[♪♪♪]

 

>> GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO

 

"CHICAGO TONIGHT."

 

>> THERE IS A FINDING OF NOT

 

GUILTY AS TO EVERY COUNT IN EACH

 

DEFENDANT OF CONSPIRACY,

 

OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AND

 

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

 

>> A COOK COUNTY JUDGE

 

ACQUITINGS POLICE OFFICERS OF

 

ALL CHARGES IN AN ALLEGED COVER

 

UP TO PROTECT JASON VAN DYKE IN

 

THE LAQUAN McDONALD SHOOTING.

 

>> EVERYBODY BUT THE

 

AFRICAN-AMERICANS IN THE COUNTY.

 

>> AND THE BACKLASH OF THE

 

VERDICT HAS BEGUN.

 

A LOOK AT WHAT IT MAY MEAN

 

MOVING FORWARD.

 

>> I WOULD LIKE TO SEE WHAT WE

 

ARE DOING AT O'HARE TO MAKE SURE

 

THAT O'HARE STAYS THE BEST

 

AIRPORT IN THE UNITED STATES OF

 

AMERICA.

 

>> INSIDE THE FIVE PROPOSALS TO

 

REDESIGN O'HARE'S TERMINAL 2 AS

 

PART OF THE $8.5 BILLION

 

EXPANSION PLAN.

 

COULD MARIJUANA HELP KEEP PEOPLE

 

OFF OF OPIOIDS IN LIGHT OF

 

STARTLING OVERDOSE NUMBERS?

 

AND SWAPPING THE COCKTAIL FOR A

 

MOCK TAIL IS PART OF A TREND

 

CALLED DRY JANUARY WE DRINK IN

 

THE DETAILS OF THE FAD AND

 

POTENTIAL BENEFITS.

 

>> THESE ARE ARE THE ANCIENT

 

STORYTELLING AND SPINS IN A

 

MODERN WAY.

 

>> BRENDAN COYLE TALKING ABOUT

 

HIS NEW SHOW AT THE GOODMAN

 

THEATER AND THE EXPERIENCE OF

 

PLAYING A KEY ROLE IN DOWNTON

 

ABBEY.

 

AND HEATHER HENSON TALKS ABOUT

 

THE PUPPET THEATER FESTIVAL AND

 

GROWING UP AS THE DAUGHTER OF

 

JIM HENSON.

 

ALL THAT AND MORE NEXT ON

 

"CHICAGO TONIGHT."

 

[♪♪♪]

 

>> THANK YOU FOR JOINING US AND

 

THANKS FOR READING THAT I'M

 

PARIS SCHUTZ.

 

FIRST EXPLORING TODAY'S VERDICT

 

IN THE POLICE CONSPIRACY TRIAL.

 

BRANDIS BEGINS OUR COVERAGE.

 

>> AND PARIS, COOK COUNTY JUDGE

 

DOMENICA STEPHENSON TODAY

 

ACQUITTED THREE POLICE OFFICERS

 

OF CONSPIRING TO COVER UP THE

 

CONTROVERSIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

 

SURROUNDING THE FATAL SHOOTING

 

OF TEENAGER LAQUAN McDONALD IN

 

2014.

 

THE TRIAL SHONE A BRIGHT LIGHT

 

ON A CODE OF SILENCE THAT

 

OPERATES WITHIN THE POLICE

 

DEPARTMENT AND THEY SAY IT

 

PREVENTS OFFICERS GILLFY OF

 

WRONGDOING FROM BEING HELD

 

ACCOUNTABLE.

 

MATT MASTERSON JOINS US NOW.

 

WHAT HAPPENED IN COURT AND HOW

 

DID THE JUDGE GO ABOUT MAKING

 

HER FINDINGS?

 

>> THE JUDGE SPOKE FOR AN HOUR

 

AND MADE IT CLEAR EARLY ON THAT

 

THE VERDICT WAS NOT GOING TO GO

 

AGAINST THESE MEN.

 

DOMENICA STEPHENSON WALKED

 

THROUGH THE PROSECUTOR'S CASE

 

GOING THROUGH THE BACKGROUND

 

HERE AND SHE CONTINUALLY POINTED

 

OUT HOW THE PROSECUTORS FAILED

 

TO PROVE THEIR CASE.

 

SHE DISMISSED DASH-CAM VIDEO

 

EVIDENCE THAT SHOWED THE

 

SHOOTING SAYING IT DID NOT

 

MATCHUP WITH WHAT JASON VAN DYKE

 

THE OFFICER WHO SHOT LAQUAN

 

McDONALD AND JOSEPH WALSH HIS

 

PARTNER CHARGED WERE SEEING

 

DURING THE SHOOTING.

 

AND SHE DISMISSED THE TESTIMONY

 

OF SOME OF THE STATE'S WITNESSES

 

INCLUDING DOROTHY DORA TO BE TAD

 

TESTIFIED THAT DAVID MARCH THE

 

LEAD DETECTIVE ALSO A DEFENDANT

 

HAD FABRICATED A STATEMENT AND

 

ATTRIBUTED IT TO HER IN THE

 

OFFICIAL REPORT.

 

THE JUDGE DID NOT FIND HER TO BE

 

A CREDIBLE WITNESS CITING

 

CONFLICTING TESTIMONY THAT

 

FONTAINE HAD GIVEN IN THE PAST.

 

SHE SAYS IT CAME DOWN TO WHETHER

 

THESE MEN LIED IN OFFICIAL

 

REPORTS IN AN EFFORT TO COVER

 

FOR JASON VAN DYKE AND MAKE SURE

 

HE WAS NOT GOING TO FACE A

 

CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.

 

AND EVERY ATTORNEY I HAVE SPOKEN

 

TO TALKS ABOUT HOW DIFFICULT A

 

CASE OF CONSPIRACY IS TO PROVE.

 

AND JUDGE DOMENICA STEPHENSON'S

 

MADE IT CLEAR THAT SHE WAS NOT

 

BUYING THE PROSECUTOR'S CASE.

 

>> AND AFTER THE JUDGE'S

 

VERDICT, THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY

 

AND PATRICIA HOLMES SHARED THEIR

 

REACTION.

 

>> SHE HEARD EVERY WORD OF THE

 

TESTIMONY IN THIS TRIAL AND

 

CONCLUDED AS WE DID A YEAR

 

BEFORE THAT THERE NEVER WAS A

 

CASE HERE.

 

DESPITE ALL OF THE INTEREST THAT

 

ALL YOU HAVE, THERE NEVER EVER

 

WAS A CASE.

 

>> WE, OF COURSE, DISAGREE WITH

 

THE RULING.

 

BUT WE RESPECT THE RULING.

 

IT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT

 

OF INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE A TRIAL

 

BY JUDGE OR A TRIAL BY JURY.

 

WE DO HOPE THAT THIS HAS BEEN A

 

CRACK IN THE WALL OF THE CODE OF

 

SILENCE.

 

AND THAT OTHERS WILL THINK TWICE

 

ABOUT ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THAT

 

MIGHT LAND THEM IN AN

 

INVESTIGATION SUCH AS THIS.

 

>> AND MATT, WHAT WAS THE

 

REACTION INSIDE THE COURTROOM

 

AFTER THE VERDICT WAS ANNOUNCED?

 

>> DURING THE HEARING THE MEN

 

WERE STRAIGHT-FACED AND SOMBER.

 

DAVID MARCH ONE OF THE

 

DEFENDANTS WAS CRACKING JOKES

 

BUT THE REST WERE STONE FACED

 

AND THAT CHANGED ONCE THE JUDGE

 

MADE HER RULING.

 

THERE WERE SMILES AND HANDSHAKES

 

AMONG THE DEFENDANTS AND

 

ATTORNEYS AND CLAPPING IN THE

 

COURTROOM.

 

AND PLENTY OF POLICE SUPPORTERS

 

THERE WITH THEM AND DURING THE

 

TRIAL YOU COULD HEAR SOME OF THE

 

PROSECUTORS REALIZE HOW THE CASE

 

WAS GOING TO GO.

 

I WAS NEXT TO THE TABLE AND YOU

 

COULD HEAR THE SIGHS AS THE

 

JUDGE POKED HOLES IN THEIR CASE

 

AND SIDED WITH THE DEFENSE.

 

AND SOME WERE EXPRESSING A FEAR

 

THAT THE VERDICT COMING ONE DAY

 

BEFORE JASON VAN DYKE IS

 

SENTENCED COULD HAVE AN IMPACT

 

ON WHAT SENTENCE HE DOES

 

RECEIVE.

 

>> AND ACTIVISTS INCLUDING

 

LAQUAN McDONALD'S UNCLE SAID

 

THE VERDICT REENFORCES A CODE OF

 

SILENCE WITHIN THE POLICE

 

DEPARTMENT.

 

>> IT SOLIDIFIES IT AND IT

 

BOLSTERS IT AND IT KEEPS IT

 

INTACT AND IN PLAY.

 

I DON'T THINK WE NEED A CODE OF

 

SILENCE TO HAVE A CIVILIZED

 

JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE COUNTRY OF

 

AMERICA.

 

>> THIS JUDGE TOLD US OUR LYING

 

EYES DID NOT SEE WHAT WE SAW.

 

THAT IS AN INSULT TO THE

 

INTELLIGENCE OF OUR COMMUNITY.

 

WE WANT JUSTICE FOR LAQUAN

 

McDONALD.

 

GO VOTE.

 

TURN THIS TRAGIC INCIDENT INTO

 

POLITICAL POWER.

 

THAT'S WHAT WE IMMEDIATE TO DO.

 

I'M NOT SAYING TAKE TO THE

 

STREETS.

 

IT'S TIME FOR US TO TAKE TO THE

 

POLLS.

 

>> AND THE FROM TERNAL ORDER OF

 

POLICE HAVE BEEN BEHIND THE

 

OFFICERS HOW DID THEY RECEIVE

 

THE VERDICT?

 

>> THEY WERE PLEASED WITH THE

 

RESULT OF THIS.

 

FOP REPRESENTATIVES HAVE BEEN IN

 

THE COURT THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL

 

AND THROUGH JASON VAN DYKE'S

 

TRIAL AND THEY SAW IT BEING

 

BASELESS AND THERE WAS UNDUE

 

PRESSURE PUT ON FOR A CONVICTION

 

BASED ON MEDIA REPORTS AND

 

PRESSURE THAT WENT ON WITH THE

 

CASE.

 

BUT WITH THE ACQUITTAL THE UNION

 

BELIEVES THE CASE COULD HAVE A

 

CHILLING EFFECT ON THE OFFICERS

 

IN THE STREET AFTER SEEING THE

 

MEN WHAT THEY SAID WAS BY THE

 

BOOK INVESTIGATION FOLLOWING THE

 

SHOOTING OF LAQUAN McDONALD

 

THEY WERE BROUGHT ON CHARGES

 

EVEN THOUGH THEY DID NOTHING

 

WRONG.

 

>> AND KEVIN GRAHAM SAYS THE

 

TRIAL SHOULD NEVER HAVE TAKEN

 

PLACE.

 

>> THESE THREE OFFICERS SPENT

 

THEIR CAREERS SERVING THE

 

CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO.

 

FOR THAT WE HAVE SEEN THEIR

 

NAMES DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD ON

 

A BASELESS CRIMINAL TRUMPED UP

 

CASE BY THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR,

 

PATRICIA HOLMES.

 

THERE WAS NO CONSPIRACY AND

 

THERE WAS NO CODE OF SILENCE.

 

>> AND ADDITIONALLY OFFICER

 

JOSEPH WALSH DID HAVE A FEW

 

WORDS TO SAY TO THE MEDIA WHEN

 

ASKED ABOUT THE IMPACT OF THE

 

TRIAL.

 

>> HEART WRENCHING WERE

 

HEARTBREAKING FOR MY FAMILY.

 

A YEAR-AND-A-HALF.

 

>> WHAT HAS BEEN THE MOST

 

DIFFICULT PART?

 

>> I HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO SAY.

 

>> AND MATT S. THERE ANYTHING

 

FURTHER THAT CAN COME FROM THIS

 

CASE?

 

>> NO, THE MEN HAVE BEEN

 

ACQUITTED SO THERE WILL NOT BE

 

AN APPEAL AND THEY CANNOT BE

 

RETRIED.

 

MARCH AND WALSH LEFT THE FORCE.

 

AND THOMAS GAFFNEY, THE OTHER

 

DEFENDANT, HE WAS REPORTEDLY

 

REINSTATED TODAY HE HAD BEEN

 

SUSPENDED WHILE THE CASE WAS

 

ONGOING.

 

>> MATT, THANK YOU AND WE KNOW

 

YOU WILL BE BACK IN COURT FOR

 

TOMORROW'S STEPSING OF FORMER

 

OFFICER JASON VAN DYKE FOR

 

SECOND DEGREE MURDER IN THE

 

DEATH OF LAQUAN McDONALD.

 

YOU CAN FOLLOW MATT'S COVERAGE

 

ON OUR WEBSITE AND WATCH THE

 

SENTENCING HEARING STARTING AT

 

9:00 A.M.

 

BACK TO PARIS FOR MORE ON

 

TODAY'S VERDICT AND THE

 

POTENTIAL IMPACT ON CHICAGO

 

POLICE.

 

>> WHAT IMPACT, IF ANY, WILL

 

TODAY'S VERDICT HAVE ON REFORM

 

AT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND

 

ENDING WITH SOME SEE AS A CODE

 

OF SILENCE?

 

THE ANSWER TO THOSE QUESTIONS

 

REMAIN UP IN THE AIR AND GIVEN

 

THE RULING WHAT IS THE STATUS OF

 

EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE

 

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLICE AND

 

THE COMMUNITIES THEY SERVE?

 

JOINING US TO SHARE THEIR

 

PERSPECTIVES ARE SHARON SHARON Y

 

CRAIG FUTTERMAN, A CLINICAL LAW

 

PROFESSOR AND POLICING EXPERT AT

 

THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW

 

SCHOOL, GAL PISSETZKY OF THE AND

 

PETER KOCONIS A RETIRED CHICAGO

 

POLICE SERGEANT WELCOME ALL OF

 

YOU.

 

FIRST, SHARON FAIRLEY DID THE

 

JUDGE REACH THE CORRECT VERDICT?

 

>> I WAS NOT AT THE TRIAL AND I

 

WAS NOT THERE FOR THE

 

PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE I WILL

 

NOT JUDGE HER RULING.

 

BUT I THINK WE CAN TAKE AWAY

 

FROM THIS IS THESE CASES ARE

 

REALLY DIFFICULT TO BRING AND

 

CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS OF POLICE

 

OFFICERS ARE RARE.

 

CHICAGO IS NOT UNUSUAL FROM THAT

 

VANTAGE POINT.

 

BUT THE KEY THING IS WE NEED TO

 

MAKE SURE THAT THE SYSTEM WE

 

HAVE IN PLACE CAN PREVENT THIS

 

FROM HAPPENING IN THE FUTURE AND

 

THAT IS WHERE OUR FOCUS SHOULD

 

BE FROM THIS POINT ON IS LOOKING

 

TO THE DEPARTMENT WHAT CHANGES

 

ARE WE MAKING TO MAKE SURE WE

 

HAVE SOME SYSTEMIC PREVENTIONS

 

IN PLACE TO MAKE SURE THIS

 

CANNOT HAPPEN AGAIN.

 

>> CRAIG FUTTERMAN YOU HAVE BEEN

 

INVOLVED IN THE CASE FROM THE

 

BEGINNING WERE YOU SURPRISED

 

FROM THE VERDICT?

 

>> SADLY I WAS NOT SURPRISED.

 

BUT WHAT I WAS SURPRISED BY HOW

 

PAINFUL IT WAS TO ACTUALLY

 

LISTEN TO THE JUDGE GIVE THAT

 

VERDICT.

 

BECAUSE WHAT I WOUND UP HEARING

 

FROM THE JUDGE AND THIS WILL NOT

 

MAKE ME POPULAR AMONG JUDGES OR

 

LAWYERS WAS WHAT SOUNDED LIKE

 

FROM A JUDGE, A FULL THROATED

 

DEFENSE, THE FULL THROATED

 

DEFENSE OF NOT ONLY THE COVER UP

 

BUT ACTUALLY OF THE MURDER OF

 

LAQUAN McDONALD.

 

IT SOUNDED LIKE I WAS LISTENING

 

TO THE DEFENSE ATTORNEY THERE.

 

THIS WAS AN HISTORIC CASE AND AN

 

HISTORIC PROSECUTION.

 

AND ONE OF THE REASONS IT

 

HAPPENED IS PEOPLE STOOD UP AND

 

PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY FORCED

 

THE RELEASE OF THIS VIDEO.

 

AND AS SOME OF THE COMMENTS THAT

 

I HEARD, IT WAS AS THOUGH

 

EVERYTHING THAT WE'VE ALL SEEN

 

WITH OUR OWN EYES WAS NOT TRUE.

 

THIS IN MY VIEW IS A REAL

 

TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE TODAY AND

 

WHEN THERE WAS AN HISTORIC

 

OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A REAL DENT

 

IN THE CODE OF SILENCE SO THAT

 

OFFICERS WILL THINK TWICE LIKE

 

IS THIS REALLY WORTH IT?

 

IS IT REALLY WORTH IT TO COVER

 

UP FOR A FELLOW OFFICER WHEN

 

IT'S MY JOB AND IT COULD BE MY

 

FREEDOM ON THE LINE.

 

>> CLEARLY THE JUDGE RULED THERE

 

WAS NO COVER UP.

 

GAL PISSETZKY SHE SAYS TWO

 

PEOPLE WITH TWO DIFFERENT

 

VANTAGE POINTS CAN DESCRIBE THE

 

SAME EVENT DIFFERENTLY AND NOT

 

BE LYING.

 

IS IT BELIEVABLE THAT THE

 

OFFICERS SAW A DIFFERENT LAQUAN

 

McDONALD THAN WE SAW ON THE

 

DASH-CAM VIDEO BECAUSE OF THEIR

 

WHERE THEY WERE SITUATED?

 

>> ABSOLUTELY.

 

WHEN YOU ARE AT THE SCENE OF A

 

CRIME OR THE SCENE WHEN YOU

 

WATCH SOMETHING, TWO PEOPLE SEE

 

IT FROM TWO DIFFERENT VANTAGE

 

POINTS AND YOU HAVE THE CAMERA,

 

TOO, THAT WAS PLAYED OVER AND

 

OVER DURING THE VAN DYKE CASE

 

BUT IT WAS NOT THE VANTAGE POINT

 

THAT VAN DYKE SAW THINGS

 

HAPPENING EITHER.

 

I THINK THE CAMERA IS A LITTLE

 

MISLEADING IN THE WAY THAT THE

 

CAMERA WAS PORTRAYED IN THE VAN

 

DYKE CASE IS DIFFERENT THAN HOW

 

IT WAS IN THIS CASE.

 

AND YOU HAVE EYEWITNESSES THAT

 

SAW THINGS FROM A DIFFERENT

 

PERSPECTIVE.

 

FOR EXAMPLE, THE EYEWITNESS THAT

 

THE JUDGE DOMENICA STEPHENSON

 

DISCREDITED IN A WAY HE WAS

 

SITTING TWO CARS AWAY AND HE WAS

 

BEING TOLD TO TURN AROUND WASN'T

 

HAVING ANY INTERACTION WITH THE

 

OFFICERS.

 

AND THE IMPORTANT THING TO

 

REMEMBER IT WAS A CONSPIRACY

 

CASE WHERE THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY

 

AGREEMENTS OR EVIDENCE THAT

 

THESE OFFICERS ACTUALLY AGREED

 

TO COMMIT A CRIME.

 

>> PETER KOCONIS, HOW MUCH WOULD

 

A VERDICT LIKE THIS IMPACT

 

MORALE IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT?

 

>> I THINK THE VERDICT IT WAS

 

RIGHT AND JUST VERDICT BECAUSE

 

THE JUDGE FOLLOWED THE LAW AND

 

FOLLOWED THE FACTS AND FOLLOWED

 

THE EVIDENCE.

 

AND TO SAY ANYTHING LESS IT

 

WOULD BE TERRIBLY WRONG.

 

YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE POLICE AND

 

THE BAD GUYS EVERYBODY HAS TO BE

 

TREATED FAIRLY.

 

AND YOU CAN'T TURN AROUND AND

 

SAY THAT THIS JUDGE MADE A

 

MISTAKE HERE OR THE JUDGE MADE A

 

MISTAKE THERE.

 

I THOUGHT SHE PRESENTED THE

 

DEFENSE FOR --

 

A VERDICT ON WHAT THESE OFFICERS

 

DID.

 

AND SHE WENT PAGE BY PAGE,

 

REPORT BY REPORT, THE GPR'S OF

 

THE DETECTIVES AND THE REPORTS

 

OF THE POLICE OFFICERS, AND

 

Mr. FUTTERMAN IS FRIENDS WITH

 

JAMIE CALVIN.

 

>> THE JOURNALIST WHO BROKE THIS

 

STORY.

 

>> MY PROBLEM THERE IS Mr.

 

CALVIN WAS GIVEN INFORMATION

 

REGARDING THIS CASE FROM

 

PRECKWINKLE WHEN THE JUDGE PUT A

 

SEAL ON THE CASE.

 

SO WHY IS HE SITTING THERE

 

GETTING INFORMATION THAT NOBODY

 

ELSE NO LAWYERS NO CIVILIANS,

 

THE PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY,

 

NONE OF THEM GOT ANY OF THAT

 

INFORMATION.

 

BUT PRECKWINKLE GAVE IT TO HER

 

FRIEND Mr. CALVIN.

 

>> SHE HAS BEEN FACING

 

QUESTIONS.

 

AND CRAIG FUTTERMAN I WANT TO

 

RETURN TO WHAT YOU SAID, THE

 

JUDGE DISAGREED WITH THE

 

CONCLUSIONS THAT THE JURY IN THE

 

VAN DYKE TRIAL CAME TO.

 

COULD THIS RULING AFFECT THAT

 

SENTENCING TOMORROW?

 

>> I DON'T THINK SO.

 

I THINK THE JUDGE GAUGHAN IS

 

GOING TO DO WHAT HE THINKS IS

 

FAIR AND JUST AND RIGHT.

 

AND I DON'T THINK HE WILL BE

 

IMPACTED BY WHAT HAPPENED TODAY.

 

I AM NOT MAKING PREDICTIONS BUT

 

I CAN SAY THAT JUDGE GAUGHAN IS

 

GOING TO TRY TO ARRIVE AT A

 

SENTENCE THAT HE BELIEVES, I MAY

 

NOT AGREE WITH IT, YOU MAY NOT

 

AGREE WITH IT, BUT I THINK HE IS

 

GOING TO TRY TO FIND A SENTENCE

 

THAT HE THINKS IS RIGHT.

 

>> SHARON FAIRLEY COULD A

 

VERDICT LIKE THIS IMPACT THE

 

APPEAL OF JASON VAN DYKE?

 

>> I DON'T REALLY THINK SO.

 

I THINK THEY ARE SEPARATE

 

MATTERS.

 

SO THIS IS REALLY A DIFFERENT

 

QUESTION.

 

THIS CONSPIRACY CASE RATHER THAN

 

THE MURDER CASE.

 

I DON'T THINK SO THAT IS WHY I'M

 

FOCUSED ON WHAT THE SYSTEM, WHAT

 

WE CAN DO TO MAKE SURE THIS

 

DOESN'T HAPPEN.

 

WE KNOW WE HAVE A DEPARTMENT --

 

POLICE OFFICERS DO NOT LIKE

 

CALLING EACH OTHER OUT.

 

IT'S JUST REALLY UNCOMFORTABLE

 

FOR THEM.

 

SO WHAT ARE WE DOING TO CHANGE

 

THAT CULTURE?

 

WHAT ARE WE DOING TO MAKE SURE

 

THAT THEY BECOME COMFORTABLE

 

WITHHOLDING EACH OTHER

 

ACCOUNTABLE?

 

THAT IS WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN AND

 

NEEDS TO CHANGE ABOUT THIS

 

DEPARTMENT AND WE NEED TO HAVE

 

SYSTEMS IN PLACE AND PROTOCOLS

 

IN PLACE TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT

 

HAPPENS.

 

>> AND YOU WERE INSTRUMENTAL IN

 

TRYING TO LEAD THE REFORM

 

EFFORTS.

 

GAL PISSETZKY DO YOU THINK A

 

VERDICT LIKE THIS POURS COLD

 

WATER ON EFFORTS TO BRING

 

FORWARD A CONSENT DECREE AND

 

REFORM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT?

 

>> I DON'T THINK SO.

 

I THINK THE OFFICERS WROTE IN

 

REPORTS WHAT THEY SAW.

 

AND I THINK THESE OFFICERS ACTED

 

IN A WAY THAT ANY OFFICER SHOULD

 

ACT BECAUSE THEY PRESERVE THE

 

EVIDENCE.

 

WE DID HAVE THE TAPE.

 

WE DID HAVE ALL THE EVIDENCE

 

THAT THEY NEEDED TO PUT VAN DYKE

 

ON TRIAL.

 

THESE OFFICERS MAY HAVE HAD SOME

 

INCONSISTENCIES IN THEIR REPORTS

 

BUT THE BOTTOM LINE THEY SAID

 

THERE WAS A BATTERY AND THE

 

BATTERY WAS CHARGE IN THE VAN

 

DYKE'S CASE.

 

I DON'T THINK THAT WILL AFFECT

 

ANYTHING WITH THE REFORMS.

 

>> PETER KOCONIS, IS THERE A

 

CODE OF SILENCE ANYWHERE IN THE

 

POLICE DEPARTMENT?

 

CLEARLY THE JUDGE FOUND NOT IN

 

THIS CASE IS THERE A CULTURE OF

 

A CODE OF SILENCE?

 

>> I BELIEVE THAT GANGS DON'T

 

SNITCH ON EACH OTHER LAWYERS DO

 

NOT SNITCH ON EACH OTHER.

 

I THINK IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT

 

WHEN I WORKED IN THE INTERM

 

AFFAIRS DIVISION I DON'T BELIEVE

 

THERE WAS A CODE OF SILENCE AND

 

EVERYONE BELIEVES THERE IS NOW.

 

POLICE WILL TURN IN A CORRUPT

 

POLICEMAN THAT IS HOW WE GOT

 

CONVICTIONS OF EXTORTION AND

 

ROBBERIES IN THE WATTS CASE AND

 

THE PACKMAN CASE.

 

IT WAS POLICEMEN WHO CAME

 

FORWARD THAT GAVE EVIDENCE AND

 

INFORMATION AGAINST OTHER

 

POLICEMEN.

 

IF YOU ARE GOING TO TELL ME IF I

 

CALL SOMEBODY WHAT THE VERN

 

KNACKLER OUT OF THEIR NAME OR

 

SWEAR ON SOMEBODY OUT OF THE

 

STREET AM I SUPPOSED TO TURN TO

 

MY PARTNER AND I WILL TELL THE

 

SERGEANT ON YOU?

 

IT IS A DIFFERENT WEIGHT THERE.

 

>> THEY ARE NOT GOING TO COVER

 

UP EXTORTION, MURDER, ROBBERY,

 

RAPE.

 

THE POLICEMEN UNFORTUNATELY I

 

PARTICIPATED IN INVESTIGATIONS

 

OF THEM, POLICEMEN CAME FORWARD

 

AND SAID THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED.

 

BECAUSE POLICEMEN WHO ARE

 

CROOKED ARE PUTTING THE OTHER

 

POLICEMEN JOBS AND LIVES ON THE

 

LINE.

 

>> SHARON FAIRLEY HAS THAT BEEN

 

YOUR EXPERIENCE WHEN YOU LED

 

I.P.R.A. AND C.O.P.A. DO YOU

 

AGREE?

 

>> MY EXPERIENCE IS THAT THE

 

PROBLEMS THAT WE FACE IS THAT

 

THE WAY THE PROCESS WORKS

 

THERE'S TOO MUCH OPPORTUNITY FOR

 

OFFICERS TO GET THEIR STORIES

 

STRAIGHT.

 

AND EVEN IF THERE IS NO

 

NEFARIOUS INTENT THERE IS

 

OPPORTUNITY.

 

THIS OCCURRED BACK WHEN THE RULE

 

DID NOT REQUIRE THAT OFFICERS BE

 

SEPARATED AFTER A SHOOTING.

 

SO THEY ALL WENT BACK TO THE

 

HEADQUARTERS TOGETHER AND SAT

 

DOWN AND TALKED ABOUT IT.

 

AND SO EVEN IF THEY DIDN'T

 

INTEND TO CONSPIRE TO MAKEUP A

 

STORY --

 

>> THERE IS A PERCEPTION

 

PROBLEM.

 

>> THEY HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY

 

ONE PERSON LISTENS TO WHAT THE

 

OTHER PERSON SAYS AND I WILL

 

ADOPT THE SAME STORY.

 

THESE ARE THE SYSTEMIC CHANGES

 

THAT WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT

 

THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN.

 

>> HOW EQUIPPED IS THE CITY NOW

 

IN 2019 TO DEAL WITH THE

 

SITUATION LIKE THIS SHOULD IT

 

ARISE AGAIN AS OPPOSED TO WHEN

 

THIS CASE HAPPENED IN 2014?

 

>> I MEAN, THIS HIGHLIGHTS THE

 

NEED FOR THAT EXTERNAL REVIEW

 

THAT EXTERNAL OVERSIGHT AND AS

 

SHARON SAID WHAT IS GOING TO

 

HAPPEN NEXT?

 

C.P.D. HAS SHOWN THEY HAVE NOT

 

BEEN ABLE AND THEY ARE NOT TO

 

CHANGE ON THEIR OWN.

 

I AGREE AND DISAGREE WITH PETER

 

KOCONIS WHAT I AGREE WITH IS

 

THAT A CODE OF SILENCE AND

 

CORRUPT ACTIONS CRIMINAL ACTIONS

 

BY POLICE OFFICERS HURT GOOD

 

POLICE OFFICERS HONEST POLICE

 

OFFICERS MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE

 

IN THE WORLD.

 

BUT WHAT I DISAGREE WITH IS

 

ABOUT OFFICERS COMING FORWARD.

 

EVEN IN THE CASES THAT YOU

 

TALKED ABOUT.

 

IN THE WATTS CASE, THE OFFICERS

 

WHO CAME FORWARD WHAT HAPPENED

 

TO THEM?

 

THEIR LIVES WERE MADE A LIVING

 

HELL BECAUSE THEY BROKE THE CODE

 

OF SILENCE.

 

AND WHAT HAPPENED A JURY FOUND

 

THE CODE OF SILENCE IN THE CASE

 

AND A.T.F. AGENTS LIVES WERE PUT

 

ON THE LINE BECAUSE THEY ARE

 

STUCK HER NECKS OUT.

 

AND SO THAT IS THE PROBLEM THAT

 

I HAVE WITH THE VERDICT ALSO IS

 

THAT NOT ONLY DOES IT SEND A BAD

 

MESSAGE TO THE COMMUNITY BUT IT

 

SENDS A BAD MESSAGE TO THE

 

OFFICERS DOING THEIR JOBS IN

 

THIS CASE, ITSELF, TOO IT WAS

 

SOMEONE WITHIN LAW ENFORCEMENT

 

WHO HAD THE COURAGE TO GIVE ME A

 

CALL TO SAY TAKE A LOOK AT THIS.

 

THERE IS A VIDEO HERE SOMETHING

 

WRONG HAPPENED.

 

>> HOW COULD THIS VERDICT AFFECT

 

COMMUNITY-POLICE RELATIONS?

 

>> I THINK THE MAJOR THING WE

 

NEED IN THE COMMUNITY THAT

 

EVERYBODY IS SAYING NOW ECONOMIC

 

DEVELOPMENT, I THINK WE NEED THE

 

COMMUNITY TO COME FORWARD AND

 

TALK ABOUT THESE GANGS AND

 

SHOOTINGS AND SOMEHOW WE HAVE TO

 

GET THE COMMUNITIES TO

 

UNDERSTAND THAT THE POLICEMEN

 

THAT ARE THERE THAT ARE TRYING

 

TO DO THE RIGHT THING NEED THEIR

 

HELP.

 

THE POLICE NEED THE HELP OF THE

 

COMMUNITY IN ALL THESE INSTANCES

 

WITH THE RIDICULOUS AMOUNTS OF

 

3,000 SHOOTINGS AND 500 PEOPLE

 

KILLED.

 

IF NOBODY COMES FORWARD, AND

 

GIVES POLICE JUST --

 

GIVE ME A LEAD.

 

GIVE ME AN IDEA.

 

GIVE ME WHAT GANG.

 

GIVE ME ANYTHING.

 

>> CLEARLY A LOT OF MISTRUST.

 

>> BUT NOBODY SAYS ANYTHING AND

 

THE POLICEMEN I DON'T THINK

 

MISTRUST THE COMMUNITY.

 

I THINK THE POLICEMEN DON'T HAVE

 

INTERACTION WITH THE COMMUNITY.

 

AND COMMUNITY POLICING NEVER

 

WORKED.

 

AND YOU HAVE TO GET BACK TO THE

 

BEAT OFFICER KNOWING THE PEOPLE

 

THAT HE IS WORKING FOR.

 

>> WE HAVE TO LEAVE IT THERE AND

 

THIS IS A DISCUSSION TO BE

 

CONTINUED BUT SHARON FAIRLEY,

 

CRAIG FUTTERMAN AND GAL

 

PISSETZKY AND PETER KOCONIS

 

THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH.

 

UP NEXT, BRANDIS UPDATES US ON

 

MORE OF THE DAY'S TOP STORIES.

 

>> MORE OF WHAT IS MAKING NEWS

 

IN CHICAGO TONIGHT.

 

FOR HIS SECOND BILL SIGNING NEW

 

GOVERNOR J.B. PRITZKER IS

 

REQUIRING GUN DEALERS IN

 

ILLINOIS TO HAVE A STATE

 

LICENSE.

 

THE LAW ATTEMPTS TO CRACKDOWN ON

 

ILLEGAL GUN PURCHASES BY

 

REQUIRING FIREARMS DEALERS TO

 

COMPLETE ANNUAL TRAINING, SAFELY

 

STORE WEAPONS TO PREVENT THEFT

 

AND HAVE EMPLOYEES UNDER GO

 

BACKGROUND CHECKS.

 

IT ALSO PROHIBITS GUN DEALERS

 

FROM OPENING A BUSINESS WITHIN

 

500 FEET OF A SCHOOL OR DAYCARE.

 

>> THERE ARE A LOT OF PROVISIONS

 

OF THIS LEGISLATION THAT DO MUCH

 

MORE THAN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

 

DOES.

 

AND THAT ARE AN EXPRESSION OF

 

THE VALUES OF THE PEOPLE OF

 

ILLINOIS THEY ARE JUST WRONG.

 

AND I WILL CONTINUE TO MAKE SURE

 

THAT WE'RE STANDING UP TO THE

 

VOICES LIKE THE ILLINOIS STATE

 

RIFLE ASSOCIATION AND THE

 

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION.

 

>> AND AND THE ILLINOIS STATE

 

RIFLE ASSOCIATION CONDEMNS THE

 

LAW SAYING IT IS UNNECESSARY

 

BECAUSE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

 

ALREADY REGULATES FIREARMS

 

DEALERS AND THE COST OF

 

REGISTRATION WILL HURT SMALL

 

BUSINESS OWNERS.

 

SUPPORTERS SAY THAT FEDERAL

 

OVERSIGHT IS INSUFFICIENT.

 

>> TODAY, A TENANTS RIGHTS

 

ATTORNEY FOR R. KELLY IS SAYING

 

A CITY INSPECTION PROVES THIS

 

CLIENT'S CASE.

 

HE CLAIMS NO ONE IS LIVING IN

 

THE WAREHOUSE THAT THE SINGER

 

RENTS ON THE NEAR WEST SIDE.

 

THE CITY INSPECT TO DO

 

YESTERDAY, WEDNESDAY.

 

THE ATTORNEY CALLED THE

 

INSPECTION UNEVENTFUL AND ARGUES

 

THAT THERE WERE NO DANGEROUS OR

 

EMERGENCY CONDITIONS THAT SHOULD

 

HAVE WARRANTED THE CITY'S

 

EMERGENCY COMPLAINT.

 

TO THE CONTRARY THOSE INSPECTORS

 

YESTERDAY SAID THEY DID FIND

 

EVIDENCE OF RESIDENTIAL USE

 

WHICH IS NOT ZONED AS SUCH.

 

THE CASE IS BACK IN COURT ON

 

TUESDAY.

 

>> ILLINOIS STATE POLICE ARE

 

PREPARING TO LAY ONE TO REST

 

TOMORROW.

 

LAW ENFORCEMENT ARE PAYING

 

RESPECTS TO THE FAMILY OF

 

TROOPER CHRISTOPHER LAMBERT AT

 

WILLOW CREEK COMMUNITY CHURCH.

 

LAMBERT WAS KILLED WHEN STRUCK

 

BY I ACAR WHILE WORKING ON

 

ANOTHER CAR ACCIDENT.

 

HE LEAVES BEHIND A WIFE AND

 

ONE-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER.

 

HIS FUNERAL WILL BE HELD AT THE

 

SAME CHURCH TOMORROW MORNING.

 

>>> AS FOR THE WEATHER, TONIGHT

 

CLOUDY WITH A LOAF OF 24 AND

 

TOMORROW A HIGH OF 29 AND MOSTLY

 

CLOUDY UNTIL 5:00 P.M. WHEN THE

 

SNOW BEGINS.

 

4-6 INCHES OF SNOW ARE POSSIBLE

 

IN NORTHERN AND CENTRAL ILLINOIS

 

TOMORROW NIGHT THROUGH SATURDAY.

 

>> AND YOU CAN GET "CHICAGO

 

TONIGHT" STREAMED ON Facebook,

 

YouTube AND OUR WEBSITE,

 

WTTW.COM/NEWS.

 

AND YOU CAN ALSO WATCH VIA

 

PODCAST AND THE PBS VIDEO APP.

 

NOW, PARIS, BACK TO YOU.

 

>> THANKS, BRANDIS.

 

>>> STILL TO COME ON "CHICAGO

 

TONIGHT", COULD MARIJUANA HELP

 

KEEP PEOPLE OFF OF OPIOIDS?

 

ASSESSING THE OPIOID CRISIS AND

 

EFFORTS TO SAVE LIVES.

 

>>> A NEW TREND CALLED DRY

 

JANUARY WHAT TO EXPECT IF YOU

 

GIVE NOT DRINKING A TRY.

 

>>> DOWNTON ABBEY STAR BRENDAN

 

COYLE TALKS ABOUT PLAYING THE

 

THEATER FOR THE FIRST TIME AND A

 

LOOK AT THE PUPPET THEATER ARE

 

HEATHER HENSON.

 

>> SOME OF THE ELEMENTS PROPOSED

 

BY FIVE ARCHITECTURAL GROUPS

 

SELECTED AS FINALISTS TO REBUILD

 

O'HARE'S TERMINAL TWO PART OF

 

THE $8.5 BILLION EXPANSION PLAN

 

AND CITY OFFICIALS WANT TO HEAR

 

WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THE DESIGNS

 

UNVEILED TODAY.

 

THE FIVE MOCK-UP PLANS ARE ON

 

DISPLAY DOWNTOWN AT THE CHICAGO

 

ARCHITECTURAL FOUNDATION AND AT

 

O'HARE'S TERMINAL TWO.

 

THEY WANT THE BUILDING TO MAKE A

 

DAZZLING FIRST IMPRESSION ON

 

TRAVELERS COMING THROUGH TOWN.

 

>> IMAGINE AS THEY COME FROM

 

CHINA, JAPAN, FRANCE, KENYA FROM

 

ALL PARTS OF THE WORLD AND THEY

 

GET OFF AND THIS IS THEIR

 

OPENING TO AMERICA.

 

>> WE ARE CHICAGO WE WANT THE

 

BEST AND WE WANT AN EXPERIENCE

 

THAT IS FROM THE CURB TO THE

 

GATE IS REVOLUTIONARY USES THE

 

MOST MODERN TECHNOLOGY HAS THE

 

BEST AMENITIES IN THE WORLD AND

 

IS THE MOST ACCESSIBLE.

 

>> CITY OFFICIALS SAY THEY

 

SELECTED THE FIVE OUT OF 12

 

SUBMISSIONS TOTAL AND ASKING THE

 

PUBLIC TO WEIGH-IN.

 

A THOUSAND PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY

 

VOTED IN THE FIRST FEW HOURS.

 

THE FINAL SAY WILL COME DOWN TO

 

A SECRETIVE COMMITTEE.

 

THE MAYOR HE AOFFICE DECLINED TO

 

RELEASE THE NAMES OF

 

COMMITTEEMEMBERS BUT AMERICAN,

 

UNITED AND OTHER CARRIERS WILL

 

PLAY A ROLE.

 

>> WE'LL HAND ALL THE DATA OVER

 

TO THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE FOR

 

THEM TO USE WHEN THEY ARE

 

EVALUATING THE PROPOSALS.

 

>> THE PROPOSALS RANGE FROM THIS

 

ROOF DESIGN FROM A TEAM CALLED

 

FENTRESS-EXP-BROOKS-GARZA.

 

FOSTER EPSTEIN MORENO JV

 

SUBMITTED THIS PLAN FOR A

 

MASSIVE CURVED MAIN HALL.

 

CHICAGO BASED STUDIO ORD

 

FEATURING JENNY GANG FEATURES

 

LOTS OF INDOOR TREES AND GRASS

 

IN THE FLOOR.

 

KID SKIDMORE OWINGS AND MERRILL

 

IS PROPOSING THIS DESIGN PLAYING

 

UP O'HARE'S ORIGINAL DESIGNATION

 

AS ORCHARD FIELD AND SANTIAGO

 

CALATRAVA IS PROPOSING A

 

REDESIGN FOR THE TERMINAL AND

 

HOTELS AND PARKING GARAGES.

 

THE MAYOR SAYS THE BOLD PLANS

 

ARE NEEDED FOR O'HARE TO KEEP

 

PACE WITH AIRPORTS AROUND THE

 

WORLD.

 

>> EVERYONE OF THOSE TERMINALS

 

ARE COMPETITORS AND SUBMISSIONS

 

LOOK LIKE SOMETHING THAT YOU

 

WOULD SEE IN THE FAR EAST OR THE

 

MIDDLE EAST.

 

THAT IS GOING TO BE HERE IN THE

 

MIDWEST.

 

>> EMANUEL HAS NOT SET FORTH A

 

TIME LINE BUT WANTS A DESIGN

 

SELECTED BEFORE HE LEAVES OFFICE

 

IN MAY.

 

THE FINAL PLAN IS EXPECTED TO

 

ADD 25% MORE GATE CAPACITY AND

 

INCREASE THE FOOTPRINT FROM FINE

 

PORTFOLIO 5 TO 8.9 MILLION

 

SQUARE FEET AND CONSTRUCTION IS

 

EXPECTED TO START IN 2021 AND

 

FINISH IN 2028 AND PAID FOR

 

THROUGH GATE AND CONCESSION

 

FEES.

 

>>> CAN MARIJUANA BE A TREATMENT

 

TO KEEP PEOPLE OFF OF OPIOIDS?

 

AN ILLINOIS PROGRAM AIMS TO

 

REDUCE OPIOID ADECKION BY

 

ALLOWING PEOPLE TO USE CANNABIS

 

INSTEAD AS MORE PEOPLE ARE

 

LIKELY TO DIE FROM OPIOID

 

OVERDOSE THAN FROM A CAR CRASH

 

AND THE RATE IS HIGHER IN

 

ILLINOIS.

 

JOINING US IS FAMILY PHYSICIAN

 

DR.ELIZABETH SALISBURY-AFSHAR,

 

SHE IS THE DIRECTOR OF THE

 

CENTER FOR MULTISYSTEM SOLUTIONS

 

TO THE OPIOID EPIDEMIC AT THE

 

AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH.

 

AND PROVIDES ADDICTION TREATMENT

 

TO PATIENTS AT HEARTLAND

 

ALLIANCE HEALTH AND WAS THE

 

POINT PERSON FOR OPIOIDS AT THE

 

CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

 

HEALTH.

 

THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.

 

>> THANKS FOR HAVING ME.

 

>> IS MARIJUANA AN EFFECTIVE

 

ALTERNATIVE FOR OPIOIDS?

 

>> SO I THINK THIS IS AN AREA

 

THAT IS REALLY HARD TO ANSWER

 

RIGHT NOW PRIMARILY BECAUSE

 

MARIJUANA IS A SCHEDULE ONE DRUG

 

MEANS IT'S ILLEGAL AT THE

 

FEDERAL LEVEL.

 

REGARDLESS OF WHAT STATES DO

 

THERE ARE LIMITATIONS HOW WE CAN

 

RESEARCH IT AND STUDY IT WHICH

 

MEANS WE ARE NOT ABLE TO DO THE

 

SAME MEDICAL STUDIES THAT WE

 

WOULD FOR OTHER DRUGS.

 

>> WE DON'T HAVE CLEAR

 

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON THE CAUSE

 

AND EFFECT BUT WE HAVE ANECDOTAL

 

STORIES?

 

AND SOME STUDIES THAT LOOK LIKE

 

IT DOES REDUCE PAIN SYMPTOMS AND

 

OPIOID DESCRIBING AND OTHER

 

STUDIES SHOW NO BENEFIT THE

 

CHALLENGE IS WE DON'T HAVE A

 

CLEAR SENSE AND THE STUDIES ARE

 

NOT THE TYPES OF STUDIES WE

 

WANT.

 

WHEN YOU TRY TO LOOK AT THEM

 

ACROSS THE BOARD IT IS NOT A

 

CONSISTENT MESSAGE TO TELL US

 

YES IT IS A GOODALL TERNE ACTIVE

 

FOR PAIN.

 

>> WITH THIS ILLINOIS LAW IF YOU

 

GET AN OPIOID PRESCRIPTION HOW

 

DOES THE PILOT PROGRAM WORK NOW?

 

>> THE WAY THAT THE PILOT

 

PROGRAM WORKS IF A PHYSICIAN

 

DEEMED THERE IS A PATIENT WHO

 

WOULD QUALIFY FOR AN OPIOID, YOU

 

CAN BASICALLY CERTIFY THAT THEY

 

HAVE A CONDITION THAT THEN WOULD

 

ALLOW THEM TO GET A SHORT-TERM,

 

A 90-DAY MEDICAL MARIJUANA CARD.

 

>> IS THERE ANY EVIDENCE TO

 

SUGGEST THAT SUBSTITUTING ONE

 

ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCE FOR ANOTHER

 

COULD CAUSE PROBLEMS?

 

>> SO I THINK YOU KNOW, THIS

 

OFTEN COMES UP WHEN WE TALK

 

ABOUT OPIOID ADDICTION

 

TREATMENT.

 

AND SO I THINK IT --

 

>> BECAUSE METHADONE IS A

 

TREATMENT AND THAT CAN BE

 

ADDICTIVE TOO.

 

>> WE HAVE A STRONG CASE FOR

 

METHADONE WHICH ARE OPIOIDS WHY

 

WOULD YOU SUBSTITUTE ONE OPIOID

 

FOR ANOTHER.

 

WHAT WE KNOW WE HAVE BEEN ABLE

 

TO STUDY THEM AND THEY ARE FDA

 

APPROVED AND WE KNOW THAT THEY

 

DO THINGS LIKE REDUCE THE RISK

 

THAT SOMEONE RESUMES OPIOID USE

 

AND REUSE ILLICIT USE AND THEY

 

REDUCE RISK OF DEATH AND WE HAVE

 

LONG-TERM STUDIES WITH LARGE

 

NUMBERS OF PATIENTS SHOWING

 

THESE SAME FINDINGS OVER AND

 

OVER WHEN WE THINK OF MEDICAL

 

EVIDENCE WE HAVE A LOT OF

 

EVIDENCE THAT THE TREATMENTS ARE

 

EFFECTIVE.

 

>> ON THE OTHER HAND IS THERE

 

EVIDENCE THAT SUGGESTS THAT

 

MARIJUANA USE COULD HELP WEAN

 

PEOPLE OFF OF OPIOIDS?

 

>> I THINK THAT IS WHERE WE HAVE

 

ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE.

 

WE HAVE PEOPLE WHO SAY THAT THEY

 

REALLY FEEL IT HELPS THEM BUT

 

BECAUSE WE CANNOT STUDY IT THE

 

WAY WE STUDY OTHER DRUGS WE

 

DON'T HAVE THAT TYPE OF EVIDENCE

 

TO SAY THAT THIS WILL HELP TREAT

 

ADDICTION OR THAT IT WILL WEEN

 

PEOPLE OFF OPIOIDS FOR PAIN.

 

>> HOW DO MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS

 

THINK OF THIS MOVEMENT AWAY FROM

 

OPIOIDS AND TOWARDS CANNABIS?

 

>> I THINK WE RECOGNIZE AS A

 

MEDICAL FIELD THAT WE WERE

 

OVERPRESCRIBING OPIOIDS FOR A

 

LOT OF TIME THERE WAS A LOT OF

 

MISINFORMATION AND A BELIEF THAT

 

THEY WERE SAFER THAN THEY

 

PROBABLY WERE.

 

AND OPIOIDS DO NOT HAVE GREAT

 

IMPACTS ON PAIN FOR PEOPLE WITH

 

CHRONIC PAIN AND THEY UNDERSTOOD

 

THE CHALLENGES WE HAVE HAD FOR

 

PATIENTS WHO HAVE BEEN ON

 

OPIOIDS FOR A LONGTIME.

 

MOST PEOPLE DON'T HAVE

 

ADDICTION.

 

AND NOW FIGURING OUT HOW TO BACK

 

OUT OF THAT SPACE HOW TO HELP

 

PEOPLE HOW TO FIND DIFFERENT

 

MODALITIES OFTENTIMES OTHER

 

OPTIONS ARE NOT COVERED BY

 

INSURANCE AND THINGS LIKE

 

PHYSICAL THERAPY PAY COPAYS

 

EVERY TIME YOU GO.

 

IT IS A CHALLENGING SPACE TO BE

 

IN RIGHT NOW.

 

I THINK ALL OF US ARE OPEN TO

 

EXPLORING NEW OPTIONS WE ALL

 

WANT TO FIND THINGS TO HELP OUR

 

PATIENTS AND MAKE SURE WE ARE

 

NOT GIVING PEOPLE THINGS THAT

 

MAY INCREASE RISK.

 

>> AND YOU MENTION

 

OVERPRESCRIBING POSSIBLY AND I

 

READ A STAT SINCE 1999 THERE ARE

 

THREE TIMES AS MANY OPIOIDS

 

PRESCRIBED TODAY.

 

WHY DID THAT HAPPEN?

 

>> I THINK LIKE MOST THINGS IN

 

LIFE AND IN PUBLIC HEALTH IT'S

 

COMPLICATED.

 

BUT WE KNOW PHARMACEUTICAL

 

MARKETING PLAYED A ROLE.

 

THIS SORT OF REALLY HEAVY

 

PROMOTION THAT THE DRUGS WERE

 

SAFE AND IF THEY WERE NOT

 

WORKING WE SHOULD PRESCRIBE MORE

 

AND MORE.

 

AND WE KNOW THOSE CLAIMS WERE

 

NOT TRUE OR EVIDENCE-BASED BUT I

 

THINK THERE ARE A LOT OF

 

PRESSURES ON PHYSICIANS TO MEET

 

PATIENT DEMANDS TO SORT OF SEE

 

AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE AND

 

ALSO OTHER ALTERNATIVES AGAIN

 

THINGS LIKE ACUPUNCTURE,

 

MASSAGE, BY THE TYPE OF PAIN,

 

THOSE THINGS OFTEN ARE NOT

 

COVERED.

 

SO THE THINGS THAT PEOPLE HAD

 

ACCESS TO WERE ON THE

 

PRESCRIPTION PAD.

 

SO THERE WERE A LOT OF FACTORS

 

THAT PLAYED A ROLE.

 

THERE IS A LOT OF PRESSURE ON

 

DOCTORS WE SHOULD BE ASKING

 

ABOUT PAIN AND TREAT TO GO MORE

 

AGGRESSIVELY.

 

>> YOU WORK FOR A FEDERALLY

 

QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER YOU

 

CANNOT PRESCRIBE MARIJUANA

 

BECAUSE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

 

AND MARIJUANA IS ILLEGAL ON A

 

FEDERAL LEVEL?

 

>> RIGHT.

 

SO THERE ARE CERTAIN TYPES OF

 

CLINICS AND HEALTH CENTERS AND

 

BECAUSE FEDERALLY IT IS ILLEGAL

 

WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO CERTIFY

 

PEOPLE FOR MARIJUANA IN THE WAY

 

THAT SOMEONE IN PRIVATE PRACTICE

 

IS ABLE TO.

 

>> AND YOU BROUGHT NARCAN WITH

 

YOU THIS IS WHAT YOU GIVE PEOPLE

 

WHO ARE OVERDOSING IT IS NOT A

 

CURE BUT IT IS TO TREAT THE

 

SYMPTOM.

 

>> WE KNOW WHEN WE THINK ABOUT

 

EVIDENCE-BASED AND HOW TO

 

APPROACH THE OPIOID TREATMENT.

 

NALOXONE IS A MEDICATION TO

 

REVERSE AN OVERDOSE ANYONE CAN

 

CARRY IF YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO IS

 

OVERDOSING YOU CAN GIVE THE

 

MEDICATIONS.

 

THIS IS THE NASAL SPRAY AND THE

 

SYRINGE AND THIS TALKS TO YOU

 

AND.

 

>> AND THE NALOXONE IS SOMETHING

 

THAT HOSPITALS ARE GIVING OUT

 

AND THE COOK COUNTY JAIL IS

 

GIVING OUT TO INMATES THAT THE

 

ARE LEAVING.

 

DR.ELIZABETH SALISBURY-AFSHAR

 

THANK YOU FOR COMING.

 

AND BRANDIS IS BACK WITH MORE

 

RIGHT AFTER THIS.

 

[♪♪♪]

 

>> 100 YEARS AGO THIS WEEK,

 

AMERICA'S NOBLE EXPERIMENT

 

PROHIBITION WENT INTO EFFECT AND

 

FAST FORWARD TO TODAY AND MANY

 

WOULD SAY AMERICA HAS DEVELOPED

 

A DEEP LOVE AND APPRECIATION FOR

 

ALCOHOL.

 

ASIDE FROM THE BEVERAGES, EVENTS

 

LIKE WINE AND PAINT OR BEER

 

TASTINGSES AT THE MICRO

 

BREWERIES CAN MAKE ANY WEEKEND A

 

BOOZEY ONE BUT A NEW TREND

 

REQUIRES PARTICIPANTS TO DITCH

 

ALCOHOL FOR THE FIRST MONTH OF

 

THE NEW YEAR.

 

IT'S CALLED DRY JANUARY AND FOR

 

SOME OF YOU FOR 17 DAYS IN.

 

JOINING US TO DISCUSS THE FAD

 

AND BENEFITS ARE JEN BRUNING

 

SPOKESPERSON FOR THE ACADEMY OF

 

NUTRITION AND DANIEL FRIDBERG AN

 

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF

 

PSYCHIATRY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF

 

CHICAGO.

 

DANIEL FRIDBERG'S WORK FOCUSES

 

ON ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT OF

 

SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND ADDICTIONS.

 

WELCOME BOTH OF YOU TO "CHICAGO

 

TONIGHT."

 

DAN, WHERE DID THIS TREND COME

 

FROM?

 

HOW LONG HAVE PEOPLE BEEN DOING

 

IT?

 

>> THIS IS I APUBLIC HEALTH

 

INITIATIVE THAT STARTED OVERSEAS

 

IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND IS

 

STARTING TO GAIN STEAM IN THE

 

UNITED STATES THROUGH SOCIAL

 

MEDIA.

 

AND THE IDEA IS ON THE SURFACE

 

SIMPLE.

 

ABSTAIN FOR ALCOHOL FOR A MONTH

 

IN JANUARY.

 

>> JEN, WHY ARE PEOPLE TRY TO

 

GO?

 

>> I THINK IT'S TIED TO NEW

 

YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS AND

 

OFTENTIMES WE HAVE A DESIRE TO

 

RECONNECT WITH OUR HEALTH AND

 

START OFF THE NEW YEAR ON THE

 

RIGHT FOOT.

 

>> IS THERE A SPECTRUM TO

 

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION THE

 

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CASUAL

 

DRINKING AND ADDICTION?

 

>> THE LOWER RISK LEVEL OF

 

DRINKING WOULD BE FOR A WOMAN

 

ABOUT SEVEN DRINKS A WEEK OR

 

FEWER.

 

AND THOSE ARE STANDARD ALCOHOLIC

 

DRINKS.

 

WHEN YOU EXCEED THOSE LIMITS YOU

 

DO START TO SEE THE ODDS OR THE

 

RISK FACTORS FOR PROBLEMS START

 

TO DEVELOP MORE.

 

YOU START TO SEE PEOPLE HAVE

 

PROBLEMS AFTER THAT.

 

>> WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO

 

GIVING IT UP FOR A MONTH?

 

>> YOU CAN SEE SOME NICE THINGS

 

HAPPEN.

 

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT PEOPLE

 

SEE MOST OFTEN IS THAT THERE'S

 

QUALITY OF SLEEP IMPROVES WHICH

 

CAN HAVE A TRICKLE-DOWN EFFECT

 

IN EVERY PART OF YOUR LIFE.

 

YOU HAVE MORE ATTENTION AND

 

FOCUS YOUR MOOD AND ATTITUDE CAN

 

IMPROVE.

 

SOME FOLKS CAN SEE WEIGHT LOSS.

 

AND THINK THE MOST COMPELLING

 

REASON TO GIVE IT A TRY IS TAKE

 

THE TIME TO REEXAMINE YOUR

 

RELATIONSHIP WITH ALCOHOL AND

 

WHAT ROLE IT PLAYS IN YOUR LIFE.

 

>> WHAT ABOUT THE STUDIES THAT

 

SAY ONE GLASS OF RED WINE IS

 

GOOD FOR ME?

 

>> THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT A

 

SMALL AMOUNT OF RED WINE MAY

 

HAVE A BENEFIT WHEN IT COMES TO

 

HEART HEALTH BUT THE EVIDENCE IS

 

NOT STRONG ENOUGH THAT PEOPLE

 

SHOULD START TO DRINK FOR HEALTH

 

REASONS AND ALCOHOL IS A TOXIN

 

AND IT CAN BE HARMFUL TO EVERY

 

PART OF THE BODY.

 

TAKING A STEP AWAY IS A HEALTHY

 

THING THAT PEOPLE CAN DO.

 

>> AND DAN MENTIONED THE

 

PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS FOR MONTHS

 

CAN GIVE YOU TIME TO REFLECT

 

WHAT IS BEHIND YOUR URGE TO

 

DRINK.

 

>> SHE TOOK THE WORDS OUT OF MY

 

MOUTH.

 

THE RELATIONSHIP WITH ALCOHOL IS

 

IMPORTANT.

 

ARE YOU DRINKING BECAUSE YOU ARE

 

BORED?

 

DEPRESSED?

 

ANXIOUS?

 

TO DEAL WITH OTHER PROBLEMS THAT

 

ALCOHOL IS NOT EFFECTIVE COPING

 

STRATEGY.

 

THOSE OF US IN THE PSYCHOLOGICAL

 

SERVICES BUSINESS WOULD

 

RECOMMEND MANY OTHER

 

INTERVENTIONS MORE EFFECTIVE

 

LONGER TERM AND HAVE FEWER

 

HEALTH CONSEQUENCES.

 

>> WHAT ARE THE LONGER TERM

 

BENEFITS FOR GIVING UP ALCOHOL

 

FOR THE MONTH?

 

>> IF YOU WANT TO GO LONGER THAN

 

A MONTH YOU CAN START TO IMPACT

 

SOME OF THOSE LONG-TERM CHRONIC

 

HEALTH CONDITIONS THAT CAN COME

 

FROM AN UNHEALTHY LIFESTYLE.

 

YOU CAN REDUCE BREAST CANCER IN

 

WOMEN AND HEART DISEASE AND

 

DISEASES OF THE LIVER LIKE

 

CIRRHOSIS.

 

>> DO PEOPLE FIND THEMSELVES

 

USING SUGAR TO REPLACE ALCOHOL?

 

>> ABSOLUTELY.

 

IT'S IMPORTANT IF YOU ARE GOING

 

TO GIVE UP SOMETHING LIKE

 

ALCOHOL THAT YOU HAVE A PLAN IN

 

PLACE FOR HEALTHY BEHAVIORS THAT

 

YOU REPLACE THAT ALCOHOL WITH.

 

THINGS LIKE HAVING OTHER

 

BEVERAGES AROUND THAT YOU CAN BE

 

EXCITED ABOUT LIKE FLAVORS OF

 

SPARKLING WATER ON TREND RIGHT

 

NOW OR MAKING MOCKTAILS AT HOME.

 

THAT CAN GIVE YOU SOMETHING ELSE

 

THAT YOU CAN ENJOY IN PLACE OF

 

THE ALCOHOL SO YOU ARE NOT

 

TAKING IN COMFORT FOODS AND

 

SUGAR AND THINGS THAT ARE

 

WORKING AGAINST YOU IN THE LONG

 

RUN.

 

>> I WANT TO COME BACK TO THE

 

MOCKTAILS.

 

WHAT ARE YOUR TIPS TO STAY

 

MOTIVATED?

 

>> WHY ARE YOU DECIDING TO

 

ABSTAIN FROM ALCOHOL IN THE

 

MONTH OF JANUARY?

 

WHAT ARE YOUR OWN REASONS?

 

IT MIGHT BE CHALLENGING TO

 

MOTIVATE YOURSELF IF YOUR REASON

 

IS BECAUSE YOU SAW IT ON

 

Facebook.

 

YOU MIGHT MORE MOTIVATED IF YOU

 

THINK ABOUT YOUR DESIRE TO MAKE

 

LOSE WEIGHT OR REEXAMINE YOUR

 

RELATIONSHIP WITH ALCOHOL OR

 

EXPLORE OTHER ACTIVITIES AND SO

 

FORTH.

 

>> DOES IT HELP TO HAVE MAYBE A

 

BUDDY OR COMMUNITY DOING THE

 

SAME THING NOT JUST ON

 

Facebook BUT SOMETHING

 

SIMILAR?

 

>> THAT COULD BE HELPFUL.

 

I ADVISE MY PATIENTS WHEN THEY

 

ARE TALKING TO ME ABOUT SLOWING

 

DOWN OR STOPPING DRINKING BRING

 

PEOPLE INTO THIS WITH YOU.

 

LET YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY AND

 

THOSE THAT YOU TRUST KNOW SO

 

THEY CAN HELP YOU AND SUPPORT

 

YOU.

 

>> THE DRY WHY?

 

WHAT IS IT AND HOW CAN IT

 

MOTIVATE YOU?

 

>> IT IS WHAT DAN WAS SAYING

 

IT'S YOUR REASON FOR TAKING THIS

 

ON.

 

MAYBE YOU WANT TO BE A MORE

 

PRESENT PARENT HAVING A PICTURE

 

OF YOUR KIDS ON THE PHONE OR

 

FRIDGE TO REMIND YOU.

 

MAYBE IT IS A DAILY REMINDER TO

 

KEEP SAYING THAT IS WHY I'M

 

DOING THIS.

 

I CAN STAY STRONG AND GET

 

THROUGH THIS TIME.

 

>> AND DAN WHAT IF SOMEONE

 

REALIZES THAT THEY DO NEED HELP?

 

>> I WOULD SAY THE FIRST PLACE

 

TO START TO TALK TO YOUR

 

PHYSICIAN.

 

THAT IS PROBABLY THE FIRST PLACE

 

TO START FOR MOST PEOPLE.

 

REACH OUT TO THEM AND LET THEM

 

KNOW WHAT YOUR CONCERNS ARE AND

 

GO FROM THERE.

 

>> AND JEN, WE HAVE TO LEAVE

 

EVERYBODY WITH THE MOCKTAIL.

 

RECIPE TO TRY AT HOME?

 

>> YES.

 

I LOVE A FAUX HITO.

 

SPARKLING WATER, LIME FLAVORED

 

AND THE LIME AND THE MINT IN THE

 

GLASS AND SOMETHING SWEET YOU

 

CAN DO LEMON LIME SODA OR DO

 

HONEY, SUGAR OR AGAVEY TO GIVE

 

IT A SWEET TASTE AND MAKE THAT

 

REFRESHING MINT AND LIME STAND

 

OUT.

 

>> SOUNDS REFRESHING AND WE HAVE

 

EXAMPLES ON OUR WEBSITE AS WELL.

 

JEN BRUNING AND DANIEL FRIDBERG

 

THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.

 

>> AND YOU CAN VISIT OUR WEBSITE

 

FOR OTHER MOCKTAIL RECIPES AND

 

TIPS TO STAY MOTIVATED.

 

>>> AND FROM DOWNTON ABBEY TO

 

DOWNTOWN CHICAGO, A BRITISH

 

ACTOR HAS BROUGHT HIS ACTING

 

SKILLS FROM THE TV SCREEN TO THE

 

STAGE.

 

"CHICAGO TONIGHT" CAUGHT UP WITH

 

BRENDAN COYLE FOR HIS LOCAL

 

DEBUT AT THE GOODMAN THEATER.

 

EDDIE ARRUZA HAS THAT STORY.

 

>> I'M JOHN BASE.

 

>> ON DOWNTON ABBEY, BRENDAN

 

COYLE MADE A MEMORABLE

 

IMPRESSION AS Mr. JOHN BATES.

 

THROUGH SIX SEASONS OF THE HIT

 

SERIES THE CHARACTER EARNS THE

 

RESPECT OF THE STAFF AMID

 

THREATENING ACCUSATIONS AND A

 

BUDDING ROMANCE.

 

WE ASKED THE ACTOR ABOUT THE

 

EXPERIENCE OF PLAYING A KEY ROLE

 

IN THE DOWNTON ABBEY ENSEMBLE.

 

>> IT WAS PHENOMENAL WE DON'T

 

UNDERSTAND IT.

 

WE HAD THREE SCRIPTS THREE FIRST

 

EPISODES AND THIS IS NOT GOING

 

TO WORK.

 

AND IT WAS GOOD STORIES.

 

WE THOUGHT IT WOULD DO ALL RIGHT

 

BUT IT TIPPED INTO SOMETHING

 

ELSE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT

 

TIPPING POINT IS AND YOU CANNOT

 

BOTTLE IT.

 

IT BECAME A GLOBAL THING.

 

AND IT'S BEEN A GREAT RIDE.

 

WHAT A GIG.

 

EVERYONE LIKES TO BE IN A HIT.

 

>> ARE WE ALL RIGHT?

 

>> OF COURSE.

 

>> THE SUCCESS OF DOWNTON

 

FOLLOWS HIM AROUND THE WORLD.

 

>> WHEN I GOT HERE I TURNED ON

 

THE TV AND THERE IT WAS ON PBS.

 

IT CONTINUES WE WRAPPED THE

 

MOVIE IN NOVEMBER.

 

THE STORY CONTINUES.

 

I WAS A CHARACTER.

 

FAMOUS IN ALL THE WRONG WAYS.

 

>> COYLE IS CURRENTLY AT THE

 

GOODMAN THEATER PORTRAYING A

 

THEATER CRITIC HAUNTED BY

 

PERSONAL DEMONS AND POSSIBLY

 

VAMPIRES.

 

THE PLAY IS ST. NICHOLAS BY THE

 

IRISH PLAYWRIGHT CONNER

 

MacPHERSON WHO HAS A PENCHANT

 

FOR THE SUPERNATURAL.

 

>> HE IS ONE OF THE MOST

 

MONSTEROUS CREATIONS AND WHY HE

 

CHOSE A THEATER CRITIC I DON'T

 

KNOW.

 

MAYBE SOMETHING GOING ON.

 

BUT HE IS PRETTY AWFUL AND

 

DISILLUSIONED AND FULL OF SELF

 

LOATHING AND LOBILITYING FOR THE

 

PEOPLE HE CRITICIZES AND FULL OF

 

ENVY FOR THE ARTS.

 

HE IS A FRUSTRATED WRITER

 

HIMSELF.

 

HIS MARRIAGE IS IN DECLINE.

 

HIS KIDS DON'T WANT ANYTHING TO

 

DO WITH HIM.

 

>> AS THE LONE ACTOR IN THE SHOW

 

BRENDAN COYLE DIRECTLY ADDRESSES

 

THE AD YEBS.

 

>> WE ALL TAKE PART IN THIS

 

CONVENTION.

 

AND YOU WILL SAY THEY ARE NOT

 

VERY BELIEVABLE, ARE THEY?

 

THESE VAMPIRES.

 

>> THIS SPACE IS A BEAUTIFUL

 

SPACE AND IT GIVES US OUR TEAM

 

THE ABILITY TO CONNECT WITH

 

PEOPLE IN DIRECT WAY.

 

AND DIRECT ADDRESS ALLOWS THE

 

STORY TO UNLOCK THINGS IN

 

PEOPLE'S MINDS.

 

IT'S YEAH, IT IS IMMEDIATE.

 

WE BREAK THAT FOURTH WALL.

 

IT IS A TWO-HANDER IT'S ME AND

 

THE AUDIENCE.

 

AND THE ENERGY IS DIFFERENT

 

EVERY NIGHT.

 

CHICAGOANS HAVE BEEN FANTASTIC

 

THEY GET THE HUMOR.

 

THE QUALITY OF THE LISTENING TO

 

THE PIECE HAS BEEN AMAZING.

 

GRATIFYING FOR ALL OF US.

 

>> COYLE SEES THE PLAYWRIGHT'S

 

PLOT AS SOMETHING OF A METAPHOR.

 

>> IT IS A THEME.

 

IT'S A SENSE OF LONGING.

 

A DESIRE TO CONNECT THAT WE ALL

 

HAVE IN POST CATHOLIC IRELAND HE

 

STILL WRITES ABOUT SPIRITS AND

 

ANOTHER WORLD AND THE WORLD

 

FASCINATED BY AND TRAN SEND SI,

 

GHOST STORIES AND THE

 

SUPERNATURAL THE THEMES THAT RUN

 

THROUGH HIS WORK AND IT FREAKS

 

ALL OF US WE ARE ALL LOOKING FOR

 

ANSWERS AND A WAY TO CONNECT AND

 

UNDERSTAND AND SOMETHING THAT HE

 

USES BEAUTIFULLY.

 

SOMETIMES IT IS A WAY TO BRING

 

PEOPLE IN TO TELL A TRUTH OR GET

 

TO THE HEART OF SOMETHING.

 

BUT IT IS A CAPTIVATING WAY OF

 

STORYTELLING.

 

USING THE ANCIENT ART OF IRISH

 

STORYTELLING AND SPINS IN A

 

MODERN WAY.

 

>> HE MAY BE THE ONLY PERFORMER

 

IN THIS SHOW BUT WE ASKED AGAIN

 

ABOUT THE FAMOUS ENSEMBLE AND

 

THE DOWNTON ABBEY MOVIE

 

SCHEDULED TO OPEN IN THEATERS IN

 

SEPTEMBER.

 

>> WELL IT IS A DIRECT

 

CONTINUATION FROM THE LAST TIME

 

WE SAW ALL THE CHARACTERS.

 

IT DOESN'T EMBRACE ANY

 

PARTICULAR HISTORIC EVENT LIKE

 

THE TITANIC OR WORLD WAR I THAT

 

WE INCORPORATED.

 

IT IS A STORY ABOUT WHAT IS

 

HAPPENING TO THAT FAMILY.

 

THERE IS A ROYAL VISIT.

 

IT WILL BE GRAND AND IT WILL

 

LOOK AMAZING.

 

>> UNTIL THEN YOU CAN SEE HIM IN

 

A ROLE THAT IS SEPARATE FROM

 

Mr. BATES.

 

>> IF YOU COME TO THIS IT IS

 

BECAUSE YOU ARE A FAN AND YOU

 

ARE IN FOR A DIFFERENT

 

EXPERIENCE.

 

>> FOR "CHICAGO TONIGHT" I'M

 

EDDIE ARRUZA.

 

>> ST. NICHOLAS IS AT THE

 

GOODMAN THEATER UNTIL JANUARY

 

27TH.

 

HEAR MORE FROM ACTOR BRENDAN

 

COYLE ON OUR WEBSITE.

 

AND WE'RE BACK WITH MORE RIGHT

 

AFTER THIS.

 

>> EVERY OTHER YEAR CHICAGO

 

TEMPORARILY BECOMES THE PUPPET

 

CAPITAL OF THE WORLD.

 

THAT'S WHEN THE CHICAGO

 

INTERNATIONAL PUPPET THEATER

 

FESTIVAL BRINGS IN PUPPET

 

ARTISTS FROM AROUND THE WORLD TO

 

PERFORM SHOWS ACROSS THE CITY

 

FOR KIDS AND ADULTS.

 

2019 MARKS THE THIRD EDITION OF

 

THE BIENNIAL FESTIVAL AND

 

ARTISTS ARE HERE FROM JAPAN,

 

FRANCE, CAL CHILLY

 

CHILE AND ISRAEL.

 

WE WELCOME HEATHER HENSON AND TY

 

DEFOE.

 

>> THE SHOW THAT YOU CO-DIRECTED

 

KICKS OFF THE FESTIVAL TELL US

 

ABOUT "AJIJAAK ON TURTLE

 

ISLAND".

 

>> A STORY WE HAVE BEEN WORKING

 

ON FOR YEARS AND IT IS ABOUT A

 

WHOPPING CRANE AND A WHOPPING

 

CRANE ON THE FIRST MIGRATION

 

TRAVELING ALL THE WAY FROM

 

CANADA DOWN TO TEXAS AND BACK ON

 

THE FIRST MIGRATION.

 

AND IT --

 

>> ALONG THE WAY, SHE MEETS

 

INDIGENOUS PEOPLE WHO ARE

 

STEWARDS IN TAKING CARE OF THE

 

EARTH OF THE PAST AND THE

 

PRESENT AND GIVING MESSAGES FOR

 

FUTURE GENERATIONS TO COME ABOUT

 

THE SUSTAINABILITY AND HOW TO

 

TAKE CARE OF THE EARTH.

 

>> AND "AJIJAAK ON TURTLE

 

ISLAND" IS ON TURTLE ISLAND

 

WHERE DOES THAT COME FROM?

 

>> TURTLE ISLAND IS REFERRED TO

 

BY FIRST NATIONS PEOPLE,

 

NATIVE-AMERICAN PEOPLE AS THE

 

UNITED STATES, CANADA AND ALSO

 

MEXICO.

 

IF YOU GOOGLE GO ON GOOGLE

 

SEARCH YOU CAN SEE THE ENTIRE

 

CONTINENT IS THE SHAPE OF A

 

TURTLE'S BACK.

 

FROM HER MIGRATION FLIGHT WE

 

THOUGHT GREAT TO PLACE IT ON THE

 

LAND IN WHICH SHE IS FLYING

 

OVER.

 

>> AND HEATHER YOU ARE AN

 

ENVIRONMENTALIST AND IT SEEMS

 

THAT WORK IS REFLECTED IN THIS

 

WORK.

 

HOW DO THE TWO COME TOGETHER?

 

>> ALL MY SHOWS HAVE BEEN ABOUT

 

THE ENVIRONMENT AND HIGHLIGHTING

 

HOW PEOPLE CAN LIVE

 

SUSTAINABLELY ON THE LAND AND

 

LIVE IN HARMONY WITH OUR

 

ENVIRONMENT AND THE ANIMALS THAT

 

WE ALL SHARE THE SPACE WITH.

 

SO I COULDN'T DO THE SHOW

 

WITHOUT WORKING WITH THE STORIES

 

FROM THE FIRST NATIONS PEOPLE

 

THAT ARE FROM THIS LAND WE ARE

 

ON INDIGENOUS LAND SO LOOKING AT

 

THAT LIFESTYLE AND TELLING THE

 

STORY OF THE CRANE.

 

SO THE CRANE AND IN PARTICULAR

 

THE WHOPPING CRANE IS THE

 

LARGEST BIRD IN NORTH AMERICA

 

AND THE MOST RARE OF ALL SPECIES

 

OF BIRDS IS THE WHOPPING CRANE

 

ON THIS CONSISTENT THIS BIRD

 

RAPIDLY DECLINED AT THE TIME OF

 

COLONIZATION AND WENT DOWN TO

 

LESS THAN 20 BIRDS WERE LEFT BUT

 

THEN THE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN

 

RISING AND IT IS A BIRD THAT IS

 

COMING BACK AND WITH STRENGTH

 

AND A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE BEEN

 

WORKING TOGETHER TO MAKE THIS

 

BIRD COMING BACK IN THE GREAT

 

NUMBERS.

 

>> TELL US ABOUT YOUR BACK

 

STORY.

 

YOU ARE FROM THE MIDWEST.

 

>> I AM.

 

I GREW UP IN NORTHERN WISCONSIN.

 

AND SO SOME OF MY BACK STORY IS

 

THAT THROUGHOUT WISCONSIN YOU

 

KNOW GROWING UP LEARNING ABOUT

 

ORAL STORIES FROM TRADITIONAL

 

ELDERS AND THEN ALSO AAS AN

 

ARTIST MAKING MY CONTEMPORARY

 

ART I HAVE BEEN ALL OVER THE

 

STATE OF WISCONSIN.

 

SOMEWHAT IN CHICAGO AND IN

 

MICHIGAN AND MINNESOTA, BECAUSE

 

I FROM THE ONEIDA NATION THE

 

NATURAL HOMELANDS TO MY PEOPLE I

 

HAVE A STRONG CONNECTION TO THE

 

GREAT LAKES AREA HAVING MEMORIES

 

OF BEING A CHILD GROWING UP

 

THERE AND ALSO IT'S IMPORTANT

 

BECAUSE OF THE IMPORTANCE OF

 

WATER AND HOW WE NEED TO STEWARD

 

OVER WATER.

 

>> AND YOU ALSO HAVE THAT GRAMMY

 

AWARD.

 

TELL US ABOUT THE WORK THAT

 

EARNED THAT AWARD?

 

>> YEAH, WELL, YOU KNOW, GROWING

 

UP IN WISCONSIN, AND SORT OF

 

COLLABORATING WITH WONDERFUL

 

ARTISTS, YOU KNOW, LIKE HEATHER

 

AND OTHER FOLKS LIKE OUR DESIGN

 

TEAM AND THE ACTORS AND

 

PERFORMERS IN IT, I AM A

 

FLUTIST, I DO DRUMMING AND

 

SINGING AND VOCAL ROLES AND THAT

 

IS MY BACKGROUND IS IN THE WORLD

 

MUSIC WHERE I MET ARTISTS AND WE

 

TRAVELED AROUND THE WORLD DOING

 

CULTURAL EXCHANGES AND VARIOUS

 

WAYS TO TELL THE STORIES WHETHER

 

IT IS THROUGH SONG, DANCE OR

 

THEATER.

 

>> AND HEATHER WE WOULD BE

 

REMISS IF WE DID NOT ASK YOU

 

ABOUT JIM HENSON CREATOR OF THE

 

MUPPETS AND MORE.

 

AND WE HAVE A PICTURE OF YOU

 

WITH YOUR FATHER IN 1978.

 

WHAT WAS IT LIKE COMING FROM

 

SUCH A CREATIVE FAMILY?

 

>> IN THAT PARTICULAR PICTURE IS

 

FROM THE OPENING OF THE CENTER

 

FOR PUPPETRY ARTS IN ATLANTA.

 

I WAS SEVEN YEARS OLD.

 

>> AND YOUR FATHER JIM MEN SON

 

IS IN THE HENSON IS IN THE

 

MIDDLE KERMIT.

 

>> AND THAT IS MY FAMILY.

 

THERE'S FIVE SIBLINGS IN THE

 

FAMILY.

 

I GREW UP IN A GREAT FAMILY

 

CREATIVE AND MY DAD LOVED THE

 

ART FORM OF PUPPETRY, AND HE

 

SUPPORTED OTHER ARTISTS AND

 

MADE --

 

LOOK AT THAT.

 

YEAH.

 

AND SO HE LOVED THE ART FORM AND

 

ACTUALLY WAS INVOLVED IN THE

 

PUPPET COMMUNITY THAT IS

 

EXCITING THAT THIS PUPPET

 

FESTIVAL IS HIGHLIGHTING THE

 

WIDING BREADTH OF WHAT IT CAN

 

BE.

 

AND SEE ALL THE STYLES OUT

 

THERE.

 

MY DAD ABOUT ONE STYLE AND

 

BECAME FAMOUS FOR THE STYLE BUT

 

HE DID TRY WORKED OTHER STYLES

 

IN AND THEN IN HIS GENRE OF

 

PUPPETRY HE DID WORK MARIONETTES

 

IN AND OVERSIZED FULL LENGTH

 

STYLE PUPPETRY.

 

AND IT WAS A VERY CREATIVE

 

FAMILY TO GROW UP IN.

 

AND WE DID GET TO SEE HOW

 

BEAUTIFUL THE ART FORM WAS.

 

>> IS IT IN YOUR DNA?

 

WAS THERE A LOT OF PUT INDUSTRY

 

GOING ON IN THE HOUSE?

 

>> A LOT OF CREATIVITY.

 

CRAFTS.

 

HOLIDAYS WERE ABOUT PUMPKIN

 

CARVING IN EXTREME WAY AND

 

EASTER EGG DYEING WAS ELABORATE.

 

AND WHEN WENT TO VISIT MY DAD ON

 

THE SETS AND GOING TO PUPPET

 

FESTIVALS.

 

>> TY WHAT ARE SOME OF THE

 

CHALLENGES

 

CHALLENGES IN PRESENTING PUT

 

INDUSTRY TO 21ST CENTURY

 

AUDIENCES?

 

>> I THINK SOME OF THE

 

CHALLENGES ARE I GUESS SORT OF

 

UNVEILING WHAT PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT

 

MAYBE PUT INDUSTRY OR THEATER OR

 

ABOUT WHAT PEOPLE KNOW.

 

LIKE THE IDEA IS THAT SOME OF

 

THE CHALLENGES FACED ARE

 

PRESENTING PUPPETRY MAYBE IN A

 

NEW WAY AND STORIES IN A NEW WAY

 

TALKING ABOUT CROSS CULTURAL

 

LEARNING WITHIN MUSIC AND ART

 

FORMS THAT THESE THINGS HAVE

 

EXISTED FOR 500 YEARS PLUS

 

BEYOND HUMAN BEINGS THAT WE ARE

 

TALKING ABOUT ECOSYSTEMS AND

 

NATURE HAVING THEIR FORMS OF

 

PUPPETRY WHEN YOU WALKOUT INTO

 

THE WOODS AND TREES THERE ARE

 

THINGS THAT EXISTED BEFORE HUMAN

 

SPECIES EVER WALKED THE EARTH.

 

WHEN YOU TAKE A BIG CONCEPT LIKE

 

THAT AND TALK ABOUT TELLING

 

STORIES I THINK LIKE THE IDEA

 

TRYING TO GET THESE NEW IDEAS

 

ACROSS THAT HAVE EXISTED FROM

 

THE PAST.

 

>> HEATHER HENSON AND TY DEFOE

 

THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.

 

>> THANK YOU.

 

>> AND THE CHICAGO INTERNATIONAL

 

PUPPET THEATER FESTIVAL RUNS

 

THROUGH JANUARY 27TH AT MULTIPLE

 

LOCATIONS.

 

AND THERE'S MUCH MORE ON OUR

 

WEBSITE AND WE WILL BE RIGHT

 

BACK AFTER THIS.

 

>> AND THAT'S OUR SHOW FOR THIS

 

THURSDAY NIGHT.

 

STAY CONNECTED BY SIGN UP FOR

 

YOUR DAILY BRIEFING.

 

AND JOIN US TOMORROW NIGHT LIVE

 

AT 7:00 P.M. FOR A SPECIAL

 

EDITION OF THE WEEK IN REVIEW.

 

>> WE'LL BRING YOU ANALYSIS

 

FOLLOWING TOMORROW'S SENTENCING

 

OF FORMER CHICAGO COP JASON VAN

 

DYKE.

 

>> FOR ALL OF US AT "CHICAGO

 

TONIGHT" I'M BRANDIS FRIEDMAN.

 

>> AND I'M PARIS SCHUTZ AND I

 

THANK YOU FOR WATCHING.

 

GOOD NIGHT.

 

[♪♪♪]