COMPLICATED PICTURE OF A DARK

 

TIME.

 

A NEW TRUMP ADMINISTRATION RULE

 

CHANGE COULD LEAVE HUNDREDS OF

 

THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WITHOUT FOOD

 

STAMP BENEFITS.

 

THE DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE SAYS

 

THEY WILL TIGHT ESPECIALLY WORK

 

REQUIREMENTS FOR SOME RECIPIENTS

 

OF THE SNAP PROGRAM.

 

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SAYS

 

THE CHANGE WILL SAVE THE FEDERAL

 

GOVERNMENT BILLIONS BUT

 

ACTIVISTS AND POLITICIANS CALLED

 

THIS DECISION CRUEL AND UNFAIR.

 

HERE TO WEIGH-IN ARE NOLAN

 

DOWNEY A STAFF ATTORNEY ON

 

POVERTY LAW OPPOSING THE NEW

 

REQUIREMENTS AND TED DABROWSKI

 

PRESIDENT OF THE WIREPOINTS

 

WEBSITE WHO IS SUPPORTIVE OF

 

THIS RULE CHANGE.

 

WELCOME BOTH OF YOU TO "CHICAGO

 

TONIGHT."

 

NOLAN DOWNEY FIRST, A PRIMER.

 

WHO IS ELIGIBLE RIGHT NOW FOR

 

FOOD STAMPS AND WHAT ARE THE

 

BENEFITS THAT THEY GET?

 

>> WELL, PARIS, TO BE ELIGIBLE

 

FOR FOOD STAMPS YOU HAVE TO MEET

 

INCOME REQUIREMENTS, RIGHT NOW

 

IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS FOR

 

HOUSEHOLDS THAT DO NOT HAVE A

 

QUALIFYING MEMBER SOMEBODY OVER

 

60 OR SOME THAT IS STRUGGLING

 

WITH A DISABILITY THEY HAVE TO

 

BE 165% OF THE POVERTY LINE FOR

 

HOUSEHOLDS THAT DO HAVE THE

 

QUALIFYING MEMBERS THEY HAVE TO

 

BE 200 POVERTY OVER THE POVERTY

 

LINE.

 

THE FOLKS ABLE-BODIED WOULD HAVE

 

TO BE BELOW THE 165%.

 

IT'S IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT

 

SNAP BENEFITS THAT PEOPLE GET ON

 

AVERAGE ARE ABOUT $127 A MONTH

 

FOR BENEFIT RECIPIENTS.

 

THE MAXIMUM THAT A SINGLE PERSON

 

CAN GET ARE $194.

 

THESE ARE BENEFITS THAT HELP

 

PEOPLE SUPPLEMENT THEIR FOOD

 

BUDGETS BUT IT IS NOT ENOUGH FOR

 

THEM TO GET BY ON A DAY-TO-DAY

 

BASIS.

 

>> ABLED BODIED ADULTS WITH NO

 

DEPENDENTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY

 

THE CHANGE.

 

WHAT IS GOING TO CHANGE UNDER

 

THIS PROPOSAL?

 

>> SO TODAY, ILLINOIS' SIGNED A

 

WAIVER FOR 101 COUNTIES OUT OF

 

THE 102 COUNTIES HAVE A WAIVER

 

FROM HAVING TO MEET THE WORK

 

REQUIREMENTS AND IT MEANS

 

ANYBODY RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS

 

SHOULD ABLED BODIED, SINGLE

 

YUCKER THAN 50.

 

IF THEY ARE --

 

YOUNGER THAN 50.

 

IF THEY ARE --

 

TO GET THE BENEFITS THEY MUST

 

WORK 20 HOURS A WEEK OR GO

 

THROUGH TRAINING AND ILLINOIS

 

HAD A WAIVER FROM THAT.

 

SO WE'VE HAD SOME OF THE HIGHEST

 

ENROLLMENT NUMBERS IN THE

 

COUNTRY.

 

>> AS I UNDERSTAND THE WAIVER

 

APPLIES TO COUNTIES THAT HAVE

 

UNEMPLOYMENT RATES THAT ARE 20%

 

HIGHER THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE

 

N THOSE COUNTY, THE WORK

 

REQUIREMENTS DO NOT APPLY.

 

WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN NOW, IS

 

IF UNEMPLOYMENT IS ABOVE 6%,

 

THEN THEY CAN GET THE WAIVER.

 

THAT SHRINKS THE AMOUNT OF

 

PEOPLE THAT CAN GET THE WAIVER.

 

NOLAN DOWNEY WHY DO YOU THINK

 

THIS IS A BAD IDEA?

 

>> IT'S IMPORTANT THAT FOLKS

 

UNDERSTAND THAT WHEN WE ARE

 

TALKING ABOUT THIS GROUP, PEOPLE

 

THAT ARE BETWEEN 18-49 ON SNAP

 

THAT DON'T HAVE DEPENDENTS, THEY

 

HAVE SIGNIFICANT BARRIERS TO

 

MAINTAINING THAT STABLE

 

EMPLOYMENT.

 

MANY OF THEM SUFFER FROM

 

PHYSICAL OR MENTAL LIMITATIONS

 

THAT RESTRICT THEIR ABILITY TO

 

GET THAT GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT.

 

MANY ARE UNSTABLELY HOUSED.

 

THEY ARE OVERREPRESENTED IN THE

 

POPULATION OF FOLKS EXPERIENCING

 

HOMELESSNESS.

 

THEY HAVE DIFFICULTY ACCESSING

 

RELIABLE TRANSPORTATION AND

 

TECHNOLOGY AND THE OTHER

 

IMPORTANT THING IS FOR THESE

 

FOLKS THEY ARE DEALING WITH

 

INCREDIBLY FEW RESOURCES.

 

THEIR INCOME TENDS TO BE ONLY A

 

COUPLE,000 A YEAR AND SNAP IS

 

THE ONLY BENEFIT THAT HELPS THEM

 

GET BY.

 

>> TED DABROWSKI WHAT ABOUT

 

THAT?

 

IT SEEMS LIKE THE RULE CHANGE

 

MIGHT BE PUNISHING THOSE BECAUSE

 

THEY ARE NOT WORKING AND PERHAPS

 

THEY CAN'T FIND A JOB?

 

>> WE SHOULD TAKE CARE OF THOSE

 

PEOPLE WHO HAVE A LOT OF THOSE

 

NEEDS.

 

BUT I THINK WHAT WE HAVE TO

 

UNDERSTAND IS THAT IN A PLACE

 

LIKE ILLINOIS WE HAVE FAILED OF

 

GETTING PEOPLE BACK TO WORK.

 

WE HAVE THE 7TH HIGHEST

 

ENROLLMENT IN FOOD STAMPS IN THE

 

COUNTRY OUR NEIGHBORING

 

RECOVERED AND REDUCED THE PEOPLE

 

BELOW THE GREAT RECESSION WE ARE

 

HIGHER.

 

>> THAT IS BECAUSE ILLINOIS HAS

 

MORE COUNTIES THAT HAVE HIGHER

 

UNEMPLOYMENT?

 

>> WE'VE HAD A WORSE EMPLOYMENT

 

PERFORMANCE.

 

WE'VE HAD OTHER PROBLEMS AS

 

WE'VE DISCUSSED ON THE SHOW.

 

BUT WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN AND

 

HERE IS WHAT IS INTERESTING WE

 

NEED TO TAKE CARE OF THOSE

 

PEOPLE.

 

IN ILLINOIS BECAUSE WE HAVE HAD

 

SO MANY ON FOOD STAMPS FOR SO

 

LONG IT'S DIFFICULT TO GET THEM

 

BACK IN THE MARKET BUT THIS IS

 

AS GOOD AS IT GETS WHEN YOU TALK

 

ABOUT THE EMPLOYMENT LEVELS

 

NATIONALLY AND IN ILLINOIS.

 

OUR UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS LOWER

 

THAN IT'S BEEN.

 

THIS IS THE MOMENT IF YOU WANT

 

TO GIVE THESE PEOPLE GET

 

BACKING --

 

GETTING BACK INTO THE WORKFORCE,

 

THIS IS THE MOMENT TO GET THEM

 

BACK IN.

 

IF WE CAN'T GET THEM WORKING NOW

 

THEY WILL BE REGULATED TO FOOD

 

STAMPS THE REST OF THEIR LIVES.

 

>> IS IT YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT

 

IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE TEMPORARY

 

AND THE GOAL IS TO GET PEOPLE

 

OFF OF IT AND BACK INTO SELF

 

SUFFICIENCY?

 

>> PARIS, I DON'T THINK THERE IS

 

ANY DENYING THAT A JOB IS

 

IMPORTANT IN HELPING PEOPLE

 

MEANINGFULLY IMPROVE THEIR

 

LIVES.

 

WHAT I'VE NEVER UNDERSTOOD IS

 

HOW STARVING PEOPLE IS GOING TO

 

HELP THEM GET THERE.

 

WHEN YOU TAKE THE BENEFITS AWAY

 

FROM FOLKS THAT IS NOT A RECIPE

 

FOR SELF SUFFICIENTFY OR

 

ECONOMIC STABILITY IT IS A

 

RECIPE FOR TAKING FOLKS THAT

 

HAVE BARRIERS AND LOW RESOURCES

 

TAKING AWAY THE NUTRITIONAL

 

SUPPORT IS ONLY GOING TO MAKE

 

THE CHALLENGES HARDER.

 

>> AND ANOTHER CRITICISM, THE

 

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS GIVEN

 

OUT AS MUCH AS $28 BILLION IN

 

SUBSIDIES TO FARMERS BECAUSE OF

 

THE TRADE WAR WE ARE TALKING

 

ABOUT $5 BILLION OVER FIVE YEARS

 

TO BE SAVED FROM THESE FOOD

 

STAMP SAVINGS IT'S INCONSISTENT

 

THERE?

 

>> I DON'T KNOW.

 

IF YOU LOOK AT THE ECONOMY BOTH

 

NATIONALLY AND IN ILLINOIS THIS

 

IS THE LOWEST RATES OF

 

UNEMPLOYMENT FOR BLACKS,

 

MINORITIES, HISPANICS.

 

IT IS AN AMAZING TIME TO GET A

 

JOB AND GET OUT OF THE

 

DEPENDENCY ON FOOD STAMPS.

 

I THINK IN ILLINOIS MAYBE TOO

 

MANY PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THE

 

WAIVERS AND THE MESS WE'VE HAD,

 

TOO MANY PEOPLE ARE BECOMING

 

DEPENDENT AND WE HAVE TO BREAK

 

THAT DEPENDENCE.

 

THE BEST THING FOR PEOPLE ARE

 

JOBS TO FIND MEANING IN THEIR

 

LIVES.

 

TO BE ON FOOD STAMPS AND NOT

 

HAVE THE IMPETUS TO GO OUT TO

 

WORK IS THE WRONG THING.

 

>> HOW MANY PEOPLE IN ILLINOIS

 

IS THIS GOING TO AFFECT?

 

>> THIS COULD IMPACT AS MANY AS

 

140,000 PEOPLE HERE IN ILLINOIS.

 

AND WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT EVERY

 

OTHER AREA THAT HAS HAD TO

 

IMPLEMENT THIS TIME LIMIT MANY

 

OF THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO LOSE

 

BENEFITS.

 

IN ILLINOIS THIS IS NOT OUR

 

FIRST ENCOUNTER, ONE COUNTY HAD

 

TO IMPLEMENT IT IN DUPAGE

 

COUNTY.

 

AFTER THE THREE MONTHS HALF THE

 

PEOPLE IN THIS GROUP THAT WERE

 

RECEIVING SNAP LOST THEIR

 

BENEFITS.

 

>> AND IN COOK COUNTY, ABOUT

 

50,000 WILL LOSE THEIR BENEFITS

 

UNDER THE CURRENT RULE BECAUSE

 

COOK COUNTY'S ECONOMY HAS

 

IMPROVED.

 

THIS IS DOUBLING THE PROBLEM

 

HERE FOR COOK COUNTY RESIDENTS?

 

>> I DON'T KNOW.

 

I LOOK AT THIS AS A BIG

 

OPPORTUNITY BECAUSE WITH THE

 

ECONOMY SO HOT WITH THE

 

UNEMPLOYMENT SO HOT AND THERE'S

 

THEY ARE LOOKING FOR 80,000 JOBS

 

IN ILLINOIS WE HAVE TO DO A

 

BETTER JOB OF MATCHING.

 

BUT OUR NEIGHBORING STATES ARE

 

DOING FAR BETTER IN GETTING

 

PEOPLE OFF OF FOOD STAMPS.

 

INDIANA 30% LOWER THAN THE GREAT

 

RECESSION WE ARE 17% HIGHER.

 

WE HAVE TO LOOK AT OUR ECONOMY

 

AND THE POLICIES WE HAVE THAT

 

ARE KEEPING PEOPLE OUT OF JOBS.

 

>> WHY ARE THE STATES GOING IN

 

DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS?

 

>> I MEAN IT'S IMPORTANT

 

QUESTION BUT I WANT TO RESPOND

 

TO THIS NOTION THAT THE ECONOMY

 

IS BOOMING AND THAT THERE ARE

 

JUST AN ABUNDANCE OF JOBS

 

WAITING TO TRANSPORT PEOPLE OUT

 

OF POVERTY.

 

THE REALITY IS MANY OF THE JOBS

 

ARE LOW PAYING JOBS THEY ARE

 

PART-TIME JOBS AND SOME ARE NOT

 

GOING TO BE SUFFICIENT FOR

 

PEOPLE TO MEET THIS WORK

 

REQUIREMENT.

 

WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT A BOOMING

 

ECONOMY YOU HAVE TO RECOGNIZE

 

THE GENERAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

 

DOES NOT PAINT THE WHOLE

 

PICTURE.

 

WHAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS

 

SAYING HERE IS THAT EVEN IN

 

AREAS THAT HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY

 

HIGHER UNEMPLOYMENT THAN THE

 

NATIONAL AVERAGE WE'RE STILL

 

GOING TO BE FORCING FOLKS TO

 

FIND A JOB THAT IS GOING TO BE

 

ABLE TO GET THEM OFF OF FOOD

 

STAMPS.

 

IT'S NOT REALISTIC.

 

>> ANOTHER POSSIBLE CRITICISM

 

HERE AGAIN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT

 

$5 BILLION TO BE SAVED OVER FIVE

 

YEARS.

 

WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE AMOUNT OF

 

TAXES NOT BEING PAID BY THE

 

BIGGEST COMPANIES, IBM, GENERAL

 

MOTORS, AMAZON DOESN'T THAT

 

ACCOUNT FOR SO MUCH MORE MONEY

 

THAN WHAT IS BEING SAVED HERE?

 

>> WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL NOT TO

 

MIX THE THINGS.

 

THERE ARE POLICIES WE SHOULD

 

CHANGE WHEN IT COMES TO

 

CORPORATIONS AND TAXES AND THAT

 

IS A SEPARATE DISCUSSION.

 

WHAT IS CRITICAL HERE AND IT IS

 

A SITUATION FOR ILLINOIS, IS

 

THAT THINGS LIKE FOOD STAMPS

 

HIDE THE REAL PROBLEMS WE HAVE.

 

WE HAVE A PENSION PROBLEM, WE

 

HAVE AN ECONOMIC PROBLEM, WE

 

HAVE AN UNEMPLOYMENT PROBLEM

 

BROADLY, THE FOOD STAMPS ALLOW

 

OUR GOVERNMENT TO HIDE BEHIND

 

THOSE THINGS.

 

WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS CHANGE OUR

 

POLICIES TO HAVE MORE GROWTH AND

 

MORE INVESTMENT IN ILLINOIS AND