WEBVTT 00:02.033 --> 00:06.000 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% GUEST: I bought this at an auction, a charity auction, in the late '80s, early '90s, and 00:08.033 --> 00:12.566 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% this one was also in a charity auction about five years ago. 00:12.566 --> 00:14.633 align:left position:20% line:83% size:70% APPRAISER: What did you pay for them? 00:14.633 --> 00:19.066 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% GUEST: I know I paid $500 for this. I'm not sure about that, but I would guess about $1,500. 00:20.233 --> 00:22.266 align:left position:20% line:83% size:70% APPRAISER: What drew you to these? 00:22.266 --> 00:26.400 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% GUEST: Well, when I was 11, my grandmother took me to the first film showing of "The 00:28.433 --> 00:31.800 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% King and I," and I fell in love with the American musical. And so, I've always been interested 00:33.433 --> 00:37.133 align:left position:20% line:77% size:70% in acquiring part of its history, and these are sort of iconic pieces. 00:39.133 --> 00:42.633 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% APPRAISER: What we have here next to me is a costume sketch by Irene Sharaff of Chita 00:43.533 --> 00:44.866 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% Rivera, who portrayed Anita. 00:44.866 --> 00:46.900 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% GUEST: Right. 00:46.900 --> 00:50.833 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% APPRAISER: Both in the 1957 Broadway debut and the West End debut of the play in London. 00:50.833 --> 00:55.800 align:left position:10% line:71% size:80% On your side, we have, obviously, Carol Channing, in probably her most famous role, from the 00:57.833 --> 01:01.033 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% 1964 original production of "Hello, Dolly!" And this one's by Freddy Wittop. These are 01:03.000 --> 01:06.366 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% pretty great productions to have pieces from, because obviously they're both award-winning. 01:06.366 --> 01:10.233 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% This one was done by Irene Sharaff, a very famous costume designer. She was nominated 01:10.233 --> 01:14.866 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% for best costume design on this, but didn't win. And that one, Freddy Wittop, he actually 01:14.866 --> 01:19.866 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% did win the award for best costume design for "Hello, Dolly!" This won two of its six 01:22.266 --> 01:25.700 align:left position:10% line:71% size:80% Tony nominations for scenic design and choreography, and "Hello, Dolly!" won ten of their 11 Tony 01:29.300 --> 01:33.266 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% nominations, which actually was a record that held for 37 years. So, this is really one 01:33.266 --> 01:38.266 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% of the most famous musicals, I think, also having Academy Award- winning film made out 01:39.633 --> 01:40.966 align:left position:10% line:83% size:80% of it, and this role really was Carol Channing. 01:40.966 --> 01:43.633 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% GUEST: Yes. 01:43.633 --> 01:46.766 align:left position:10% line:71% size:80% APPRAISER: She not only did the original production in '64, she did a 1995 revival, which is extraordinary. 01:46.766 --> 01:51.733 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% All those years later, she was still able to carry that show. And sadly, we obviously 01:52.633 --> 01:53.766 align:left position:10% line:89% size:80% lost her in January of 2019. 01:53.766 --> 01:55.900 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% GUEST: Right. 01:55.900 --> 01:58.700 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% APPRAISER: The "West Side Story" piece in front of me, we see that Chita Rivera has 01:58.700 --> 02:03.666 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% signed the mat for you. And she signed below this depiction of herself in her two primary 02:05.633 --> 02:09.433 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% costumes from the musical. The "West Side Story" piece is a gouache and ink on board. 02:11.433 --> 02:14.100 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% The Carol Channing is actually framed so that we can't see the edges to tell if that's board 02:14.100 --> 02:18.566 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% or paper. But, it is also gouache. Each of these are signed by the costume designer. 02:18.566 --> 02:23.500 align:left position:20% line:71% size:70% Sharaff has signed it and then also listed the name of the production, and listed "America," 02:23.500 --> 02:28.500 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% because these are the costumes that she would have worn during that most famous number. 02:30.400 --> 02:34.366 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% And the Carol Channing is also signed by the costume designer. And it's actually signed 02:34.366 --> 02:38.966 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% in paint. When you brought them up, the first thing I think about with value is, in the 02:38.966 --> 02:43.966 align:left position:10% line:71% size:80% marketplace, we generally don't see many Broadway pieces as compared to Hollywood pieces, the 02:45.833 --> 02:49.200 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% film costumes. And they traditionally don't sell as well as the film costume sketches 02:51.266 --> 02:54.500 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% for these very famous roles. But, when you look at these, you have to look at who is 02:56.633 --> 03:00.233 align:left position:20% line:71% size:70% portrayed, what's the production, is it the original production, what's the character, 03:02.200 --> 03:05.600 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% how visually desirable are they. And both of these tick every single box you could possibly 03:07.566 --> 03:11.366 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% hope to tick, because they're both really important shows. They're both visually appealing. 03:11.366 --> 03:16.066 align:left position:20% line:71% size:70% I think your, your Carol Channing is probably the most visually impactful here. A lot of 03:16.066 --> 03:20.133 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% times, when there are charity auctions, the whole point is actually to overpay for things. 03:20.133 --> 03:22.100 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% GUEST: Right. 03:22.100 --> 03:24.100 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% APPRAISER: You're there to support a charity. It's a little bit of a good news, bad news 03:24.100 --> 03:28.000 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% on this, This one, you probably paid closer to what it is worth now. But years ago, when 03:30.166 --> 03:33.700 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% you, when you bought it back then, and you probably overpaid for it just a little bit. 03:33.700 --> 03:37.666 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% Now, it probably has caught up to where you're at, and the auction estimate would probably 03:37.666 --> 03:38.666 align:left position:20% line:89% size:70% be $2,000 to $3,000. 03:38.666 --> 03:40.600 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% GUEST: Mm-hmm. 03:40.600 --> 03:43.966 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% APPRAISER: On the Carol Channing, I'm very conservative in this, because I think the 03:43.966 --> 03:48.966 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% fact that she just passed away, I anticipate that the market for her is about to shift, 03:51.000 --> 03:53.033 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% and I would expect there'll be more pieces of hers in the market, and so we'll have more 03:53.033 --> 03:57.933 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% data to go by. Right now, I would conservatively estimate it at $2,000 to $3,000, as well. 03:59.833 --> 04:02.766 align:left position:10% line:77% size:80% But I expect that that would do better if it came up, because it's just such a great, 04:02.766 --> 04:04.833 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% striking piece. 04:04.833 --> 04:08.833 align:left position:20% line:71% size:70% GUEST: That's great. But I really didn't buy them as an investment. I bought them because 04:09.433 --> 04:09.800 align:left position:30% line:89% size:60% I like the work.