WEBVTT 00:01.166 --> 00:02.166 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> Sreenivasan: TOMORROW THE 00:02.166 --> 00:03.066 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WILL 00:03.066 --> 00:03.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BEGIN HEARINGS ON PRESIDENT 00:03.966 --> 00:05.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% TRUMP'S NOMINEE-- JUDGE AMY 00:05.400 --> 00:06.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% CONEY BARRETT-- TO REPLACE THE 00:06.500 --> 00:07.233 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% LATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RUTH 00:07.233 --> 00:10.000 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BADER GINSBURG. 00:10.000 --> 00:11.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SENATORS WILL SPEAK FOR SEVERAL 00:11.633 --> 00:12.800 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% HOURS BEFORE JUDGE BARRETT MAKES 00:12.800 --> 00:14.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% HER OPENING STATEMENT. 00:14.466 --> 00:16.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% HER REMARKS WERE RELEASED TODAY 00:16.266 --> 00:18.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND INCLUDE HER BELIEF THAT 00:18.400 --> 00:20.166 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% GOVERNMENT AND NOT THE COURTS 00:20.166 --> 00:21.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SHOULD MAKE POLICY AND THAT THE 00:21.633 --> 00:23.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% COURTS ARE "NOT DESIGNED TO 00:23.500 --> 00:25.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SOLVE EVERY PROBLEM OR RIGHT 00:25.433 --> 00:28.833 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% EVERY WRONG IN OUR PUBLIC LIFE." 00:28.833 --> 00:30.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FOR MORE ABOUT THE NOMINEE AND 00:30.266 --> 00:31.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHAT'S AHEAD IN THE HEARINGS I 00:31.966 --> 00:33.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SPOKE WITH AMY HOWE, CO-FOUNDER 00:33.766 --> 00:35.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% OF "THE SCOTUS BLOG" WHO JOINED 00:35.366 --> 00:37.333 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% US FROM WASHINGTON, D.C. 00:37.333 --> 00:39.566 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AMY, IN ANY OTHER WORLD, THE 00:39.566 --> 00:41.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SUPREME COURT NOMINATION WOULD 00:41.700 --> 00:42.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BE FRONT PAGE ABOVE THE FOLD 00:42.400 --> 00:45.100 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% EVERY DAY. 00:45.100 --> 00:46.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BUT SINCE WE SPOKE LAST AT THE 00:46.633 --> 00:48.833 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PASSING OF R.B.G.'S DEATH, THIS 00:48.833 --> 00:49.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% STORY HAS GOTTEN ECLIPSED BY SO 00:49.700 --> 00:50.800 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% MANY OTHER THINGS. 00:50.800 --> 00:52.666 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHAT CAN WE EXPECT TOMORROW? 00:52.666 --> 00:54.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> SO, THEY'RE GOING TO KICK IT 00:54.700 --> 00:57.233 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% OFF WITH STATEMENTS, 00:57.233 --> 00:59.566 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% INTRODUCTIONS FROM INDIANA 00:59.566 --> 01:01.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SENATORS AND FROM PATRICIA 01:01.633 --> 01:02.900 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% O'HARA, WHO IS A FORMER DEAN OF 01:02.900 --> 01:05.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% NOTRE DAME LAW SCHOOL. 01:05.200 --> 01:08.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THEN WE'LL HEAR STATEMENTS 01:08.433 --> 01:10.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FROM JUDGE BARRETT HERSELF AND 01:10.966 --> 01:11.900 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FROM THE SENATORS ON THE SENATE 01:11.900 --> 01:14.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. 01:14.266 --> 01:16.666 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AFTER THAT, THEY WILL MOVE ON TO 01:16.666 --> 01:18.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% QUESTIONS FOR JUDGE BARRETT FROM 01:18.766 --> 01:20.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE SENATORS ON THE COMMITTEE, 01:20.266 --> 01:22.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHICH IS REALLY WHERE THE MEAT 01:22.500 --> 01:24.566 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% OF THE HEARINGS WILL BE. 01:24.566 --> 01:27.100 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THEN WE'LL HEAR TESTIMONY 01:27.100 --> 01:28.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FROM LEGAL EXPERTS AND PEOPLE 01:28.866 --> 01:30.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FROM JUDGE BARRETT'S LIFE 01:30.733 --> 01:32.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SUPPORTING HER NOMINATION AND 01:32.866 --> 01:33.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PROBABLY SOME OPPOSING HER 01:33.766 --> 01:35.166 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% NOMINATION. 01:35.166 --> 01:36.333 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> Sreenivasan: AT THIS POINT, 01:36.333 --> 01:38.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% IF ANYBODY'S WATCHED ANY OF THE 01:38.200 --> 01:39.566 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PREVIOUS TWO NOMINATION 01:39.566 --> 01:40.600 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% HEARINGS, YOU HAVE THE TEAM THAT 01:40.600 --> 01:42.600 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SUPPORTS THE JUSTICE. 01:42.600 --> 01:45.066 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THAT PARTY ASKS EASY QUESTIONS. 01:45.066 --> 01:47.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THE TEAM THAT OPPOSES THE 01:47.200 --> 01:48.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% NOMINEE ASKS VERY DIFFICULT 01:48.266 --> 01:49.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ONES. 01:49.366 --> 01:51.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% GIVEN THE COMPOSITION OF THE 01:51.200 --> 01:52.300 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SENATE, IT'S SORT OF A FOREGONE 01:52.300 --> 01:53.566 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% CONCLUSION AT THIS POINT. 01:53.566 --> 01:54.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> IT CERTAINLY DOES SEEM THAT 01:54.733 --> 01:56.000 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WAY. 01:56.000 --> 01:59.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE REPUBLICANS WOULD NEED 01:59.466 --> 02:01.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SEVERAL SENATORS TO DEFECT, AND 02:01.366 --> 02:02.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THERE'S NO SIGN OF THAT AT THIS 02:02.200 --> 02:03.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% POINT. 02:03.633 --> 02:05.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THERE ARE TWO SENATORS, SENATOR 02:05.400 --> 02:07.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% LISA MURKOWSKI OF ALASKA AND 02:07.500 --> 02:09.533 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SENATOR SUSAN COLLINS OF MAINE, 02:09.533 --> 02:12.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHO HAD SAID THAT THEY WANTED 02:12.466 --> 02:14.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% REPUBLICANS TO WAIT AND NOT VOTE 02:14.366 --> 02:16.233 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ON A NOMINEE BEFORE THE 02:16.233 --> 02:17.333 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ELECTION, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT 02:17.333 --> 02:19.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% EITHER ONE OF THEM HAS COMMITTED 02:19.633 --> 02:21.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% TO NOT VOTING FOR JUDGE BARRETT. 02:21.633 --> 02:22.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SO IT DOES SEEM LIKE SHE HAS THE 02:22.866 --> 02:24.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% VOTES AT THIS POINT. 02:24.966 --> 02:25.933 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I THINK 02:25.933 --> 02:26.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE 02:26.966 --> 02:28.066 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% DISCUSSIONS. 02:28.066 --> 02:29.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% IT'S SORT OF AN OPPORTUNITY. 02:29.366 --> 02:31.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A CIVICS 02:31.366 --> 02:32.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% LESSON, YOU KNOW, IN WHICH THE 02:32.766 --> 02:34.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PARTY THAT IS OPPOSING THE 02:34.966 --> 02:37.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% NOMINEE IN PARTICULAR CAN USE 02:37.466 --> 02:41.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS 02:41.466 --> 02:43.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO, SORT OF, 02:43.633 --> 02:44.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% EDUCATE THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE 02:44.400 --> 02:45.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% NOMINEE. 02:45.633 --> 02:47.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BECAUSE, REMEMBER, UNLIKE THE 02:47.966 --> 02:49.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SENATE, THE SUPREME COURT 02:49.766 --> 02:51.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PROCEEDINGS ARE NOT TELEVISED. 02:51.266 --> 02:52.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND RIGHT NOW, WE'RE ACTUALLY 02:52.433 --> 02:54.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% HEARING THEM BECAUSE OF THE 02:54.466 --> 02:56.166 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PANDEMIC LIVE AUDIO, BUT WE 02:56.166 --> 02:57.066 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% DON'T SEE THE SUPREME COURT IN 02:57.066 --> 02:57.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ACTION, SORT OF. 02:57.866 --> 02:58.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SO WE LEARN A LOT MORE ABOUT 02:58.733 --> 03:01.100 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THIS PERSON. 03:01.100 --> 03:02.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> Sreenivasan: IF THE SENATE 03:02.700 --> 03:04.933 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THE PRESIDENT HAVE THEIR 03:04.933 --> 03:06.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WAY, THIS NOMINATION WRAPS UP 03:06.433 --> 03:07.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION. 03:07.466 --> 03:08.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHAT ARE THE BIG CASES THAT 03:08.700 --> 03:09.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SHE'S GOING TO FACE? 03:09.733 --> 03:10.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> THERE ARE TWO VERY BIG ONES 03:10.700 --> 03:11.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THAT SHE WOULD FACE ALMOST 03:11.433 --> 03:12.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% IMMEDIATELY. 03:12.700 --> 03:14.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE DAY AFTER ELECTION DAY, THE 03:14.466 --> 03:15.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SUPREME COURT WILL HEAR ORAL 03:15.766 --> 03:17.133 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ARGUMENTS IN A CASE CALLED 03:17.133 --> 03:17.800 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% "FULTON VERSUS CITY OF 03:17.800 --> 03:19.566 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PHILADELPHIA." 03:19.566 --> 03:21.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THIS IS A CASE ABOUT THE 03:21.966 --> 03:24.166 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BALANCE BETWEEN RELIGIOUS 03:24.166 --> 03:25.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BELIEFS ON THE ONE HAND, AND 03:25.766 --> 03:26.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS, 03:26.866 --> 03:28.900 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PARTICULARLY ANTI-DISCRIMINATION 03:28.900 --> 03:29.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% LAWS AGAINST L.G.B.T.Q. PEOPLE, 03:29.866 --> 03:31.533 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ON THE OTHER HAND. 03:31.533 --> 03:32.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND IT'S A, SORT OF A SECOND 03:32.733 --> 03:34.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ROUND OF CASES. 03:34.433 --> 03:36.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% MANY OF YOUR VIEWERS MAY 03:36.266 --> 03:38.100 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% REMEMBER FROM A COUPLE OF YEARS 03:38.100 --> 03:40.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AGO A CASE INVOLVING A COLORADO 03:40.200 --> 03:41.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BAKER WHO REFUSED TO MAKE CAKES 03:41.966 --> 03:43.233 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FOR A SAME SEX WEDDING. 03:43.233 --> 03:45.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THE SUPREME COURT IN THAT 03:45.466 --> 03:46.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% CASE RULED FOR THE BAKER, 03:46.866 --> 03:48.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BUT IN A VERY NARROW WAY THAT 03:48.500 --> 03:50.300 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% DIDN'T RESOLVE THE BROADER 03:50.300 --> 03:51.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% QUESTION OF HOW DO YOU BALANCE 03:51.733 --> 03:53.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SOMEONE'S RELIGIOUS BELIEFS 03:53.633 --> 03:54.533 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AGAINST ANTI-DISCRIMINATION 03:54.533 --> 03:55.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% LAWS? 03:55.466 --> 03:57.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND SO, THE QUESTION IS BACK IN 03:57.500 --> 04:00.333 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% A CASE BROUGHT BY CATHOLIC 04:00.333 --> 04:01.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SOCIAL SERVICES IN PHILADELPHIA 04:01.700 --> 04:03.333 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AGAINST THE CITY OF 04:03.333 --> 04:05.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PHILADELPHIA, WHICH WON'T NOW 04:05.466 --> 04:07.233 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% GIVE CONTRACTS TO CATHOLIC 04:07.233 --> 04:09.233 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SOCIAL SERVICES BECAUSE CATHOLIC 04:09.233 --> 04:10.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SOCIAL SERVICES WON'T WORK WITH 04:10.700 --> 04:11.833 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FOSTER CARE PARENTS WHO ARE SAME 04:11.833 --> 04:13.833 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SEX COUPLES. 04:13.833 --> 04:14.833 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> Sreenivasan: HMM. 04:14.833 --> 04:16.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> AND THE SECOND ONE IS A WEEK 04:16.366 --> 04:18.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AFTER ELECTION DAY, AND THAT IS 04:18.400 --> 04:19.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE CHALLENGE TO THE INDIVIDUAL 04:19.500 --> 04:20.300 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% MANDATE OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE 04:20.300 --> 04:22.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ACT. 04:22.733 --> 04:24.533 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THAT IS A CASE THAT BACK IN 04:24.533 --> 04:26.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% 2012, AGAIN, MANY OF YOUR 04:26.400 --> 04:27.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% VIEWERS MAY REMEMBER, THE CHIEF 04:27.633 --> 04:30.366 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% JUSTICE, JOHN ROBERTS, JOINED 04:30.366 --> 04:31.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE COURT'S THEN FOUR MORE 04:31.766 --> 04:32.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% LIBERAL JUSTICES IN UPHOLDING 04:32.633 --> 04:34.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE. 04:34.633 --> 04:37.066 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% A COUPLE OF YEARS LATER, THE 04:37.066 --> 04:38.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% CONGRESS CHANGED THE MANDATE. 04:38.433 --> 04:40.166 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THEY REDUCED THE PENALTY FOR NOT 04:40.166 --> 04:41.166 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% GETTING HEALTH INSURANCE TO 04:41.166 --> 04:42.666 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ZERO. 04:42.666 --> 04:44.900 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND SO, TEXAS AND SOME OTHER 04:44.900 --> 04:46.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SO-CALLED RED STATES WENT TO 04:46.866 --> 04:48.100 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% COURT, SAID, WELL, IF THERE'S NO 04:48.100 --> 04:49.800 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% LONGER A PENALTY FOR NOT GETTING 04:49.800 --> 04:50.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% HEALTH INSURANCE, IT CAN'T BE A 04:50.633 --> 04:53.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% TAX. 04:53.866 --> 04:55.933 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND THEY SAID IF THE MANDATE'S 04:55.933 --> 04:57.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% NOT CONSTITUTIONAL, THE WHOLE 04:57.700 --> 04:58.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AFFORDABLE CARE ACT HAS TO GO 04:58.700 --> 05:00.700 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WITH IT. 05:00.700 --> 05:02.266 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND SO, THAT IS OBVIOUSLY A VERY 05:02.266 --> 05:03.333 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% CONSEQUENTIAL CASE THAT IS GOING 05:03.333 --> 05:04.300 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% TO BE ARGUED ON NOVEMBER 10 AT 05:04.300 --> 05:05.933 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE SUPREME COURT. 05:05.933 --> 05:07.100 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> Sreenivasan: ONE THING A LOT 05:07.100 --> 05:09.800 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% OF PEOPLE ARE CURIOUS ABOUT IS 05:09.800 --> 05:12.533 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHAT IF THE ELECTION, SIMILAR TO 05:12.533 --> 05:13.800 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% 2000, ENDS UP IN FRONT OF THE 05:13.800 --> 05:16.133 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SUPREME COURT? 05:16.133 --> 05:19.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WOULD SHE PLAY A ROLE IN THAT? 05:19.733 --> 05:20.900 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> I THINK THAT IS DEFINITELY A 05:20.900 --> 05:22.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% QUESTION THAT WE ARE GOING TO 05:22.866 --> 05:24.733 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% HEAR ASKED AT THE HEARINGS IN A 05:24.733 --> 05:26.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% VARIETY OF DIFFERENT 05:26.866 --> 05:27.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% FORMULATIONS, AND I DON'T KNOW 05:27.866 --> 05:28.833 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHAT HER ANSWER WILL BE. 05:28.833 --> 05:31.000 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% I THINK THAT SHE IS LIKELY TO 05:31.000 --> 05:32.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% PLAY A ROLE. 05:32.866 --> 05:37.300 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% AND I THINK THE PRESIDENT AND 05:37.300 --> 05:38.666 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SOME REPUBLICANS HAVE SUGGESTED 05:38.666 --> 05:39.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THAT THAT IS, IN FACT, A REASON 05:39.766 --> 05:41.033 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% WHY WE NEED A NINTH JUSTICE ON 05:41.033 --> 05:41.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE SUPREME COURT IN ADVANCE OF 05:41.866 --> 05:43.400 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THE ELECTIONS. 05:43.400 --> 05:45.533 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% CERTAINLY ANY LITIGATION ARISING 05:45.533 --> 05:47.633 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% OUT OF THE ELECTIONS ISN'T GOING 05:47.633 --> 05:50.533 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% TO ARRIVE ON THE SUPREME COURT 05:50.533 --> 05:52.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% ON, YOU KNOW, NOVEMBER 4, RIGHT. 05:52.200 --> 05:53.466 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% IT WOULD TAKE A WHILE TO BUBBLE 05:53.466 --> 05:54.433 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% UP TO THE SUPREME COURT. 05:54.433 --> 05:55.966 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% BUT, SORT OF THE BROADER 05:55.966 --> 05:57.233 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% QUESTION I THINK SHE IS LIKELY 05:57.233 --> 05:58.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% TO PLAY A ROLE. 05:58.766 --> 05:59.500 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> Sreenivasan: AMY HOWE, "THE 05:59.500 --> 06:00.333 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% SCOTUS BLOG." 06:00.333 --> 06:01.200 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% THANKS SO MUCH. 06:01.200 --> 06:01.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% >> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.