MANY YEARS LATER AND I THINK
WE COULD AGREE THAT THEY
HAVEN'T REALLY ACCOMPLISHED
THAT MUCH.
>> NOT MUCH FARTHER AHEAD.
WHAT WAS THE BOOM?
YOU SAID NOTHING, NOTHING,
NOTHING, BOOM.
WHAT WAS THE BOOM?
DEFINE THE BOOM.
WHAT WAS THE PRECIPITATING
EVENT?
>> NEWSPAPERS MAKE THEIR --
WE MAKE OUR LIVING OFF OF --
SORT OF A NEWSPAPER STORY IS
WE'RE ON THE UNIVERSITY OF
TEXAS CAMPUS RIGHT NOW.
THOSE KIDS DON'T CARE ABOUT
NEWSPAPERS OTHER THAN THEIR
COLLEGE PAPER, WHICH IS AN
AMAZING ONE, GREAT ONE.
BUT THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT
OUR BUSINESS.
AND WE DON'T GENERALLY CATER
TO THEM IN THE OLDEN DAYS,
WHICH WEREN'T THAT LONG AGO.
WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IS THEY
WOULD LEAVE COLLEGE, THEY
WOULD GET JOBS, THEY WOULD
REPRODUCE, THEY WOULD GO TO
IKEA.
THEY WOULD HAVE TO -- THEY
WOULD HAVE TO FIGURE OUT
WHERE TO SEND JOHNNIE TO
SCHOOL.
THEN WE WOULD GRAB 'EM
BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE
INFORMATIONAL NEEDS, THEY
WOULD HAVE MARKETING NEEDS.
NOW THEY GRADUATE, DO THEY
GET A JOB?
DO THEY GET MARRIED?
DO THEY HAVE A NEED FOR --
THERE'S PROBABLY A BLOG
ABOUT THE SCHOOL THAT THEIR
KID'S GOING TO GO TO AND
THEY PROBABLY ALREADY HAVE A
DIRECT MARKETING
RELATIONSHIP.
IKEA PROBABLY NODES WHAT
THEIR ZIP CODE IS AND HOW
THEY LIKE THEIR COFFEE
TABLES.
>> IKEA HAS CUT YOU OUT OF
THE SITUATION BY GOING
DIRECTLY TO THE CUSTOMER.
>> EVERY TIME I SEE A
SWEDISH PERSON I WANT TO
CHOKE 'EM [LAUGHTER]
>> VERY UPLIFTING THOUGHT.
YOU SPOKE AT IOWA STATE
UNIVERSITY IN THE LAST
COUPLE OF WEEKS.
>> YES, I DO.
>> YOU TALKED ABOUT THE
EXISTENTIAL SORT OF CRISES
THAT KIDS COMING OUT OF
SCHOOL FACE.
THEY GO OUT OF A WORLD
THAT'S VASTLY DIFFERENT FOR
THEIR GENERATION, LET ALONE
OUR GENERATION ENCOUNTERED.
IT'S DIFFERENT FROM EVERY
ANGLE.
HOWEVER YOU LOOK AT IT THE
WORLD HAS CHANGED.
>> I ENVY THEM.
>> YOU DO?
TELL ME WHY.
>> MY DAUGHTER IS IN OUR
BUSINESS AND SHE WORKS FOR
AN OUTFIT CALLED VICE, WHICH
IS A BROOKLYN BASED
MULTIMEDIA COMPANY.
AND SHE MADE THIS VIDEO
ABOUT THESE LITTLE
MICROORGANISMS THAT ARE
CALLED TARTAGRADES AND THEY
CAN SURVIVE IN OUTER SPACE
BECAUSE THEY CAN PULL
THEMSELVES INTO A BALL AND
SURVIVE IN EXTREMES OF
TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE.
AND SHE FOUND THIS REALLY
POETIC, BEAUTIFUL, NATURAL.
IT WAS AN AMAZING STORY
TELLER.
AND SHE SENT ME THE VIDEO
AND, YOU KNOW, I DID WHAT
ALL DADS DO, WHICH IS HONEY,
THAT'S ADORABLE.
YOU'RE JUST THE BEST.
I'M SO PROUD OF YOU.
YOU MADE THIS GREAT VIDEO.
AND SHE PUT IT UP THE NEXT
DAY AND SAID I GOT
10 MILLION HITS ON YOUTUBE.
AND IT'S JUST LIKE, THINGS
ARE REALLY DIFFERENCE.
>> THIS IS A LITTLE
DIFFERENT.
[LAUGHTER].
>> THE AUDIENCE IS
UNLIMITED.
>> SO I THINK IN THAT
FRICTION FREE ATMOSPHERE
WHERE YOU ARE IN THE
EXCELLENCE OF YOUR CONTACT
ACHIEVE A BOUNDLESS SORT OF
RELATIONSHIP WITH YOUR
AUDIENCE -- PLUS THINK OF
WHAT'S JUST EVEN IN MY
BACKPACK RIGHT NOW IN TERMS
OF REPORTING FIREPOWER.
IF I WAS GOING TO DO A STORY
ABOUT YOU, I HAVE ALL KNOWN
THOUGHT ABOUT YOU ONE CLICK
AWAY.
AND IF YOU SAID SOMETHING
INCONSISTENT, EVEN THOUGH
YOU NEVER DO, EVAN --
>> WHY WOULD I DO THAT?
>> OF COURSE NOT.
I WOULD BE ABLE TO CALL YOU
OUT ON THE SPOT.
IF I GOT DONE INTERVIEWING
YOU AND DID A PIECE -- I
JUST DID A PIECE ON ONE OF
THE GUYS THAT MADE SOUTH
PARK, MATT STONE.
I GOT DONE TALKING TO THEM
AND SAID DO YOU MIND MAKING
A LITTLE VIDEO.
WE MADE A LITTLE iPHONE
VIDEO THAT WENT UP.
THINK OF SOURCING.
WHEN I FIRST CAME IN TO THE
ROOM, IF YOU HAD A PHONE
NUMBER THEY COULD PICK IT
UP.
YOU COULD DOORSTEP THEM,
JUMP OUT OF THE BUSHES, I'M
HERE!
BUT THINK OF NOW YOU CAN
FIGURE OUT THE NOMENCLATURE
OF THEIR EMAIL.
YOU CAN FIND THEM ON LINKED
IN.
YOU'RE EVERYWHERE.
YOU'RE LIKE JASON IN A
HOCKEY MASK.
YOU JUST KEEP POPPING UP AND
POPPING UP.
>> AND THE LAYER THAT USED
TO PROTECT THEM HAVE REALLY
BEEN OBLITERATED BY OUR
INSTANT ACCESS TO THEM
THROUGH MANY OF THE FORMS
AND TECHNOLOGY YOU'RE
TALKING ABOUT.
>> AND YOU DEVELOP A MUCH
MORE INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP.
IF YOU'RE TRYING TO GET TO
SOMEBODY YOU MIGHT CC THE
FLACK, THE PR PERSON --
>> JUST TO GO THROUGH THE
FRONT DOOR.
>> BUT YOU'RE REALLY TALKING
TO THE WOMAN OR THE MAN YOU
WANT TO TALK TO.
>> DIRECTLY.
SO CRAFT HAS CHANGED IN MANY
OF THE WAYS YOU'RE TALKING
ABOUT.
I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT TWO
OTHER WAYS THAT I THINK OUR
WORLD HAS CHANGED AS IT
RELATES TO THE STATE OF THE
NEWSPAPER.
ONE IS THAT TWITTER IN
PARTICULAR, BUT SOCIAL MEDIA
GENERALLY HAVE CREATED AN
ENTIRELY DIFFERENT CHANNEL
FOR THE CONVERSATION ABOUT
WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE WORLD
TO TAKE PLACE.
PART OF IT IS A REFERRAL
CHANNEL, BUT PART OF IT IS A
REPORTING CHANNEL REALLY.
I KNOW YOU'RE A BIG TWITTER
AFICIONADO.
TWITTER IS LIKE THE
ASSOCIATED PRESS WIRE OF THE
CURRENT GENERATION, THE
CURRENT MEDIA CONSUMER
GENERATION BECAUSE WE FIND
OUT SO MUCH ON SOCIAL MEDIA
AND IT MIGHT CAUSE US TO GO
BACK TO NEWS SITES LIKE THE
"NEW YORK TIMES" OR WHATEVER
ELSE, BUT WE LEARN STUFF NOW
THROUGH A TOTALLY DIFFERENT
CHANNEL THAT DIDN'T EXIST
JUST A SHORT TIME AGO.
THAT SEEMS SIGNIFICANT.
>> IT'S REALLY SIGNIFICANT.
I MEAN, I -- I'M ALWAYS
CAREFUL NOT TO OVEREMPHASIZE
ITS SIGNIFICANCE BECAUSE
TWITTER IS KIND OF LIKE A
COASTAL SORT OF HOT HOUSE.
THOSE OF US IN THE MEDIA
LOVE THE TWITTER BECAUSE IT
HAS THIS DENSITY OF
INFORMATION BECAUSE PEOPLE
ARE ON IT AGAIN AND AGAIN.
BUT AS SOMEBODY IN THE
BUSINESS, THE ABILITY TO
KEEP AN EYE ON MY
COMPETITORS, TO STAY IN
NARRATIVE WITH PEOPLE, I
RESPECT OVER AND OVER.
THINK OF WHEN RSS FIRST CAME
IN AND OH, HERE IT IS, THE
10 STORIES I WANT TO BE
TRACKING.
NOW THINK OF THAT RSS AS
REALTIME ALWAYS ON, CURE
RATED BY PEOPLE LIKE YOU OR
PEOPLE LIKE ME.
AND PEOPLE -- PEOPLE
UNFAMILIAR WITH TWITTER
DON'T REALIZE THAT THE
LENGTHS THAT IT CARRIES,
YEAH, YOU CAN PUT A LOT OF
INFORMATION ON 140
INFORMATION, BUT YOU CAN
POINT TOWARD VERY IMPORTANT
THINGS.
AND IF I FOLLOW PEOPLE I
FEEL LIKE I'M IN REALTIME
NARRATIVE AT THAT ABSOLUTE
MOMENT.
IT'S NOT PERFECT.
I STILL GET THE DAILY PAPER
AND IT'S PARTLY BECAUSE ALL
DAY LONG STUFF IS WHIZZING
BY AND IT'S GREAT.
I CAN CATCH UP ON THE NEWS
AT STARBUCKS AND WHAT'S
BOUNCING AT THAT INSTANCE.
THE NEXT DAY I ALWAYS GO,
WHAT WAS THAT?
>> WHAT HAPPENED?
>> WHAT HAPPENED?
AND SO WITH THE TIMES OR THE
WALL STREET JOURNAL, THEY'RE
DECIDING ON THE HIERARCHY OF
THESE ARE THE SIX OR SEVEN
MOST IMPORTANT STORIES.
>> WE SAY ARE THE MOST
IMPORTANT.
>> ARE THEY? PROBABLY NOT.
BUT I'M WILLING TO SAY OKAY?
YOU GUYS HAVE DECIDED WHAT'S
IMPORTANT.
AND IN THAT SENSE I THINK
WHEN YOU COME FROM MAGAZINES
YOU KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING
IS GIVING PEOPLE, PUTTING A
FRAME AROUND EVENTS THAT
ADDS MEANING TO IT.
AND I DO THINK THAT DAILY
PAPER HAS MOVED MORE AND
MORE ADD ITS BEST TOWARD
HELPING YOU MAKE SENSE OF
THIS CONSTANT ALWAYS ON.
WHEN I FIRST GOT TO THE "NEW
YORK TIMES" I WOULD WATCH
THEM CHOOSE THOSE SIX OR
SEVEN STORIES.
I WOULD GO TO THE PAGE ONE
MEETING.
AGAIN, NOT CONSULTED, JUST
SITTING THERE.
POTTED PLANT BASICALLY.
[LAUGHTER]
AND I WOULD WATCH THE
STORIES SORT OF PIVOT AND
CHANGE AROUND THEM.
I WOULD SAY THIS IS
LUDICROUS THAT THEY'RE
TALKING ABOUT THESE AS IF
THEY'RE STATIC.
I'VE COME AROUND ON THAT.
I STILL GET THE JOURNAL AT
HOME.
I STILL GET --
>> THE COMBINATION OF THE
TRADITIONAL PAPER AND THE
CONSTANTLY INFLUX OF
REALTIME STUFF IS NOT A
BINARY CHOICE, IT'S
ADDITIVE, A AND B IN TERMS
OF YOU UNDERSTANDING WHAT'S
OUT THERE.
>> YEAH.
THERE'S A CHALLENGE THAT
GOES WITH IT, WHICH IS AM I
SO BUSY -- THIS ENDLESS
CYCLE OF PRODUCING AND
CONSUMING MEDIA LIKE NOT
THAT LONG AGO I WROTE
SOMETHING FOR A MAGAZINE
ABOUT NEAL YOUNG AND IT WAS
SUPPOSED TO BE LIKE 5,000
WORDS.
I THOUGHT I HAVEN'T HAD A
THOUGHT THAT WAS LONGER THAN
10 WORDS IN A LONG TIME.
[LAUGHTER]
AND JUST THE CURSOR IS JUST
LIKE BEEP, BEEP, BEEP.
LOOKING AT ME.
>> BUT YOU GOT IT DONE.
>> I SWEATED IT.
AND WHAT I THINK REPORTERS
CONFRONT -- I TALKED EARLIER
ABOUT HOW GREAT IT IS.
BUT THE POINT AT WHICH YOU
EITHER STOP PRODUCING MEDIA
AND START CONSUMING IT OR
STOP CONSUMING IT AND
PRODUCE IT, THINK OF SOUTH
BY SOUTHWEST AND BEING IN
THE MIDDLE OF THAT MALL
STROM.
BY THE END OF THIS WEEK THAT
PERSON THAT WILL KNOW THE
LEAST ABOUT SOUTH BY
SOUTHWEST WILL BE ME.
I'M IN THE THICK OF IT.
I HAVE NO IDEA.
>> HARD TO HAVE PERSPECTIVE
ON IT.
>> YOU HAVE TO PULL BACK A
LITTLE BIT.
I THINK IF YOU'RE A DIGITAL
NATIVE -- I'M OLDER THAN
DIRT, SO I'M LIKE AN
ADOPTER.
BUT IF YOU THINK OF SOMEONE
I WORK WITH LIKE BRYAN OR
AMY, WHERE THE NIGHT WHEN
OSAMA BIN LADEN WAS KILLED,
EARLY ON THERE WAS THIS
INDICATION THAT THERE WAS A
TWEET OUT OF ABAD ABAD THAT
GOT THINGS ROLLING AND I
THOUGHT OH MY GOSH, THIS WAS
A MEDIA STORY.
AND FOR A DAILY NEWSPAPER
REPORTER, YOU WANT TO SWIM
TOWARD WHATEVER HEAT THERE
IS.
>> ABSOLUTELY.
>> AND IN SEARCH OF THE
ELUSIVE MEDIA ANGLE.
SO I START LOOKING ON THE
WEB AND PRINTING THIS OUT
AND GATHERING THIS IN, AND
JUST ABOUT THE TIME I'M
GOING TO FILE WE HAVE A
MEDIA SITE AT THE "NEW YORK
TIMES" CALLED MEDIA DECODER.
I'M LIKE SOMEBODY SHOULD
WRITE A BLOG POST ABOUT
THIS.
I OPEN IT UP, MY COLLEAGUE
BRYAN HAS 900 WORDS ALREADY
THERE.
AND WHAT HE WAS DOING,
TYPING, PULLING IN, SEEING,
PULLING IN.
AND THAT IS NOT REALLY BAKED
INTO ME.
>> A TALL MICROORGANISM OF
SOMEBODY OF HIS SORT IS A
DIFFERENT THING.
>> FOR AWHILE I COULDN'T
WRITE A COLUMN UNTIL UNLESS
I HAD A FOLDER THE SIZE OF A
HAM SANDWICH WITH ALL MY
IMPORTANT PAPERS ALL MARKED
UP WITH YELLOW STICKIES.
AND BROTHER, THAT ISN'T
GOING TO GET IT.
IT ISN'T GOING TO WORK.
>> YOUR INDIVIDUAL BRAND IS
QUITE POWERFUL.
AND NOT LONG AGO INDIVIDUAL
BRANDS PROBABLY DISCOURAGED
THEIR REPORTERS FROM
STEPPING OUT AS INDIVIDUAL
BRANDS.
THE INSTITUTIONAL BRAND
ALWAYS SUPERCEDED THE
INDIVIDUAL BRAND.
IT NOW SEEMS THAT THE
INDIVIDUAL BRAND AT YOURS AT
PAPERS ARE THE ROCKET
BOOSTER THAT CARRY THE
INSTITUTIONAL BRAND ALONG.
THAT FEELS LIKE A PRETTY
SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO ME.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT IT?
>> I WORKED REAL HARD ON
FITTING IN AT THE "NEW YORK
TIMES" BEFORE I WORKED ON
STICKING OUT.
AND BY FITTING IN I MEAN NOT
ENDING UP ON THE CORRECTIONS
PAGE, NOT GETTING IN A BUNCH
OF JACKPOTS.
NOT BEING KNOWN AS A BAD
COLLEAGUE.
I DO THINK THAT INDIVIDUAL
BRANDS, THAT MORE AND MORE
YOU SEE IN MEDIA COMPANIES,
AS YOU SAY, THEY BECOME
FEDERATIONS OF DIFFERENT
BRANDS.
BUT THINK IF I JUST WALKED
OUT THERE WITH THE TIP CUP.
YOU KNOW, I'M NOT MAUREEN
DOWD, I'M NOT FRANK RICH.
I'M LIKE A TIER UNDERNEATH
THAT.
AND IT'S GOOD THAT I DO
VIDEO AND I BLOG AND -- BUT
IF MY LAST NAME WAS NOT "NEW
YORK TIMES", I WONDER HOW
FANCY THAT BRAND S I THINK
PART OF THE REASON THAT MY
BRAND WORKS, THAT I HAVE A
BRAND AT ALL IS THAT GUY IS
REALLY WEIRD.
I CAN'T BELIEVE HE WORKS AT
THE "NEW YORK TIMES".
[LAUGHTER]
>>
SO THESE TWO THINGS
TOGETHER, IF YOU PULL ONE OR
THE OTHER AWAY, I THINK I'M
JUST --
>> DAVID CARR OF THE "NEW
YORK TIMES" TRUMPS DAVID
CARR WAS DENVER POST.
>> OR DAVID CARR OF
DAVIDCARR.COM.
>> WELL, WE APPRECIATE WHO
YOU ARE.
WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING AND
SITTING WITH US.
>> A PLEASURE.
>> THANK YOU.
DAVID CARR [APPLAUSE]
>> WE'D LOVE TO HAVE YOU
JOIN US IN THE STUDIO.
VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT
KLRU.ORG/OVERHEARD TO FIND
INVITATIONS TO INTERVIEWS, Q
AND AS WITH OUR AUDIENCE AND
GUESTS AN AN ARCHIVE OF PAST
EPISODES.
>> I WRITE ABOUT NEWSPAPERS
AND THEY'RE KIND OF BORING.
I MEAN, IT'S A BUNCH OF
WHITE PEOPLE IN CUBES
TYPING.
IT'S NOT LIKE -- I DON'T
KNOW.
IT'S NOT ARGO, I'VE JUST GOT
TO SAY.
>> FUNDING FOR OVERHEARD
WITH EVAN SMITH IS PROVIDED
IN PART BY THE MATTSSON
MCHALE FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT
OF PUBLIC TELEVISION.
ALSO BY MFI FOUNDATION,
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF
LIFE WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY.
AND FROM THE TEXAS BOARD OF
LEGAL SPECIALIZATION, BOARD
CERTIFIED ATTORNEYS IN YOUR
COMMUNITY.
EXPERIENCED, RESPECTED AND
TESTED.
ALSO BY HILLCO PARTNERS,
TEXAS GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
CONSULTANCY AND IT'S GLOBAL
HEALTH CARE CONSULTING
BUSINESS UNIT, HILLCO
HEALTH.
AND BY THE ALICE KLEBERG
REYNOLDS FOUNDATION, AND
VIEWERS LIKE YOU, THANK YOU.
>> THIS WEEK ON OVERHEARD,
"NEW YORK TIMES" COLUMNIST
DAVID CARR.
>> IF YOU'RE THE KIND OF
PAPER WHERE PEOPLE WILL TEAR
OUT A PICTURE OF THEIR KID
PLAYING THIRD BASE FOR THE
LOCAL LITTLE LEAGUE TEAM AND
PUT IT ON THE REFRIGERATOR,
THE WEBSITE IS NEVER GOING
ON DO THAT FOR YOU.
I THINK PART OF THE REASON
THAT MY BRAND WORKS, THAT I
HAVE A BRAND AT ALL, IS LIKE
THAT GUY'S REALLY WEIRD.
I CAN'T BELIEVE HE WORKS AT
THE "NEW YORK TIMES".