THAT HUNGER STRIKE LASTED 19

 

DAYS.

 

>>> WOULD YOU LET YOUR CAR

 

INSURANCE COMPANY GATHER DATA

 

WHILE YOU DRIVE.

 

NORTH BROOK BASED ALLSTATE IS

 

GRANTED TWO PATENTS THAT COULD

 

ALLOW THE COMPANY TO GAERM A

 

LOT OF INFORMATION ABOUT YOU.

 

THINGS LIKE WHAT YOUR HEART

 

RATE IS WHILE I DRIVE OR

 

WHETHER DISTRICTED BY SOMETHING

 

IN THE GAR CAR.

 

IT COULD POTENTIALLY KEEP AN

 

EYE ON CARS AROUND YOU AND BELL

 

ON THE STREETS.

 

AND THE COMPANY SAYS ANY NEW

 

DATA COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY

 

WOULD BE TO IMPROVE DRIVER

 

SAFETY.

 

BUT, SOME WORRY IT'S

 

UNNECESSARY ENVISION OF

 

PRIVACY. JOIN IS US TO TALK

 

ABOUT THAT CHICAGO TRIBUNE

 

REPORTER BECKY YEREK COVERING

 

THE STORY AND DONE FWRIV

 

INVICE-PRESIDENT OF PROPERTY

 

CASUALTY INSURANCE PROPERTY

 

CASUALTY INSURERS ASSOCIATION

 

OF AMERICA BASED HERE IN

 

CHICAGO AND HAROLD CEN TEEN ON

 

CHICAGO IAA COOL SCHOOL OF LAW.

 

ON THE PATENT ALLSTATE WAS

 

FWRAPTED MORE ON WHAT THE

 

PATENTS WOULD ALLOW ALLSTATE TO

 

DO.

 

>> WHAT'S SO INTERESTING ABOUT

 

THESE PATENTS IT'S REALLY JUST

 

A FEW THINGS.

 

FIRST OF ALL THEY GOT ONE IN

 

JUNE THAT ENVISIONED SELLING

 

THIS DRIVING DATA TO OTHER

 

COMPANIES LIKE BANKS,

 

MARKETERS, HEALTH INSURANCE

 

COMPANIES.

 

THEY THINK THIS DATA COULD BE

 

USEFUL FOR OTHER COMPANIES.

 

THAT'S ONE ELEMENT OF IT AND

 

SECOND ELEMENT OF IT THEY'RE

 

NOT JUST INTERESTED IN HOW YOU

 

DRIVE.

 

NOW THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT --

 

>> HOW FAST YOU GO.

 

>> HOW FAST YOU GO.

 

>> WHETHER YOU SGLAIK WHETHER

 

YOU BRAKE A LOT OF WHAT TYPE VL

 

DAY YOU DRIVE.

 

YOUR MILEAGE.

 

THAT IS TYPICALLY THE KIND OF

 

THINGS THEY'VE BEEN INTERESTED

 

N NOW THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT

 

GATHERING PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA

 

LIKE HAVING SENSORS ON STEERING

 

WHEELS THAT COULD TELL THINGS

 

ABOUT YOUR HEART RATE.

 

AND LASTLY, THE THIRD

 

INTERESTING PART THEY JUST GOT

 

A PATENT FOR IT WOULD BE

 

WATCHING OTHER DRIVERS AS WELL

 

AS STUFF NOT RELATED TOIVE

 

DR. ING IN THE CAR.

 

LIKE HOW MANY PASSENGERS ARE

 

THERE.

 

ARE THERE KIDS.

 

ARE YOU EATING?

 

ARE YOU TALKING ON THE PHONE?

 

AND HOW ARE PEOPLE AROUND YOU

 

DRIVING?

 

ARE THERE PEDESTRIANS?

 

>> DON GRIFFIN WHY WOULD

 

ALLSTATE BE INTERESTED IN

 

GETTING THIS KIND OF DATA THAT

 

IS NOT JUST TO DO WITH WHO IS

 

IN THE CAR BUT DRIVERS AROUND

 

THEM AND SO FORTH.

 

>> THERE'S A COUPLE REASONS IF

 

YOU THINK ABOUT T. WE ARE IN A

 

VERY, VERY COMPETITIVE MARKET

 

FOR AUTO INSURANCE.

 

SO COMPANIES ARE TRYING TO

 

FIGURE OUT HOW THEY CAN BEST

 

POSITION THEMSELVES AND GET A

 

LEG UP ON PERHAPS ANOTHER

 

COMPETITOR.

 

AND ONE OF THE WAYS TOU DO

 

THAT.

 

>> BY THE WAY YOUR ASSOCIATION

 

REPRESENTS INSURANCE COMPANIES

 

AND ALLSTATE HAPPENS NOT TO BE

 

A MEMBER.

 

>> CORRECT.

 

>> SO COMPANIES GATHER THIS

 

DATA.

 

THERE'S A COUPLE GOOD REASONS.

 

THINK WANT TO BE ABLE TO OFFER

 

COMPETITIVE PRODUCT.

 

ONE OF THE THINGS THEY CAN DO

 

IS ANYTHING THEY CAN FIND OUT

 

THAT WOULD HELP GET YOU THE

 

RIGHT PRICE SO AK TU AIRILY PAY

 

THE RISK SO YOU'RE NOT PAYING

 

THE RISK OF SOMEBODY ELSE AND

 

HOW THEY DRIVE IS GOOD

 

INFORMATION.

 

ANYTHING TO IMPROVE THE SAFETY.

 

IF YOU GOT THREE OR FOUR KIDS

 

IN THE CAR PERHAPS THEY'RE

 

CREATING DISTRACTION AND THAT

 

MAY BE SOMETHING THAT TAIDZ YOU

 

CAUSES YOU TO TAKE EYES OFF

 

FOCUS OF DRIVER.

 

>> I'M SURE THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN

 

TO A PARENT.

 

>> OF COURSE NOT, NOT ANY OF

 

US.

 

ANYWAY, THERE ARE REASONS TO DO

 

THAT.

 

AND THEN, WHAT YOU TRY TO DO IS

 

FIGURE OUT, ARE THERE BEHAVIORS

 

THAT YOU CAN CHANGE BY DOING

 

COLLECTING SOME THIS DATA.

 

AND WHAT WE'VE LEARNED OVER THE

 

YEARS IS SOME OF THE DATA

 

THAT'S BEEN COLLECTED FROM

 

PEOPLE AS THEY DRIVE.

 

AND WHEN THEY DRIVE.

 

AND HOW FAST THEY DRIVE.

 

IT'S ACTUALLY BEEN USED TO

 

IMPROVE THE DRIVER'S SAFETY.

 

PEOPLE HAVE ACTUALLY CHANGED

 

DRIVING HABITS BECAUSE THEY GET

 

DISCOUNTS IF THEY ACTUALLY

 

DRIVE BETTER AND SAFER AND THEN

 

IT'S ALSO A THING WITH CAR

 

MANUFACTURERS THEY PRIOR PUT

 

MORE AND MORE IN CRASH

 

AVOIDANCE TECHNOLOGY IN THEIR

 

VEHICLES.

 

>> LET'S SWITCH TO HAROLD CENT.

 

PRIVACY CONCERNS HAROLD J.

 

KRENT, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOT

 

JUST HOW ONE DRIVES, BRAKING,

 

SWERVEER, BUT PHYSIOLOGICAL

 

FACTORS LIKE HEAT RATE AND HOW

 

BLOOD PRESSURE AND THAT SORT OF

 

THING.

 

>> FIRST OF ALL, A AGREE WITH

 

DON THAT TECHNOLOGY CAN BE

 

HELPFUL IN TERMS OF INCREASING

 

SAFETY.

 

AND THAT'S REALLY WHAT ALL

 

GOOGLE DRIVERLESS CAR IS ALL

 

ABOUT AND IT'S IMPORTANT IN

 

TERMS OF TRYING TO PREDICATE

 

THE RIGHT RISK PROFILE FOR

 

INDIVIDUAL DRIVER.

 

SO FAR SO GOOD.

 

THE QUESTION WHAT WILL BE DONE

 

WITH THE DATA.

 

WILL IT BE SOLD AS YOU

 

SUGGESTED AND BECKY SUGGESTED

 

TO INSURANCE COMPANIES, HEALTH

 

INSURANCE COMPANIES OR BANKS.

 

AND WILL YOU GET THE

 

INFORMATION OF UNWITNESSING

 

PASSENGER ALSO INVOLVED IN THIS

 

DATA COMPILATION AND WHAT ABOUT

 

BYSTANDER ON THE STREET OR

 

ABOUT DRIVER IN ANOTHER CAR.

 

WHAT HAPPENS WITH THAT

 

INFORMATION.

 

WHO WILL BE GIVEN TO BE.

 

PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYERS.

 

LOOKING AT RISK FACTORS AND NOT

 

WANT TO HIRE SOMEBODY.

 

ALL THIS INVOLVED.

 

ANYBODY THAT USES PATENTS

 

WHETHER ALLSTATE OR SOMEONE

 

ELSE SHOULD COME ONE CLEAR

 

POLICIES ABOUT WHAT IT WILL USE

 

THE INFORMATION FOR.

 

IT'S OKAY IF IT'S FOR SAFETY

 

BUT YOU PACKAGE TO TO HEALTH

 

INSURANCE COMPANIES I THINK A

 

LOT OF US WOULD BALK.

 

>> BECK YES, I LET ME GO TO

 

BECKY.

 

DIDN'T THE ALLSTATE CEO SAY

 

SOMETHING ABOUT OR SUGGEST OR

 

IMPLY THAT SELLING THIS DATA

 

MIGHT BE A POSSIBILITY?

 

>> OH, YEAH THEY SAID THAT A

 

FEW MONTHS AGO HE WAS AT A

 

CONFERENCE AND SAYS IT'S SORT

 

OF THE SAME THING GOOGLE DOES.

 

AND SO HE FLOATED THIS A FEW

 

MONTHS AGO WHERE HE SAID WE

 

MIGHT ENVISION SELLING THIS

 

DRIVING DATA SOME DAY AND THEN

 

IN JUNE THEY RECEIVED THIS

 

PATENTS THAT SORT OF LAYS OUT

 

THE POTENTIAL OF SELLING THIS

 

DRIVING DATA TO DIFFERENT

 

INDUSTRIES.

 

>> SUCH AS?

 

>> SUCH AS HEALTH INSURANCE

 

COMPANIES, BANKS, MARKETING

 

COMPANIES, THEIR REASONING IS,

 

WELL, MAYBE IF SOMEBODY IS

 

AGGRESSIVE DRIVER THEY'LL BE

 

AGGRESSIVE HOW THEY HANDLE

 

MONEY.

 

>> HOW ABOUT THAT, DON GRIFFIN.

 

YOU HEAR CONCERNS.

 

THEY SEEM LEGITIMATE.

 

>> YES, YOU KNOW SOCIETY HAS TO

 

DECIDE AND COME ONE WHAT THE

 

BALANCE SHOULD BE BETWEEN HOW

 

MUCH DATA IS OUT THERE AND WHAT

 

CAN BE DONE WITH IT.

 

AND THE COMPANIES THAT ARE

 

INVOLVED WOULD NEED TO DISCLOSE

 

TO THE POLICY HOLDER OR

 

POTENTIAL PURCHASER OF THIS

 

TYPE OF PRODUCT THAT THEY'RE

 

ACTUALLY GOING TO BE COLLECTING

 

THAT DATA AND AS HAROLD TALKED

 

ABOUT.

 

>> GOOGLE DOES THAT TOO.

 

>> AND HOW THEY ACTUALLY --

 

>> SEVERAL PAGES OF FINE PRINT.

 

>> RIGHT.

 

>> AND I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE

 

ARE SIGNED UP FOR GOOGLE OR G

 

MAIL PROBABLY DON'T READ IT.

 

>> NOT AS MUCH AS THEY SHOULD.

 

THE DISCLOSURE WOULD HAVE TO BE

 

HERE AND PEOPLE WOULD NEED TO

 

BE AWARE THIS IS WHAT THE DATA

 

IS USED FOR AND SELLING OF IT

 

TO OTHER ENTITIES THAT GOVRPD

 

BY SHARING THIRD PARTIES AND BY

 

GRIM REACH BLUELY A FEDERAL LAW

 

AND YOU CAN ONLY DO THAT IN

 

CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND IT

 

HAS TO BE KNOWN AHEAD OF TIME

 

AND FOLKS HAVE TO BE AER WHAT

 

OF IT AND THE OTHER PIECE IS

 

WHEN YOU GET TO THE PEOPLE

 

AROUND THE CAR, YOU KNOW, ONE

 

OF THE THINGS THAT WOULD BE

 

HELPFUL AS FAR AS SAFETY AND

 

THEN AGAIN YOU HAVE TO BE VERY

 

CLEAR ON HOW IT WOULD DIVIDE

 

OUT AND WHO WOULD GET DATA WIN

 

BUT ONE OF THE THINGS TO HELP

 

IMPROVE SAFETY IS TO SEE WHAT

 

ACTUALLY HAPPENED IN THE

 

ACCIDENT.

 

AND IF THE CAMERAS PART OF THE

 

CAR CAN ACTUALLY SHOW THAT AND

 

THAT DATA CAN BE USED WITH THE

 

OWNER'S PERMISSION AND PEOPLE

 

INVOLVED IN THE ACCIDENT THEN

 

THAT MIGHT GO A LOT FURTHER TO

 

HELPING SOLVE THE CIRCUMSTANCES

 

OF THE ACCIDENT AND PAYING FOR

 

THE CLAIM.

 

>> BECAUSE BECKY THE PATENT NOT

 

JUST PERCEIVES THE POSSIBILITY

 

OF SENSORS ON STEERING WHEEL

 

AND SO FORTH AND ALSO CAMERAS

 

AS WELL.

 

>> CAMERAS AND ALSO AUDIO.

 

SO IF YOU WERE HAVING A REALLY

 

ANIMATED DISCUSSION OR IF I

 

WERE PLAYING THE STEREO VERY

 

CLOUDY THE PATENT DOES MENTION

 

AUDIO.

 

>> WHO CAN GET ACCESS THOSE

 

CONVERSATIONS THAT YOU'RE

 

TAKING PLACE RIGHT AND THAT'S

 

DIFFICULTY.

 

WE DON'T WANT PEOPLE LISTENING

 

IN SAYING WHAT WERE YOU DOING

 

ON KHETFIELD DRIVE WHAT WERE

 

YOU TALKING ABOUT AND SAY TO

 

YOUR KIDS OR SAY TO YOUR

 

PARTNER OR WIFE.

 

LET'S -- ALLSTATE ISSUED A

 

STATEMENT LET'S TAKE A LOOK

 

WHAT THE THEY SAID.

 

AS PART OF ALLSTATE'S

 

COMMITMENT TO LEVERAGE

 

INNOVATIONS TO IMPROVE DRIVER

 

SAFETY WE FILED THIS PATENT FOR

 

PROSPECTIVE PATENT AWARENESS

 

TECHNOLOGY SA FEW YEARS AGO.

 

IT WOULD PROVIDE DRIVERS WITH

 

TRAFFIC AND EXTERNAL FACTORS TO

 

HELP THEM DRIVE SAVE.

 

HAROLD J. KRENT ALL THIS IS

 

VOLUNTARY.

 

A DRIVER WOULD HAVE TO SAY,

 

YES, I AGREE TO THIS.

 

AND EXCHANGE FOR MAYBE BETTER

 

RATES AND SO FORTH.

 

IF IT'S VOLUNTARY AND YOU'RE

 

CONSENTING TO THE SENSORS AND

 

CAMERAS AND SO FORTH WHAT'S THE

 

PROBLEM.

 

>> NOT VOLUNTARY WITH PASSENGER

 

AND NOT VOLUNTARY WITH

 

BYSTANDERS AND NOT VOLUNTARY

 

WITH DRIVERS OF CARS THAT

 

HAPPEN TO CROSS THE PATH OF THE

 

INSURED.

 

THAT'S THE THE DIFFICULTY.

 

RIGHT?

 

ONE CAN GIVEAWAY ONE'S OWN

 

PRIVACY WHETHER YOU GET A TEE

 

SHIRT AT A SPORTS FESTIVAL OR

 

IT'S HARD TO GIVEAWAY SOMEBODY

 

ELSE'S PRIVACY. THAT'S THE

 

DANGER INNERNT THIS PARTICULAR

 

PATENTS THAT THEY HAVE TO BE

 

CAREFUL FOR WHOEVER

 

OPERATIONALIZE IT'S.

 

>> DON GRIFFIN GIVE ME EXAMPLE

 

OF INCENTIVES.

 

SOME PROGRAMS ALREADY EXIST.

 

WHAT EXISTS RIGHT NOW IN TERMS

 

OF WHAT SLURNS COMPANIES CAN

 

GATHER WITH DRIVER'S CONSENT.

 

>> WITH DRIVER'S CONSENT

 

THEY'RE GATHERING USAGE BASED

 

DATA NOW.

 

>> WHAT DOES THAT MEAN.

 

>> WHEN YOU DRIVE, WHERE YOU

 

DRIVE, HOW FAST, WHAT TIME OF

 

DAY AND WHETHER YOU'RE

 

EXCEEDING THE SPEED LIMIT,

 

WHETHER YOU'RE BRAKING HARD OR

 

SWERVING AS BECKY TALKED ABOUT

 

AND SO THE DISCOUNTS FROM THAT

 

CAN GET YOU 10 TO 30% OR MORE.

 

>> SO THEY CAN BE SIGNIFICANT.

 

>> YES THEY CAN.

 

AND IDEA BEHIND THAT IS TO HELP

 

THEM GET A BETTER PICTURE AND

 

CHARGE YOU A BETTER RATE BISSED

 

ON HOW YOU DRIVE.

 

BECAUSE THOSE ARE INDIVIDUALS

 

RISK FACTORS YOU V AND SO

 

COMPANIES HAVE STARTED TO

 

TAYLOR THESE PRODUCTS AND

 

THAT'S WHAT WE'LL SEE MORE OF

 

AS WE USE DATA IN THE INDUSTRY

 

TO THE EXTENT WE'RE ALLOWED TO

 

TO AVOID PRIVACY ISSUES WE WILL

 

PROBABLY SEE A LOT MORE

 

DEVELOPMENT OF THIS KIND OF

 

PRODUCT THROUGHOUT THE INDUSTRY

 

BECAUSE AGAIN EVERYBODY IS OUT

 

THERE FOR COMPETING FOR THE

 

CUSTOMER.

 

>> DON GRIFFIN LET ME ASK YOU

 

THIS YOU CITE EXAMPLES SOMEBODY

 

IS DRIVING GOOD DON'T SWERVE,

 

BREAK BRAKE, SO FORTH RAETS GO

 

DOWN.

 

>> IS REVERSE TRUE.

 

>> ABSOLUTELY.

 

>> AND THAT'S WHY THEY TRY TO

 

DO.

 

THEY USE THAT INFORMATION TO

 

HELP IMPROVE THOSE DRIVERS THAT

 

MAY HAVE SOME ADVERSE ACTIONS

 

THAT THEY'VE TAKEN AND HOW THEY

 

DRIVE.

 

>> AND BECKY, MY UNDERSTANDING,

 

THERE'S BEEN CONCERNS ABOUT THE

 

DEGREE TO WHICH SOMEONE CAN

 

ACTUALLY GIVE CONSENT FOR THEIR

 

OWN PERSON AS OPPOSED TO

 

OTHERS.

 

WHAT IS THE ARGUMENT THERE IN

 

TERMS OF WHETHER OR NOT THESE

 

INCENTIVES ARE SO STRONG THAT

 

ONE DOESN'T REALLY HAVE

 

CONSENT.

 

YOU CAN AMPLIFY ON THAT?

 

>> IT MAY BE WHAT A LOT OF US

 

FACE WHEN WE HAVE TO SIGN

 

SOMETHING SAYING TO USE THIS

 

SERVICE YOU HAVE TO CONSENT TO

 

X, Y, Z.

 

SO REALLY IT DOES BECOME KINDS

 

OF COERCIVE.

 

AND SO I MEAN WE DON'T REALLY

 

KNOW.

 

>> HAROLD, GEOFF ME EXAMPLE OF

 

WORST CASE SCENARIO SAY

 

SOMEBODY IS GATHERING

 

INFORMATION ON DRIVER AND

 

MEASURING BLOOD PRESSURE AND

 

HER HEART RATE AND SO FORTH AND

 

CAMERAS ALL AROUND AN THAT SORT

 

OF THING, GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF

 

SOMETHING BAD THAT COULD HAPPEN

 

YOU.

 

>> CLEARLY KNOW WE'VE SEEN THIS

 

ALL AROUND SOMEBODY COULD HACK

 

INTO THAT DATABASE AND POST ALL

 

PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR

 

ANYBODY TO SEE AND NOBODY

 

WHANTS TO KNOW THEIR BLOOD

 

ALCOHOL LEFT OR HEART RATE OR

 

BLOOD PRESSURE FOR ANYBODY TO

 

LOOK AT.

 

THAT'S ONE ISSUE.

 

EVEN MORE IMPORTANT I THINK IS

 

QUESTION OF YOU DON'T WANT

 

PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS S OR ANY

 

KIND OF PRIVATE CONDUCT WITH

 

KIDS IN CAR OR NOT TO BE

 

SUBJECT TO ANY KIND OF SECOND

 

GETTING BY YOUR EMPLOYER OR

 

HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY AND

 

NOT TO MENTION JUST AN

 

INTERESTED NEIGHBOR.

 

>> HOW ABOUT THE WHOLE ISSUE OF

 

THE CONVERSATIONS BEING

 

RECORDED, HOW WOULD ONE PROTECT

 

THAT FROM BEING ABUSED.

 

>> I THINK THAT'S A KEY PIECE

 

OF IT HOW YOU WOULD STRUCTURE

 

THE POLICY SO THATLE ONLY THING

 

THAT WOULD PROBABLY BE USED IN

 

THAT PARTICULAR INSTANCE WOULD

 

BE IF THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT

 

LATER.

 

AND SO IF YOU -- IF THERE WAS

 

SOMETHING GOING ON IN THE CAR

 

AND THAT CAUSED SOMEBODY TO

 

TURN THEIR HEAD PERHAPS AND

 

SPEAK TO A CHILD AND THAT TAKES

 

YOUR EYES OFF THE ROAD, THAT'S

 

SOMETHING THAT PROBABLY THE

 

INDUSTRY WOULD HOPE THAT WE

 

WOULD BE ABLE TO USE AT SOME

 

POINT.

 

>> HOW DO YOU MAKE THE PITCH TO

 

CONSUME THERZ IS AGOOD THING?

 

>> THE WHOLE IDEA BEHIND IS IS

 

TO GETS THE CONSUME ARE A

 

BETTER PRICE AND GET THEM TO

 

PAY WHAT THEY THINK THEY SHOULD

 

FOR THE RISK THAT THEY PRESENT

 

TO THE INSURANCE COMPANY.

 

AND NO MORE THAN THAT.

 

>> IS IT POSSIBLE THE ONLY

 

PEOPLE GOING TO VOLUNTEER FOR

 

THIS ARE THE LARGEST GROUP ARE

 

PEOPLE WHO ARE GOOD DRIVERS AND

 

PEOPLE WHO ARE ERRATIC DRIVERS

 

MAY SA NO THANK SFWLU THAT MAY

 

BE THE CASE.

 

AND THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS.

 

AS YOU POINTED OUT, PEOPLE HAVE

 

THE CHOICE.

 

AND THEY HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY

 

TO BUY FROM A COMPANY OR NOT

 

DEPENDING WHERE TO BUY THIS

 

PARTICULAR PRODUCT BECAUSE THE

 

COMPANY MAY HAVE OTHER PRODUCTS

 

THAT THEY USE.