WEBVTT 00:00.934 --> 00:03.169 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% This piano was built in 1828. 00:04.404 --> 00:06.973 align:left position:30% line:83% size:60% It has not been restored or rebuilt. 00:06.973 --> 00:08.208 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% So it's very different from the pianos that we're accustomed to today. 00:09.809 --> 00:12.879 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% For one thing, there aren't 88 keys on this piano. 00:12.879 --> 00:18.218 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% There's several left off here in the base, three and seven left off in the treble. 00:18.218 --> 00:21.388 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% So there are 78 keys in the piano and the central differences on the inside. 00:21.388 --> 00:23.089 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% There's no cast iron play. 00:24.991 --> 00:28.495 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% The piano is considerably less resonant, more challenging to sustain sounds. 00:28.495 --> 00:31.664 align:left position:40% line:83% size:50% Right. It looks very different inside. 00:31.664 --> 00:34.934 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% And so this would have been like new for the time. Yes. 00:34.934 --> 00:37.003 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% This is cutting edge technology. 00:37.003 --> 00:38.538 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% For the Schumann's in a sense. 00:39.973 --> 00:43.009 align:left position:20% line:83% size:70% Another feature of it I noticed as I tried it was 00:43.009 --> 00:45.545 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% is that a damper pedal here is actually quite noisy. 00:46.446 --> 00:48.815 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% So it's a challenge to play it 00:48.815 --> 00:52.485 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% and even be more of a challenge to play with this piano. 00:52.485 --> 00:53.453 align:left position:30% line:83% size:60% This is the A. Tell me what you think of it. 00:55.822 --> 00:56.823 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% Wow. It's low. 00:56.823 --> 00:57.323 align:left position:40% line:89% size:50% So low. 00:59.926 --> 01:01.327 align:left position:20% line:89% size:70% It's almost painful. 01:02.562 --> 01:02.762 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% Yeah. Yes. 01:03.463 --> 01:04.998 align:left position:20% line:89% size:70% Would it be okay if I, 01:04.998 --> 01:06.132 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% if I try to play a few notes and it's sure. Yeah. 01:07.133 --> 01:10.603 align:left position:20% line:89% size:70% I'm so interested in... 01:10.603 --> 01:30.323 align:left position:40% line:89% size:50% ♪♪ 01:32.192 --> 01:33.493 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% The sound is so beautiful, but it's really, really hard to play, 01:34.994 --> 01:37.931 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% I have to admit. Valentino, you are a really impressive 01:37.931 --> 01:40.300 align:left position:20% line:89% size:70% pianist for a cellist. 01:43.002 --> 01:46.773 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% It would be really nice if we could all play Schumann's Quintet 01:46.773 --> 01:49.242 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% because we could hear it the way Schumann heard it when he wrote it. Yes. 01:50.543 --> 01:54.914 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% Let's try! It'll be challenging. 01:54.914 --> 03:29.709 align:left position:40% line:89% size:50% ♪♪