>> PHIL, THANK YOU.

 

>> SECOND DEGREE MURDER

 

CONVICTION OF POLICE OFFICER

 

JASON VAN DYKE AS WELL AS HIS

 

CONVICTION ON 16 COUNTS OF

 

AGGRAVATED BATTERY WITH A WEAPON

 

IN THE FATAL SHOOTING OF LAQUAN

 

McDONALD HAS GENERATED DIVIDED

 

OPINION AMONG POLICE OFFICERS.

 

SOME VIEW VAN DYKE AS ACTING

 

FULLY WITHIN HIS RIGHTS WHEN

 

FACED WITH AN ARMED AND

 

POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS SUSPECT,

 

OTHERS BELIEVE HE WAS TOO QUICK

 

TO USE DEADLY FORCE.

 

HERE NOW TO DISCUSS THE TRIAL,

 

THE VERDICT AND WHAT IMPACT IT

 

MAY HAVE ON POLICING ARE THREE

 

FORMER POLICE OFFICERS.

 

BRIAN WARNER, HE IS RETIRED FROM

 

THE CPD AND FOUNDER OF THE

 

CHICAGO POLICE SURVIVORS A GROUP

 

OF OFFICERS WHO SURVIVED

 

TRAUMATIC INCIDENTS.

 

MIKE BROWN THE FORMER SOUTH

 

SUBURBAN POLICE OFFICER AND

 

OWNER OF A SECURITY AND FIREARMS

 

TRAINING AGENCY.

 

AND KIMBERLY MARSHALL, A FORMER

 

CHICAGO POLICE OFFICER WHO

 

EARLIER THIS YEAR COMPLETED A

 

PSYCHOLOGY DEGREE AND HOPES TO

 

WORK IN THE FIELD OF MENTAL

 

HEALTH.

 

WELCOME ALL OF YOU TO "CHICAGO

 

TONIGHT."

 

LET'S JUST GO DOWN THE LINE.

 

BRIAN, WHAT WENT THROUGH YOUR

 

MIND WHEN THE VERDICT WAS READ?

 

>> I THOUGHT IT WAS A

 

CONTINUATION OF THE TRAGEDY

 

BECAUSE THE TRAGEDY THAT

 

HAPPENED THAT NIGHT WAS LAQUAN

 

McDONALD WHO WAS FROM BORN TO

 

A MOTHER 13 OR 14 YEARS OLD.

 

HE WAS THROUGH A FOSTER CARE

 

SYSTEM THROUGH HIS OWN ADMISSION

 

HE STARTED DOING DRUGS.

 

THE SYSTEM FAILED HIM, HIS

 

FAMILY FAILED HIM AND THAT

 

VERDICT FAILED JASON VAN DYKE

 

BECAUSE OF POLITICS.

 

THE POLITICIANS GOT INVOLVED AND

 

EMOTION GOT INVOLVED NOW WE HAVE

 

A FATHER AND HUSBAND WHO IS

 

GOING AWAY FOR MANY, MANY YEARS

 

AND I DON'T THINK IT IS JUST.

 

>> MIKE, WHAT WENT THROUGH YOUR

 

MIND?

 

>> WELL, I KNEW THE STATE DID

 

NOT ESTABLISH ENOUGH BURDEN TO

 

MEET FIRST DEGREE MURDER.

 

BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT THE FORCE

 

USED IN THAT CASE WAS NOT

 

JUSTIFIED.

 

AND SO THERE HAS TO BE A DIVIDE

 

OR A FINE LINE BETWEEN

 

SUPPORTING POLICE ACTIONS THAT

 

ARE LAWFUL AND HAVING THE

 

COURAGE TO BE ABLE TO STATE WHEN

 

IT'S UNLAWFUL THAT WE CALL IT

 

WHAT IT IS.

 

>> YOU THOUGHT SECOND DEGREE

 

MURDER WAS FAIR AND 16 COUNTS OF

 

AGGRAVATED BATTERY WITH A WEAPON

 

FAIR?

 

>> I FOUND THE 16 COUNTS TO BE

 

ODD INVESTIGATING HOMICIDES IT

 

IS NOT THE CASE THAT PER SHOT IS

 

A CHARGE WHERE IT IS A THEORY OF

 

THE CRIME.

 

>> KIMBERLY WHAT ABOUT YOU?

 

>> I THOUGHT THAT THE VERDICT

 

WAS JUST.

 

UNFORTUNATELY FOR OFFICER VAN

 

DYKE HE MADE A VERY BAD CHOICE

 

THAT NIGHT.

 

I KNOW HIS FAMILY WILL BE

 

DEVASTATED BUT LAQUAN McDONALD

 

IS STILL DEAD.

 

AND HIS TRAGEDY OF HIS LIFE IS

 

EVEN --

 

LIKE YOU SAID --

 

IT IS TRAGIC IT IS MORE TRAGIC.

 

BUT IF HE WAS ALIVE THERE WOULD

 

BE THE POSSIBILITY HE COULD GET

 

THE HELP THAT HE NEEDS.

 

OFFICER VAN DYKE'S ACTIONS WERE

 

A TRAGIC MISTAKE.

 

>> ALL THREE OF YOU HAVE WORN A

 

SHIELD AND CARRIED A WEAPON.

 

WHAT DID YOU MAKE OF THE

 

ARGUMENT THAT OFFICER VAN DYKE

 

FIRED WHEN EVERY OTHER OFFICER

 

ON THAT SCENE DID NOT?

 

>> ONE OF THE FIRST OFFICERS ON

 

THE SCENE KEPT DESCRIBING HIM HE

 

IS FOLLOWING BEHIND LAQUAN.

 

JASON IS ONE OF THE FEW OFFICERS

 

THAT HE APPROACH AND WENT TOWARD

 

IT IS A DIFFERENCE FROM

 

FOLLOWING SOMEBODY OR TRYING TO

 

BOX SOMEBODY IN AND THE PERSON

 

IS COMING DOWN ON YOU WITH A

 

KNIFE AND REFUSING LAWFUL ORDERS

 

TO DROP THAT KNIFE HE HAS EVERY

 

RIGHT TO PROTECT HIMSELF BYLAW

 

AND HIS TRAINING.

 

TO CHASTISE HIM AND VILIFY THE

 

POLICE AND HANDOUT $5 MILLION OF

 

OUR TAX DOLLARS TO A CRIMINAL,

 

IT IS UNFORTUNATE.

 

AND THAT HAS TO STOP.

 

THERE ARE SO MANY TIMES WE

 

HANDOUT MONEY --

 

>> BEFORE WE GET TO THE MONEY.

 

THE BUSINESS THAT NO OTHER

 

OFFICER FIRED.

 

IS THAT A REASONABLE ARGUMENT?

 

>> THAT IS A VERY REASONABLE

 

ARGUMENT AND THERE IS ANOTHER

 

ARGUMENT IN USE OF FORCE

 

TRAINING CALLED OFFICER INDUCED

 

JEOPARDY.

 

GIVEN ALL THE OFFICERS WERE

 

TRAINED AT THE ACADEMY, THE

 

QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS WHAT IF

 

ANYTHING MADE JASON VAN DYKE

 

FIRE THAT DID NOT MAKE THE OTHER

 

OFFICERS FIRE?

 

WE CAN ARGUE HIS PARTNER

 

INJECTED HIM INTO A SITUATION

 

THAT MIGHT HAVE CREATED THAT

 

LEVEL BUT THEN WHERE IS THE

 

RESTRAINT?

 

AND WE SEE THE VIDEO WE CANNOT

 

ACCURATELY MEASURE DISTANCE BUT

 

I'M NOT GOING TO ARGUE HE WAS IN

 

IMMINENT FEAR OF LOSING HIS LIFE

 

AT THAT MOMENT IN TIME.

 

>> AND KIMBERLY YOU AGREE?

 

>> I AGREE WITH MIKE.

 

DEADLY FORCE IS JUST THAT.

 

IT IS TO PROTECT LIFE.

 

IT IS TO PROTECT YOUR LIFE OR

 

THE LIFE OF SOMEONE ELSE.

 

THAT YOU FEEL THIS PERSON WILL

 

KILL.

 

WE HAVE A USE OF FORCE MODEL

 

THAT STATES WHEN A PERSON IS

 

INSIDE YOUR ENVELOPE THAT IS

 

WHEN YOUR LIFE IS IN DANGER.

 

THAT IS WHEN YOUR LIFE IS

 

THREATENED AND THAT IS WHEN

 

DEADLY FORCE THAT IS WHAT I WAS

 

TAUGHT WHEN DEADLY FORCE IS

 

USED.

 

I DID NOT SEE ON THE TAPE WHERE

 

VAN DYKE AND LAQUAN McDONALD

 

WERE CLOSE ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY BE

 

A VIABLE THREAT.

 

HE HAD OTHER OPTIONS.

 

HE COULD HAVE RETREATED.

 

>> BRIAN YOU SAW SOMETHING

 

DIFFERENT?

 

>> I DID.

 

IT WAS MEASURED THE DISTANCE

 

CAME TO ABOUT 13 FEET.

 

AND YOU STATE A LOT OF FACTS IN

 

TRAINING, AND YOU KNOW 21-FOOT

 

RULE.

 

THE 21-FOOT RULE WAS VIOLATED.

 

>> AND THE 21-FOOT RULE IS THAT

 

IN A MATTER OF SECONDS A SUSPECT

 

CAN SEPARATE THE DISTANCE OF 21

 

FEET?

 

>> YES.

 

THE 21-FOOT RULE IS BY THE TIME

 

THE BRAIN BEGINS TO RECOGNIZE

 

THAT THERE IS A THREAT YOU DON'T

 

HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO BE ABLE TO

 

REACT TO THE THREAT BY THE TIME

 

YOU BEGIN TO REACT YOU ARE

 

STABBED.

 

SO --

 

>> REACTION IS SLOWER THAN

 

ACTION.

 

LAW ENFORCEMENT AND BEING

 

TRAINED TO KNOW THIS ATTACK IS

 

COMING UPON HIM HE FELT AN

 

IMMINENT THREAT AND TOOK ACTION.

 

>> WHAT IMPACT IS THIS VERDICT

 

HAVING ON THE STREET?

 

YOU ALL, ALL THREE OF YOU ARE

 

RETIRED AND YOU TALK TO YOUR

 

FELLOW OFFICERS YOUR COLLEAGUES

 

ALL THE TIME.

 

WHAT IS HAPPENING ON THE STREET?

 

>> ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I

 

WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT IS THAT

 

DURING THAT SAME WEEK THAT THE

 

VAN DYKE VERDICT CAME OUT, THERE

 

WAS A SHOOTING IN SOUTH

 

CAROLINA.

 

SEVEN POLICE OFFICERS, ONE DEAD

 

ON THE SCENE.

 

AND THAT OFFENDER WAS TAKEN

 

ALIVE.

 

>> YOU KNOW WHY HE WAS TAKEN

 

ALIVE?

 

BECAUSE HE GAVE UP AND DROPPED

 

HIS WEAPON.

 

HAD LAQUAN McDONALD DROPPED

 

HIS KNIFE HE MAY BE ALIVE.

 

YOU ARE TALKING APPLES AND

 

ORANGES.

 

>> NO, I'M TALKING ABOUT THE

 

TIME THAT THEY WAITED TO

 

NEGOTIATE AND TO MAKE SURE THAT

 

THAT PERSON WAS TAKEN ALIVE.

 

>> IT WAS AN ONGOING ESCALATING

 

SITUATION.

 

HE SHOWED HIS ABILITY TO USE THE

 

KNIFE ON THE GENTLEMAN AT THE

 

YARD.

 

HE SHOWED HIS ABILITY TO USE THE

 

KNIFE ON A SQUAD CAR HOW MUCH

 

MORE ARE WE SUPPOSED TO GIVE

 

HIM?

 

>> BACK TO TODAY AND ON THE

 

STREET AND OFFICERS TODAY WHAT

 

IS THE EFFECT OF THIS VERDICT ON

 

THEM?

 

>> MORE IMPORTANTLY, I THINK YOU

 

SAW IT IN ENGLEWOOD YESTERDAY

 

WHEN THE PEOPLE PULLED THE

 

OFFICERS INTO THE APARTMENT AND

 

WANTED TO LOCK THE DOOR AND BEAT

 

THEM BECAUSE NOW THEY ARE MORE

 

BRAZEN BECAUSE THIS IS THE

 

ENVIRONMENT WE ARE CREATING.

 

>> I AGREE WITH THAT PEOPLE ARE

 

GETTING MORE BRAZEN WHEN THEY

 

ATTACK THE POLICE.

 

SO --

 

WHAT IS HAPPENING --

 

>> IS THAT THE EFFECT OF THE

 

VERDICT?

 

>> NOT JUST THE VERDICT BUT THE

 

FERGUSON EFFECT AFTER FERGUSON

 

AND THEN THE SITUATION INVOLVING

 

DARREN WILSON AND THE UNFAIR

 

CONVERSATION ABOUT WHAT THE

 

POLICE CAN DO AND WHAT THEY NEED

 

TO REFORM AND NOT THE

 

CONVERSATION THAT NEEDS TO

 

HAPPEN IN OUR COMMUNITIES.

 

NOW YOU ARE HAVING OFFICERS WHO

 

ARE SELFLESS PERSONS WE RUN

 

TOWARDS GUNFIRE WE DON'T THINK

 

ABOUT OUR FAMILIES AT THAT TIME

 

NOW YOU ARE BEGINNING TO THINK

 

ABOUT FAMILIES AND PENSIONS

 

BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT TO BE

 

VILIFIED FOR DOING THE RIGHT

 

THING AND LOSE YOUR JOB AND YOUR

 

WELL-BEING AS WELL.

 

>> WHERE DOES RACE COME IN THIS

 

CONVERSATION?

 

>> RACE IS IMPORTANT PART OF ALL

 

LAW ENFORCEMENT.

 

BUT I'M SURE YOU'VE SAT IN THE

 

SAME SQUAD CAR I'VE HEARD A LOT

 

OF CHATTER ON THE POLICE RADIO I

 

HAVE NEVER HEARD AN OFFICER SAY

 

SQUAD IS THAT OFFENDER BLACK OR

 

WHITE?

 

YOU ARE OUT THERE LOOKING FOR

 

THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PERSON

 

GIVEN TO YOU.

 

AND FERGUSON DID A DISSERVICE.

 

>> THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE

 

CITY OF CHICAGO.

 

>> NO, JOE McMAHON WHEN HE IN

 

HIS OPENING REMARKS SAID THIS

 

WAS A BLACK BOY WHO HAD THE

 

AUDACITY TO WALK PAST A

 

POLICEMAN AND THAT IS WHY HE WAS

 

SHOT.

 

THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF

 

EVIDENCE TO SAY RACE HAD

 

ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS.

 

I AGREE, I DON'T SEE THAT RACE

 

PLAYED A FACTOR IN THE DECISION

 

TO USE FORCE.

 

I DISAGREE WITH THE FORCE, I

 

CANNOT HONESTLY STATE THAT RACE

 

PLAYED A FACTOR.

 

>> KIMBERLY?

 

>> I HAVE TO SAY THAT WHEN WE

 

LOOK AT MASS SHOOTERS AND SCHOOL

 

SHOOTERS AND THE AMOUNT OF THEM

 

THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN ALIVE,

 

WITHOUT BEING KILLED, DYLAN

 

ROOF --

 

>> DID RACE PLAY A ROLE IN THIS?

 

>> IT SEEMS TO ME THAT IF THIS

 

PERSON THAT IS DOING THE

 

SHOOTING HAS BEEN WHITE IN THE

 

PAST, HE IS TAKEN ALIVE.

 

TOO MANY TIMES I'VE SEEN UNARMED

 

AND LIKE LAQUAN BLACK PEOPLE

 

THAT ARE NOT TAKEN ALIVE.

 

SO IS THAT ABOUT RACE?

 

>> ROOF, YOU GAVE ANOTHER

 

EXAMPLE OF A GUY WHO KILLED ALL

 

THESE PEOPLE, PULLED OVER BY THE

 

POLICE AND PUTS HIS HANDS OUT

 

THE WINDOW AND GIVES UP.

 

HAD LAQUAN DONE THAT COMPLIANCE

 

IS SO IMPORTANT WE HAVE TO PUT

 

RESPONSIBILITY IN THE COMMUNITY

 

AND IN THE OFFENDERRERS AND STOP

 

REWARDING THEM FOR BAD BEHAVIOR.

 

>> I DON'T THINK THAT HIM BEING

 

KILLED WAS A REWARD FOR HIS BAD

 

BEHAVIOR.

 

[INAUDIBLE]

 

>> I THINK THAT.

 

>> WAS HE BREAKING THE LAW?

 

WAS HE HIGH ON DRUGS?

 

IS THAT GOOD BEHAVIOR?

 

>> BRIAN, I'M NOT --

 

I DON'T WANT TO VOLLEY WITH YOU

 

ON THAT LEVEL.

 

WHAT I'M SAYING TO YOU IS

 

THIS...

 

INDIVIDUAL POLICE OFFICERS THAT

 

THE MAKE THE DECISION TO USE

 

DEADLY FORCE HAVE TO HAVE

 

EXHAUSTED ALL OTHER MEASURES.

 

>> AND THAT IS WHERE WE'RE GOING

 

TO STOP THE CONVERSATION FOR

 

NOW.

 

BUT THIS CONVERSATION WILL

 

CONTINUE.

 

AND WE HAVE A SENTENCE YET TO

 

SEE.

 

AND MUCH MORE TO DISCUSS AND WE