1
00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:02,936
- I represented Mitch McConnell.

2
00:00:02,936 --> 00:00:06,840
Not my favorite public servant.

3
00:00:06,840 --> 00:00:11,911
- So let me turn 
first to Floyd Abrams.

4
00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:16,783
- [Floyd] But I agreed 
with his views on this.

5
00:00:19,619 --> 00:00:21,321
- Thank you, Senator.

6
00:00:21,321 --> 00:00:25,959
I'm delighted to be here in 
rather unaccustomed company.

7
00:00:25,959 --> 00:00:27,594
(politician chuckles)

8
00:00:27,594 --> 00:00:29,896
It's the oldest of cliches

9
00:00:29,896 --> 00:00:33,900
that politics makes 
strange bedfellows.

10
00:00:33,900 --> 00:00:36,503
It is not at all 
strange that people

11
00:00:36,503 --> 00:00:40,640
who disagree politically 
can come together

12
00:00:40,640 --> 00:00:43,109
in defending the 
First Amendment.

13
00:00:43,109 --> 00:00:45,612
- Right away, we're in the area

14
00:00:45,612 --> 00:00:49,916
where there is the absolute 
most First Amendment protection.

15
00:00:49,916 --> 00:00:54,154
Nothing's more important than 
speech about who to vote for,

16
00:00:55,622 --> 00:00:58,591
and maybe nothing, nothing, 
nothing is more important

17
00:00:58,591 --> 00:01:00,827
than who to vote 
for for President.

18
00:01:00,827 --> 00:01:02,695
That was an easy case.

19
00:01:02,695 --> 00:01:04,764
That must be one

20
00:01:04,764 --> 00:01:09,369
in which the First 
Amendment carries the day.

21
00:01:09,369 --> 00:01:11,905
- I actually was at the 
Citizens United Argument.

22
00:01:13,173 --> 00:01:14,441
I was a young lawyer

23
00:01:14,441 --> 00:01:16,943
in the Obama White 
House Counsel's Office,

24
00:01:16,943 --> 00:01:19,379
and the White House would 
often send lawyers to the court

25
00:01:19,379 --> 00:01:21,381
for kind of big, 
significant arguments.

26
00:01:22,849 --> 00:01:26,252
Citizens United was initially 
a pretty narrow case.

27
00:01:26,252 --> 00:01:28,822
It's actually not really 
about a ban on anything,

28
00:01:28,822 --> 00:01:30,356
but about just like a limitation

29
00:01:30,356 --> 00:01:33,393
on when you could spend money 
and how you could spend money.

30
00:01:33,393 --> 00:01:35,361
But then the court, when 
everyone was expecting

31
00:01:35,361 --> 00:01:38,064
the case to be decided 
in June of 2009,

32
00:01:38,064 --> 00:01:41,668
the court conspicuously set 
the case for re-argument

33
00:01:41,668 --> 00:01:44,404
and reframing in much, 
much broader terms.

34
00:01:46,306 --> 00:01:47,874
- [Chief Justice] Mr. Abrams.

35
00:01:47,874 --> 00:01:51,044
- [Floyd] Mr. Chief Justice, 
and may it please the court.

36
00:01:51,044 --> 00:01:52,245
The first case-

37
00:01:52,245 --> 00:01:54,047
- He didn't go 
small. He went big.

38
00:01:54,047 --> 00:01:56,549
He said, "This is 
an opportunity.

39
00:01:56,549 --> 00:01:59,285
You could decide this 
case on narrow grounds."

40
00:01:59,285 --> 00:02:00,386
There's good 
arguments to be made

41
00:02:00,386 --> 00:02:01,521
that the court 
should have decided

42
00:02:01,521 --> 00:02:04,724
on the narrow 
grounds, but justices,

43
00:02:04,724 --> 00:02:08,261
you should please make a 
big, bold statement saying

44
00:02:08,261 --> 00:02:11,030
that "the First Amendment 
protects independent spending

45
00:02:11,030 --> 00:02:13,433
by corporations in 
candidate elections."

46
00:02:14,901 --> 00:02:17,403
(epic music)