WEBVTT 00:02.666 --> 00:07.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:42.5% APPRECIATE IT IT. 00:04.500 --> 00:09.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:32.5% >> THANK YOU. 00:05.066 --> 00:09.733 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% TO CAROL MARIN AND A CLOSER LOOK 00:07.066 --> 00:11.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% AT THE CHARGES AGAINST DENNIS 00:09.300 --> 00:12.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:20% HASTERT. 00:09.733 --> 00:14.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% >> Reporter: PHIL, THANK YOU. 00:11.166 --> 00:19.200 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% THURSDAY MORNING THE FORMER 00:12.566 --> 00:22.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% SPEAKER OF THE UNITED STATES 00:14.833 --> 00:23.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% HOUSE, DENNIS HASTERT WILL WALK 00:19.200 --> 00:26.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% TO THE DIRKSEN FEDERAL BUILDING 00:22.133 --> 00:28.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% TO FACE FELONY CHARGES. 00:23.833 --> 00:31.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% THIS CASE ALLEGEDLY INVOLVES THE 00:26.266 --> 00:34.733 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% PAYMENT OF HUSH MONEY FOR SEXUAL 00:28.800 --> 00:36.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% MISCONDUCT THAT REPORTEDLY 00:31.166 --> 00:36.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% OCCURRED THAT OR THE REPORTEDLY 00:34.733 --> 00:39.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% HAPPENED LONG BEFORE HE ENTERED 00:36.100 --> 00:41.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:35% PUBLIC OFFICE. 00:36.700 --> 00:42.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% TWO COUNTS INVOLVE BANK FRAUD 00:39.233 --> 00:44.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% AND LYING TO THE FBI AND EFFORTS 00:41.166 --> 00:45.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% TO CONCEAL PAYMENTINGS. 00:42.900 --> 00:48.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% QUESTIONS FAR OUTNUMBER ANY 00:44.933 --> 00:49.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% ANSWERS OFFERED IN THE 00:45.833 --> 00:51.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% INDICTMENT AND HASTERT HAS SAID 00:48.466 --> 00:53.533 align:start position:10% line:74% size:37.5% NOTHING SO FAR. 00:49.266 --> 00:54.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% WE TURN FOR A CLOSER TO LOOK TO 00:51.666 --> 00:56.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% PEOPLE WHO KNOW A LOT ABOUT THE 00:53.533 --> 00:58.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:37.5% FEDERAL SYSTEM. 00:54.100 --> 01:01.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% FORMER ASSISTANTS U.S. ATTORNEY, 00:56.366 --> 01:03.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% WHO IS THE PROSECUTOR IN THE 00:58.666 --> 01:05.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% CASE AGAINST GEORGE RYAN AND NEW 01:01.066 --> 01:07.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% PARTNER IN A LAW FIRM. 01:03.833 --> 01:10.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% AND MATTHEW CROWL A FORMER U.S. 01:05.866 --> 01:13.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% ASSISTANTS ATTORNEY, SERVED AS 01:07.433 --> 01:16.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% FIRST DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF 01:10.400 --> 01:18.200 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% UNDER RICHARD M.DALEY. 01:13.633 --> 01:20.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% WELCOME TO "CHICAGO TONIGHT". 01:16.400 --> 01:22.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% YOU HAVE READ INDICTMENTS MORE 01:18.200 --> 01:26.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% THAN ANYONE ELSE IN THIS ROOM. 01:20.466 --> 01:32.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% DOES THIS INDICTMENT LOOK TO YOU 01:22.500 --> 01:34.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% AS IF A DEAL HAS BEEN STRUCK, 01:26.000 --> 01:35.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BECAUSE IT IS ONLY TWO COUNTS? 01:32.900 --> 01:36.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% >> THAT IS NOT THE WAY I READ 01:34.400 --> 01:37.600 align:start position:10% line:74% size:7.5% IT. 01:35.166 --> 01:37.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SOME 01:36.566 --> 01:39.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% DISCUSSIONS BUT NOT A DEAL IN 01:37.600 --> 01:41.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:15% PLACE. 01:37.966 --> 01:44.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% IF YOU ARE GOING TO CUT A DEAL 01:39.433 --> 01:45.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% ON THIS, YOU WOULD DO IT BEFORE 01:41.966 --> 01:46.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% INDICTMENT, AND YOU DO WHAT IS 01:44.666 --> 01:49.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% CALLED, SIGNALING AN AGREEMENT 01:45.933 --> 01:51.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:22.5% IN PLACE. 01:46.466 --> 01:53.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% I DON'T READ IT AS AN INDICTMENT 01:49.366 --> 01:55.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% WHERE THINGS HAVE BEEN DECIDED. 01:51.500 --> 01:58.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% >> AND MATTHEW CROWL, HASTERT IS 01:53.833 --> 02:01.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:40% SUCH A BIG NAME. 01:55.033 --> 02:04.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BUT NO PRESS CONFERENCE AT THE 01:58.833 --> 02:06.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% DIRKSEN FEDERAL BUILDING. 02:01.133 --> 02:08.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% OFTEN THIS IS WHERE THE U.S. 02:04.666 --> 02:09.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% ATTORNEY STANDS UP WITH THE 02:06.800 --> 02:11.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% GOVERNMENT ON ONE SIDE AND 02:08.900 --> 02:13.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:30% ANNOUNCE IT. 02:09.766 --> 02:13.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% WHY DO YOU SUPPOSE NOT? 02:11.133 --> 02:15.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% >> IT IS A PLAIN VANILLA 02:13.500 --> 02:17.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:27.5% INDICTMENT. 02:13.933 --> 02:19.533 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% TWO CRIMES, THAT ALTHOUGH THEY 02:15.866 --> 02:22.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% RELATE TO A VERY HIGH PROFILE 02:17.966 --> 02:25.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% PUBLIC FIGURE, PROBABLY CAME TO 02:19.533 --> 02:28.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% THE FBI, AND THEY DON'T RELATE 02:22.933 --> 02:30.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% TO HIS WORK IN POLITICAL OFFICE. 02:25.433 --> 02:32.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% AND IT'S SAD ALL AROUND. 02:28.800 --> 02:34.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% AND FRANKLY THE INDICTMENT 02:30.466 --> 02:35.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% DOESN'T SAY A WHOLE LONG. 02:32.933 --> 02:37.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% STRUCTURING IS A VERY SIMPLE 02:34.666 --> 02:38.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% CRIME, IT DOESN'T REQUIRE AT 02:35.666 --> 02:39.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% THAT TIME MONEY COME FROM AN 02:37.500 --> 02:41.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:37.5% ILLEGAL SOURCE. 02:38.166 --> 02:43.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% AND LYING TO THE FBI... 02:39.766 --> 02:46.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% >> STRUCTURING, IF I WANT TO GO 02:41.766 --> 02:50.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% TO MY BANK AND PULL OUT MORE 02:43.833 --> 02:52.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% THAN $10,000, AND GIVE TO IT 02:46.766 --> 02:54.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% PATRICK OFF HERE, IS THAT A 02:50.000 --> 02:56.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% PROBLEM IF I TRY TO DO IT IN 02:52.000 --> 02:58.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% SMALLER INCREMENTS INSTEAD? 02:54.266 --> 02:59.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% >> IT IS A CRIME IF YOU DO IT IN 02:56.633 --> 03:02.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% SMALLER INCREMENTS, SO THAT THE 02:58.633 --> 03:03.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:52.5% BANK WON'T REPORT IT. 02:59.933 --> 03:05.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% IF YOU DID IT ONCE, THE FEDS 03:02.100 --> 03:07.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% WOULDN'T PROSECUTE YOU. 03:03.100 --> 03:10.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BUT HERE, A HARD INDICTMENT TO 03:05.666 --> 03:14.733 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% DEFEND BECAUSE HE DID IT FIVE L 03:07.700 --> 03:15.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% FIFTEEN TIMES AND WAS TOLD IF HE 03:10.000 --> 03:18.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% TOOK OUT $50,000, AND BY THE WAY 03:14.733 --> 03:21.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% WE HAVE TO REPORT THIS. 03:15.766 --> 03:24.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% AND HE STARTED TO DO IT, ANOTHER 03:18.666 --> 03:25.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% HUNDRED TIMES LESS THAN $10,000. 03:21.700 --> 03:26.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% IT IS VERY CLEAR WHAT THE INTENT 03:24.133 --> 03:28.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% IS IF THE ALLEGATIONS IS TRUE. 03:25.766 --> 03:30.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:45% THAT IS THE CRIME. 03:26.766 --> 03:31.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% >> GOOD IDEA, PATRICK COLLINS 03:28.766 --> 03:34.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% THAT HE TALKED TO THE FBI BY 03:30.766 --> 03:37.733 align:start position:10% line:74% size:20% HIMSELF? 03:31.833 --> 03:39.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% >> IT IS IF YOU TELL THE TRUTH. 03:34.000 --> 03:42.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% WHAT IS ODD, SO MANY ODDITIES 03:37.733 --> 03:43.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% BUT IF HE TALKSES TO THE 03:39.700 --> 03:45.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% GOVERNMENT AND SAID I HAD THIS 03:42.133 --> 03:47.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% MISCONDUCT SITUATION AND I WILL 03:43.566 --> 03:50.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% PAY THIS INDIVIDUAL A TO 03:45.900 --> 03:51.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% COMPENSATE HIM OR HER NOR 03:47.933 --> 03:53.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% WRONGDOING I COMMITTED ON HIM, 03:50.266 --> 03:55.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:32.5% 30 YEARS AGO. 03:51.466 --> 03:55.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% THERE IS NO FEDERAL CRIME OR 03:53.700 --> 03:57.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% STRUCTURING IF HE WRITES A 03:55.033 --> 04:00.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:15% CHECK. 03:55.366 --> 04:03.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% THERE IS NO FEDERAL CRIME OF 03:57.166 --> 04:05.600 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% LYING, IF YOU TELL THE TRUTH. 04:00.566 --> 04:06.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% WHAT HAPPENED HERE, TWO KINDS OF 04:03.700 --> 04:09.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% COVERUP AND IN THE A CRIME OF 04:05.600 --> 04:10.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:25% SUBSTANCE. 04:06.500 --> 04:13.600 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% THAT IS NOT TO BELITTLE WHAT 04:09.100 --> 04:14.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% HAPPENED, BUT IT IS PRETTY CLEAR 04:10.566 --> 04:16.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% THERE WAS PROBABLY A STATUTE OF 04:13.600 --> 04:18.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% LIMITATIONS ISSUE AND DEFENSE 04:14.966 --> 04:20.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% COULDN'T GET THAT, AND REALLY A 04:16.166 --> 04:21.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% CRIME THAT ALMOST MR. HAS TERLT 04:18.700 --> 04:23.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% BROUGHT UPON HIMSELF BY THE WAY 04:20.700 --> 04:24.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:52.5% HE MADE THE PAYMENTS. 04:21.966 --> 04:28.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% >> WHAT ELSE DO YOU THINK IS ODD 04:23.566 --> 04:30.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:37.5% ABOUT THE CASE? 04:24.366 --> 04:33.533 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% >> IT IS ODD THAT THE CONDUCT 04:28.133 --> 04:35.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% APPEARS, HE IS A PUBLIC 04:30.133 --> 04:36.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:52.5% OFFICIAL, THE PAYMENT 04:33.533 --> 04:37.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% CONVERSATIONS DO NOT HAPPEN 04:35.266 --> 04:38.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% UNTIL AFTER HE'S A PUBLIC 04:36.866 --> 04:42.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:22.5% OFFICIAL. 04:37.233 --> 04:46.533 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% THE VALUE OF THE EXTORTION OR 04:38.933 --> 04:50.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BLACK MAIL F THAT THAT IS THAT 04:42.133 --> 04:52.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% IT WAS, WHY WOULD YOU PAY $3.5 04:46.533 --> 04:55.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% MILLION TO JOE SMITH FOR THAT. 04:50.100 --> 04:57.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% SO VERY ODD, WHY DOES HE NOT 04:52.800 --> 05:00.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% HOLD A PRESS CONFERENCE, HE IS 04:55.933 --> 05:02.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% ASKED YOU A THE QUESTIONS THAT 04:57.000 --> 05:05.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% YOU WOULD BE INTERESTED IN. 05:00.166 --> 05:07.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% INDIVIDUAL A DOES INDIVIDUAL A 05:02.833 --> 05:08.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% GET THE KEEP THE MONEY AND DOES 05:05.500 --> 05:10.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% INDIVIDUAL A NOT GET CHARGED 05:07.266 --> 05:11.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% WITH ANYTHING IN THIS? 05:08.500 --> 05:14.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% >> I THINK A CORDING TO THE 05:10.866 --> 05:16.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% ALLEGATIONS INDIVIDUAL A COULD 05:11.833 --> 05:17.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% BE CHARGED WITH EXTORTION AND HE 05:14.300 --> 05:19.533 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% MAY BE CHARGED WITH EXTORTION, 05:16.266 --> 05:21.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% AND IT COULD BE UNDER SEAL ABOUT 05:17.933 --> 05:24.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% I WAS SURPRISED BY THAT. 05:19.533 --> 05:25.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% DOESN'T GET TO KEEP THE MONEY. 05:21.633 --> 05:27.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% PROCEEDS OF A CRIME, AND THE ODD 05:24.666 --> 05:29.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% THINGS ABOUT THIS CASE IN 05:25.833 --> 05:31.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% ADDITION IS IT IS VERY STRANGE 05:27.500 --> 05:32.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% FROM THE VICTIM BECOMES THE 05:29.700 --> 05:34.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% PERPETRATOR AND PERPETRATOR 05:31.033 --> 05:35.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:47.5% BECOMES THE VICTIM. 05:32.900 --> 05:39.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% ALLEGEDLY THIS KID WAS 05:34.566 --> 05:41.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% VICTIMIZED WHEN HE WAS YOUNG, 05:35.833 --> 05:43.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% AND NOW BECOMES THE EXTORTER, 05:39.033 --> 05:44.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% AND DENNY HASTERT WAS THE 05:41.233 --> 05:46.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% PERPETRATOR AND NOW THE VICTIM. 05:43.066 --> 05:46.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE HAS TO 05:44.833 --> 05:49.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% HAVE STRUCK A DEAL WITH 05:46.400 --> 05:50.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:32.5% INDIVIDUAL A. 05:46.900 --> 05:52.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% BECAUSE THE INDICTMENT IS AT 05:49.233 --> 05:53.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% LEAST RICH ENOUGH THAT 05:50.433 --> 05:56.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% INFORMATION IS COMING FROM 05:52.066 --> 05:58.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% SOMEONE, PROBABLY THAT PERSON. 05:53.700 --> 06:01.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% >> I WOULD BE SURPRISED, I AGREE 05:56.633 --> 06:02.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% WITH MATE, THEY CUT A DEAL, 05:58.666 --> 06:04.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% COULD BE IMMUNITY AND IT IS 06:01.466 --> 06:06.333 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% CLEAR, THEY TALKED TO INDIVIDUAL 06:02.766 --> 06:10.200 align:start position:10% line:74% size:50% A AND GOT THE STORY. 06:04.166 --> 06:11.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% BUT WHETHER INDIVIDUAL A WILL BE 06:06.333 --> 06:15.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% CHARGED PARTICULARLY IF THE 06:10.200 --> 06:16.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% MISCONDUCT IS WHAT IS SPECULATED 06:11.800 --> 06:17.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% I WOULDN'T BE SURPRISED IF THEY 06:15.100 --> 06:19.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:50% CHARGED INDIVIDUAL A 06:16.933 --> 06:21.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:35% SUBSTANTIVELY. 06:17.433 --> 06:22.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% LEAKS FROM THE FEDERAL BUILDING 06:19.300 --> 06:24.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% ARE TROUBLING ABOUT... 06:21.100 --> 06:27.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% >> THAT IS INTERESTING, THE 06:22.666 --> 06:28.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% LEAKS BASICALLY CONFIRMED RIGHT 06:24.766 --> 06:29.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% AWAY THAT IT WAS A SEXUAL 06:27.500 --> 06:30.333 align:start position:10% line:74% size:40% MISCONDUCT CASE. 06:28.400 --> 06:32.200 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% SOMETHING NOT WRITTEN IN THE 06:29.633 --> 06:33.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:45% INDICTMENT ITSELF. 06:30.333 --> 06:36.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:52.5% >> THAT IS TROUBLING. 06:32.200 --> 06:38.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% THERE IS A SOURCE TO FEDERAL 06:33.933 --> 06:40.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% OFFICIALS WHICH IS VERY TROUBLE 06:36.433 --> 06:41.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% BECAUSE A LOT GOES INTO AN 06:38.900 --> 06:44.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% INDICTMENT TO STRUCTURE IT A 06:40.900 --> 06:46.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:30% CERTAIN WAY. 06:41.666 --> 06:49.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% IT HAD THE WORD MISCONDUCT AND 06:44.066 --> 06:51.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% DIDN'T SAY SEXUAL MISCONDUCT. 06:46.466 --> 06:52.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% AND FOR SOMEONE TO SAY WITHIN 24 06:49.366 --> 06:55.733 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% HOURS SO SAY IT WAS SEXUAL AND 06:51.466 --> 06:59.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% THERE WAS SECOND VICTIM, THAT IS 06:52.933 --> 07:03.600 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% NOT THE WAY IT SHOULD WORK. 06:55.733 --> 07:07.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% >> THE SON OF DENNIS HASTERT AND 06:59.166 --> 07:09.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% THE LAW FIRM, WHERE THE JUDGE, 07:03.600 --> 07:10.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% TOM DURKIN WAS A PARTNER, A GOOD 07:07.433 --> 07:13.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% IDEA FOR HIS SON IF HE CONTINUES 07:09.133 --> 07:14.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:45% TO BE REPRESENTED? 07:10.666 --> 07:15.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% >> A BAD IDEA TO REPRESENT YOUR 07:13.066 --> 07:16.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:10% DAD. 07:14.000 --> 07:17.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% VERY DIFFICULT TO HAVE A 07:15.300 --> 07:20.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT AND 07:16.766 --> 07:22.600 align:start position:10% line:74% size:22.5% DISTANCE. 07:17.266 --> 07:24.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% BUT I'M SURE THAT ETHAN HASTERT 07:20.266 --> 07:26.333 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% WOULDN'T DO IT ALONE THEY WOULD 07:22.600 --> 07:27.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BE PART OF THE PRACTICE, A BIT 07:24.566 --> 07:29.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% WHILE COLLAR PRACTICE, AND HE'S 07:26.333 --> 07:34.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% REPRESENTING HIS FATHER IT IS 07:27.300 --> 07:37.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% PART OF A TEAM, I'M SURE. 07:29.300 --> 07:38.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% >> CAN TOM DURKIN RECUSE HIMSELF 07:34.066 --> 07:40.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% AS A JUDGINGS BECAUSE HE GAVE A 07:37.033 --> 07:42.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% CONTRIBUTION YEARS AGO TO THEN 07:38.866 --> 07:44.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% CONGRESSMAN DENNIS HASTERT? 07:40.466 --> 07:44.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% >> I KNOW HE IS AN HONORABLE 07:42.966 --> 07:46.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% PERSON AND HE WILL DO THE RIGHT 07:44.266 --> 07:46.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:15% THING. 07:44.566 --> 07:48.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% I HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THE JUDGE 07:46.166 --> 07:50.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:35% WOULD BE FAIR. 07:46.966 --> 07:52.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% IF I WAS CRIMINAL DEFENDANT, 07:48.766 --> 07:54.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% SOME JUDGES IN THE BUILDING 07:50.233 --> 07:55.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% WHETHER YOU ARE A DEFENDANT OR 07:52.300 --> 07:56.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% PROSECUTOR, YOU ARE GLAD TO HAVE 07:54.033 --> 07:57.700 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% THAT DRAW BECAUSE YOU YOU KNOW 07:55.300 --> 07:58.266 align:start position:10% line:74% size:35% THEY ARE FAIR. 07:56.066 --> 08:00.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% AND I WOULD PUT THAT JUDGE IN 07:57.700 --> 08:01.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:25% THAT BOOK. 07:58.266 --> 08:04.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% WHETHER HE FEELS HE NEEDS TO DO 08:00.466 --> 08:05.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% SOMETHING, THAT IS HIS CALL. 08:01.833 --> 08:08.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% >> IS THERE A POSSIBILITY THAT 08:04.433 --> 08:09.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% DENNIS HASTERT WILL NOT, 08:05.766 --> 08:10.500 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% ASSUMING HE PLEADS GUILTY OR IS 08:08.033 --> 08:11.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% FOUND GUILTY HAVE TO DO PRISON 08:09.400 --> 08:13.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:12.5% TIME? 08:10.500 --> 08:15.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% >> THERE IS A POSSIBILITY. 08:11.633 --> 08:17.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% IF YOU LOOK FOR SENTENCING GAID 08:13.366 --> 08:18.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% LINES AND WORK THE GUIDELINES, 08:15.233 --> 08:21.333 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% IT WOULD PROBABLY BE A TWO-YEAR 08:17.466 --> 08:23.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% SENTENCE BUT A LOT OF LENIENCY 08:18.866 --> 08:25.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% THAT A JUDGE CAN GIVE IF IT 08:21.333 --> 08:25.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% DOESN'T INVOLVE CRIMINAL 08:23.366 --> 08:28.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% ACTIVITY, THE ACTUAL PAYMENT 08:25.400 --> 08:29.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:17.5% ITSELF. 08:25.966 --> 08:33.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% AND THEN THE GAID LINES ARE NOT 08:28.366 --> 08:36.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BIND ANYTHING MORE AND FEDERAL 08:29.766 --> 08:37.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% JUDGE HAS TREMENDOUS LENIENCY. 08:33.566 --> 08:39.000 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% >> IS THERE A WAY TO MAKE AN 08:36.233 --> 08:39.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% ARGUMENT, AND YOU ARE A FINE 08:37.633 --> 08:41.366 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% LAWYER SO YOU WOULD KNOW THE 08:39.000 --> 08:43.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:37.5% ANSWER TO THIS. 08:39.833 --> 08:44.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:55% SO TAKE LOOK, THERE IS 08:41.366 --> 08:46.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% MITIGATION HERE, HASTERT FELT 08:43.566 --> 08:48.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% HORRIBLE ABOUT SOMETHING THAT 08:44.800 --> 08:50.600 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% HAPPENED IN HIS PAST AND TRIED 08:46.766 --> 08:53.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:42.5% TO MAKE IT RIGHT. 08:48.233 --> 08:55.733 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% HE WAS PANICKED ABOUT IT BECAUSE 08:50.600 --> 08:57.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% OF WHAT KIND OF STAIN IT COULD 08:53.233 --> 09:00.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% PUT ON HIM BUT WASN'T DOING 08:55.733 --> 09:01.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% ANYTHING PURPOSELY ILLEGAL. 08:57.900 --> 09:02.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% JUST TRYING TO DO IT QUIETLY. 09:00.133 --> 09:03.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% COULD YOU MAKE THAT ARGUMENT IN 09:01.900 --> 09:05.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:15% COURT? 09:02.233 --> 09:07.200 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% >> I THAT I LAWYER WILL MAKE 09:03.800 --> 09:09.566 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% SOME OF THAT ARGUMENT AND IF 09:05.300 --> 09:11.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% THERE IS A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT 09:07.200 --> 09:15.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% WHERE MR. HASTERT ACKNOWLEDGES 09:09.566 --> 09:17.100 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% CERTAIN WRONGDOING TO SAY IT HAD 09:11.166 --> 09:19.600 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS ROLE AS A 09:15.766 --> 09:21.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:37.5% PUBLIC SERVANT. 09:17.100 --> 09:21.766 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% FOR 30 YEARS A GREAT PUBLIC 09:19.600 --> 09:23.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:60% SERVANT BUT BRACKETED BY 09:21.400 --> 09:25.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:22.5% MISTAKES. 09:21.766 --> 09:27.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% THE REALITY IS THAT MR. HASTERT 09:23.800 --> 09:30.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BECAUSE HE LIED AND BECAUSE HE 09:25.933 --> 09:32.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% STRUCTURED IN SUCH AN OBVIOUS 09:27.866 --> 09:36.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% WAY, I THINK A JUDGE WOULD HAVE 09:30.666 --> 09:39.200 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% TO THINK LONG AND HARD ABOUT IT. 09:32.933 --> 09:41.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BUT HE IS 73 AND THAT PLAYS IN 09:36.433 --> 09:42.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% TO THE NARRATIVE IN THE FEDERAL 09:39.200 --> 09:43.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% BUILDINGS AND MITIGATION IS 09:41.133 --> 09:46.666 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% SOMETHING HE COULD GRANT. 09:42.466 --> 09:49.333 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% IF THIS HAPPENS QUICKLY THERE IS 09:43.966 --> 09:51.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% A BETTER ARGUMENT THAN THIS. 09:46.666 --> 09:52.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% >> SOME PEOPLE THINK IT IS 09:49.333 --> 09:55.066 align:start position:10% line:74% size:72.5% IRONIC THERE IS NO STATUTE OF 09:51.133 --> 09:57.133 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% LIMITATIONS ON MURDER BUT THERE 09:52.800 --> 09:59.466 align:start position:10% line:74% size:80% IS ON THE MOLESTATION OF MURDER. 09:55.066 --> 10:01.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:70% MURDER IS THE ONLY THING FOR 09:57.133 --> 10:03.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% WHICH THERE IS NO STATUTE. 09:59.466 --> 10:04.833 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% >> I BELIEVE THAT IS THE CASE. 10:01.866 --> 10:05.900 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% THERE ARE LOTS OF DIFFERENT 10:03.300 --> 10:07.800 align:start position:10% line:74% size:65% CRIMES WHEN YOU THINK WHAT 10:04.833 --> 10:08.166 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE, IF YOU 10:05.900 --> 10:09.866 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% ARE CAN PROVE IT, IT SHOULD BE 10:07.800 --> 10:11.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:20% BROUGHT. 10:08.166 --> 10:12.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% BUT THAT IS A DECISION FOR THE 10:09.866 --> 10:15.300 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% ILLINOIS LEGISLATOR TO MAKE AND 10:11.433 --> 10:18.433 align:start position:10% line:74% size:77.5% THEY HAVE OTHER THINGS ON THEIR 10:12.966 --> 10:19.633 align:start position:10% line:74% size:62.5% PLATE RATSZ THAN CHANGING 10:15.300 --> 10:20.933 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% STATUTES OF LIMITATION. 10:18.433 --> 10:23.233 align:start position:10% line:74% size:67.5% THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE ON 10:19.633 --> 10:24.966 align:start position:10% line:74% size:45% "CHICAGO TONIGHT". 10:20.933 --> 10:25.400 align:start position:10% line:74% size:75% CPS BARBARA BYRD-BENNETT CALLS 10:23.233 --> 10:28.033 align:start position:10% line:74% size:57.5% IT QUITS AMID A FEDERAL